2009 Gibson Custom Shop Les Paul Historic 1959 Reissue
Posted 26 September 2009 - 01:40 AM
here is the link..
Aren't all 1959 reissues considered "custom shop" that is stated , is he just being word-ee?
Is the 50 aniversity different from a regular 59 reissue?
whats does r9 mean? is it different from a standard 1959 reissue?
Was it unwise to remove fake dirt?
Is there a website that i can check out to see the differences in these reissues?
It seems to be a good value(?) and i like the rosewood very tight. Any comments or information is appreciated.....thanks, tom
Posted 26 September 2009 - 01:55 AM
R8 = '58 reissue, etc.
All R9s are Custom Shop.
50th anniversary just means it was built in the anniversary year 2009.
Technically speaking, all 2009s are 50th anniversary models but only some of them come with certificates that state "50th". I have one of the first 500, 2009 R9s that were the official 50th anniversary R9s. The only difference between my guitar and that one is mine has a gold certificate, it's Heritage Cherry, and is not VOS. VOS meaning it doesn't look like a brand new guitar.
Fake dirt is just the VOS stuff. There's no harm in removing it as long as the guy used the proper cloth and didn't scratch the guitar. I've wiped the VOS off of two of my guitars.
Is there a good website? Sure, right here...ask away.
All 2009 reissues have the new appointments. They're a little different from 2008 & older reissues.
The only difference between an R7, R8 & R9 is the price. R9s have flame tops and that's why they cost more. Exact same guitar.
Seems like a good price. About the going rate for a used, older R9.
Posted 26 September 2009 - 02:48 AM
Posted 26 September 2009 - 02:53 AM
i dont think the VOS will affect the finish other than make it look bad (imo). its can also be sticky to the touch. just polish that crap right off. ;-)
Posted 26 September 2009 - 03:14 AM
"The day when you pick up a guitar and there's nothing coming through whatsoever, there's no new pieces, there's no new ideas - and that's the sort of gift any creative person has - there's always that point that that might happen to you, when you're too old to pick the guitar up - and we're just trying to keep that day far, far away and out of sight."
- James Patrick Page
- 2008 Gibson Les Paul Studio
- 2009 Martin OM-1
- 2011 'Skylark' Les Paul Replica
- Jet City 20H
- Phaez Sibly
- Fender Champion 600
- Fender Super Champ XD
Posted 26 September 2009 - 04:47 AM
2010 Fender Custom Shop Sonic Blue Nocaster Closet Classic (Julia)
1998 Fender 3-Tone Sunburst USA Standard Strat (Number Two)
1990's Alhambra Classical
1970's Yamaha Classical
Posted 26 September 2009 - 06:57 PM
Hey Are Nine,
What about neck profiles and frets, no difference?
Still trying to work the finances (& the financial manager i.e. my wife ) to add an R9 to my recently acquired red-top R6
Historics really are worth the extra, but then I don't have to tell you that, do I????
Posted 26 September 2009 - 11:40 PM
R9s aren't something you buy everyday, make sure you like everything about it.
OK, as Les Paul guys I think we really split hairs when it comes to things like neck profiles.
Neck profiles are supposed to be slightly different between years. R6s & R7s having the fattest necks (probably R4s, too), followed by R8s, then R9s, with R0s having the slimmest necks.
That's the general rule and probably what you'll encounter 99% of the time but it's not always the case. I've played an R9 with a fatter neck than my R8 and an R7 with a slimmer neck than my R8.
All the Black Beauty Rs I've played had similar necks to my R9.
I don't know when the switch was made but there was a time when R9s had the jumbo frets and the rest didn't.
Fret wire is all the same now. I've never noticed a reissue with thinner frets. Oldest I've played being a 2005 or 2004.
When I say they're all the same now, I mean just that. Only differences are neck sizes, finishes, plain top/flame top, & weight of each individual guitar.
Again, R9s are supposed to weigh less but it's not always the case. Now, just because they're all built the same, doesn't mean they all feel/sound the same.
Some are better than others...much better.
VOS - it's about a 2-1/2 to 3 hour process (at least for me, it was. lol) to clean it off.
You just need some cotton rags and a good cleaner and/or polisher. I used Virtuoso Cleaner & Polish, two separate bottles.
Basically, take off all the hardware until your guitar looks like this (picture) and start polishing.
All this does is remove the milky white haze from the wood but it doesn't look bad to begin with.
I didn't bother cleaning the hardware because it looks great, as is.
If you were to clean the hardware, you'd need a non-abrasive cleaner.
The end result is a shinny guitar but maybe not 100% as shinny as a high gloss model.
Neo, you should get a reissue.
[quote name='Bluesburst]Historics really are worth the extra' date=' but then I don't have to tell you that, do I????[/quote']
No, no you don't...
Although, I must say, I am very impressed with my new Traditional.
It doesn't feel like crap after playing my R9 like my old '06 LP Standard and every other USA LP I've tried.
Definitely not in the same league as a Custom Shop Les Paul but a great guitar on its own.
Posted 27 September 2009 - 05:37 AM
I've also wiped the backs of the necks several times; so, even if there was any on the back, it's not there anymore.
The tops feel smooth beforehand but like glass afterwards, just like waxing a car.