Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Does anyone like to play with "dead" strings?


Snaglpuss

Recommended Posts

Does anyone else like to play with "dead" strings?

 

I just changed the strings on my Blues King Electro and it's driving me crazy. I guess I'll have to wait a couple of months till things get back to "normal". The shimmer and mettalic overtones of new strings are just not my thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find that flatwound nickel strings (Pyramids or D'Addario Chromes) give me that "dead" tone' date=' from the get-go.[/quote']

 

Interesting - those are a couple of my favourite bass strings. maybe I should try them on my guitars.

How about Thomastik-Infeld flats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know what you mean. my strings sound best after 7-10 days, and then stay theat way for a couple weeks. i change them out every 3-4 weeks. but gibsons, over every other guitar i have played, really shine with worn in strings. which means, they are amazing in spite of the strings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tedkul' date='

Are you using electric strings on an accoustic?

Did a string search at MF and see only bass and electric chromes.

Do you know the "model number"?

What are Pyramids, not familiar with them?

Thanks [/quote']

 

Other than in extremely strange circumstances (i.e. a weak neck with high-tension strings) the choice of strings for your guitar should be determined by your ears and musical taste, not the label on the package.

 

I use Pyramid Gold Flatwound Mediums (11-048). I buy them here: www.thestringguy.com

But you can get them here too: http://www.tone-man.com/pyramid.htm

And probably some other places too.

 

Flatwound strings appear acoustically on most of the Beatles records. To my ears, the 60-65 period Dylan sounds like Flatwounds to me, as do the early Donovan records. But those may also have been "deadened" bronze strings. From what I understand, many players in the early sixties preferred flats due to the disappearance of "Fingernoise" when changing positions on the neck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I once tried some Elixir's and it took me 3 weeks to break them in.....they were so jangly......I know a guy who uses electrical guitar strings on his 1960's J-50 acoustic......says he likes the sound. Claims they don't go dead as fast? Who knows??

 

Haha! I love that jangly sound! Medium Elixirs are a treat!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a strange phenomena with keeping old strings on lap style resonator (dobro) slide guitars. They actually sound better. Most square neck resonator guitar players I know, myself included, keep strings on for a realllllly long time. As they stiffen from age, they actually play better with a bar slide. I haven't changed mine on one square necked guitar of mine in probably over five years. On another square necked guitar of mine, the strings are relatively new on it....a year old. Also, 5 string banjo players don't generally like to change their strings either...being a five string banjo player also, I have two 5 stringers that haven't had a string change in years on them. Pete Seeger even once condoned the practice of barely changing strings on a five string banjo if I'm not mistaken.

 

QM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The deader, the better--up to the point where intonation is noticeably off. "Dead" strings allow you to hear the guitar; new strings make all guitars same about the same to me--loud and clangy. I hear of folks wanting new strings put on a guitar in a shop so they can hear what the piece sounds like with fresh strings, but I would rather judge a guitar with so-called "dead" strings every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The deader' date=' the better--up to the point where intonation is noticeably off. "Dead" strings allow you to hear the guitar; new strings make all guitars same about the same to me--loud and clangy. I hear of folks wanting new strings put on a guitar in a shop so they can hear what the piece sounds like with fresh strings, but I would rather judge a guitar with so-called "dead" strings every time.[/quote']

 

I've never thought of it that way, but I suppose you have a point. I guess some people want new strings so that they can judge the guitar's best potential, while others (like yourself) would rather judge a guitar based on "worst case scenario". Now, I'm not sure which would be the better way to do it. They both sound logical to me and both methods would have merit. I suppose you could play it with the dead strings first, and then put new ones on to hear what it's potential will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find my J50 sounds much much better when the strings are very well broken in. Warm, mellow and lovely. Can't stand the bright tone of new strings on most of my guitars, and even more on the Gibson.

 

To me new strings doesn't represent well the real tone of a guitar, because of the excessive jangle and brightness.

 

 

 

Phil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My feeling is that dead strings make a good guitar sound like a cheap guitar because you lose resonance and tone - worse still is the fact that dead strings seldom tune accurately.

 

I have played on old strings when I was a street performer and if you are in a situation like that where tone isn't going to carry, I guess it doesn't matter -- but if you are playing in an acoustically interesting room you want a fresh set of John Pearse strings and quiet. I unplug the fridge and the water cooler when I play. Quiet means quiet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...