Tech21 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I am looking to purchase an ES 339 (or possibly an CS 336) and I would like to know which of the 2 neck profiles on offer on the 339 would suit me better. I can’t actually go to my local music shop to do the simple thing and try them both out because I live in New Zealand and I have no music shop anywhere near me who stock Gibson Guitars. I bought all my Guitars in the UK and moved to NZ two years ago. Amongs other guitars I have, the Gibson's and Epiphone that I own are : - A 2005 Gibson ’61 SG re-issue. A 1973/4 Gibson SG Standard (dated from the pots, October 1973) A 2005 Epiphone ES 335 Dot Made in the Peerless factory, Korea. The ’61 SG neck I find to be slightly too slim for my taste. The ’74 SG is fine but is narrower across the Nut end of the neck than the ’61 Re-Issue. The Epiphone ES 335 neck is very comfortable. In all honesty the best feeling guitar neck that I own is on a PRS CU22 (Wide, Fat) So my question is, given the above information, which would be the better profile to go for on a 339... 50’s or 60’s? I suspect the answer is 50's but does that extra 30 thou really make any difference to the feel of the 60's one? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsl Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I would choose the 50's neck since you find the '61 too slim. I've played a few 50's neck 339's & they were very comfortable. Not at all like the "baseball bat" reissues - more like a '59 Profile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tech21 Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 Thanks for the reply. That was my worry that the '59 necks may be the old baseball bat type which I really don't like. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clayville Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 The 60s Slim Taper neck on my CS-356 is smallish in the shoulders compared to many Gibsons but not overly thin (for me) or "flat" in the front-to-back girth -- to my hands, it's just a bit smaller than most '59 LP historics I've encountered, and perfect for me. It's not wide/flat either. The ES-339 30/60 necks I've tried all seemed just a bit chunkier (fron to back) than my CS-356 (hence the ".3 over 60s" origin of the name) -- but they were not real "big" like, say, an R8 or R7. Can't help you with the "50s" necks... they're all too big for me! One caution though: as I understand it, neck profiles are one of the areas where there's a significant amount of hand-work in the shaping/sanding by the Gibson craftsmen... so there's variety even amongst those necks that are spec'd the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 I like my 30/60 a lot. I don't like the fat necks, but my Studio is very comfortable, not fat like the old ones. Best of luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.