Gibson Guitar Board: Strings - Nut - Saddle - Pins - They are essential to TONE! - Gibson Guitar Board

Jump to content

  • (5 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Strings - Nut - Saddle - Pins - They are essential to TONE! Lets discuss the different brands and materials

#1 User is offline   nodehopper 

  • Hack Player Extraordinaire
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 755
  • Joined: 26-December 07
  • LocationForesthill

Posted 31 December 2010 - 02:13 PM

Ok...To start off. I personally change the saddle and pins on all my guitars from the factory plastic to bone. I believe bone saddle/pins/nut do enhance the sound of my guitars and is a fairly low cost/low risk upgrade. (A little bit of MOP inlay on the pins can also give a little bling). Saddle and pins are something anyone can DYI, cutting and installing the nut is probably something for a good guitar tech to do for you and should be under $100

A couple resources for this upgrade, but not limited to, would include:

StewMac Saddles

StewMac Pins

Bob Colosi Custom Saddles and Pins

Frets.com Steel String Guitar Users Manual has lots of info on saddles, pins etc.

As far as strings go here is some basic info:

Quick primer on strings


I personally prefer coated strings such as:

D'Addario EXP Coated 80/20 Bronze Acoustic Guitar Strings

Martin SP Lifespan Phosphor Bronze Coated Acoustic Guitar Strings

While many here love Elixer strings ...I am personally not a fan. YMMV

Coated strings last longer and some will reduce finger squeak a bit. Purists believe the coating reduces tone or some people tend to change strings so often the extra cost for coated strings doesn't make sense.

And for small delicate guitars I love Newtone Heritage Acoustic Guitar Strings
(They are designed to have a reduced and virtually equal tension on each string.)

My general thoughts on string selection.

If you have a guitar that is naturally loud and bright go with Phosphor Bronze strings to bring some extra sweetness and complexity to its sound.

If you have a guitar that is a little on the quiet side or needs a boost in treble use 80/20 strings.

Two properties of strings that have a lot of influence on sound are string gauge and string tension.

Generally the larger the gauge the greater the tension, but not always. A couple websites like Just Strings have some information on string tension for a few of the strings they sell and it can be very interesting. Some manufacturers have the info on their websites. I wish this info was more easily available.

I would say the average steel string guitar player uses what are called "lights". Lights are also called 12's because generally that is the gauge of the high "E"string, but buyer beware that this is not an industry standard and also many sets of "lights or 12's" can have the other strings in the set vary in gauge from brand to brand.

Experimenting with strings is probably the single most effective, easy and inexpensive way to bring out the best tone of your guitar. Trying .11's .12's and mediums .13's can greatly effect the guitars sound. Most modern guitars can handle .13's, but make sure you refer to the guitars manual to be sure before stinging up .13's. (Warning - changing string gauge can change the action of your guitar. For example heavier strings will pull harder causing string height on the fretboard to raise and may require a truss rod adjustment)

80/20, phosphor bronze, coated and uncoated, custom strings sets where the low E A and D strings are heaver gauge to bring out a guitars bass response, etc...etc. The possibilities are endless and the fun of experimenting is Guitar Nerd Heaven!!

Alright ....let's discuss! Agree with me....Disagree with me....
Stephen ...... "Ain't no more potatoes, the frost have killed the vine ......
Well, the blues ain't nothin' but a good woman on your mind" MJH



John How - LBC --- Gibson CJ-165 --- Washburn R316

Martin 000-15S --- Martin 000-28EC

Gibson LP Studio Premium Plus - Danelectro U2
1

#2 User is offline   ol fred 

  • Wannabe Guitar Player
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 851
  • Joined: 20-December 10
  • LocationNever Sweat Ranch

Posted 31 December 2010 - 02:58 PM

I have always used Martin and D' Addario lights, For some reason I changed to DR MT10's Way to thumpy, had to reset my truss, and a great deal of difficulty stayin in tune. Just one experience. As to the rest....[thumbup] "WHAT YOU SAID"
Guitars
Cadillacs
Hillbilly Music
One big ol backyard with a stage


https://www.facebook...neversweatranch
0

#3 User is offline   larryp58 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1455
  • Joined: 28-March 09
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 31 December 2010 - 03:01 PM

Not much to add. I agree with Node on this, one of the cheapest improvements that can be made to improve volume, tone and sustain. I do, however, love Elixer strings. PB Nano lights. I've tried all the others, I kept going back to Elixers. They do it for me! +1 on Bob Colosi's pins and saddles!
From Hank to Hendrix, I walked these streets with you. Here I am with this old guitar, doing what I do...Neil Young

2008 True Vintage Southern Jumbo (Colosi bone saddle and pins)
2001 SongBird Deluxe (Colosi bone saddle and pins)
Marshall AS-50D Acoustic Amp
Behringer Eurorack 1202 Mixer
Shure Mics: SM-58, SM-27, PG-81
0

#4 User is offline   onewilyfool 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5925
  • Joined: 28-December 07

Posted 31 December 2010 - 04:24 PM

I agree with Larry and Node....coated strings are the best!! My body chemistry is such that it eats non-coated strings,lol....so I pretty much HAVE to use them!!! Node, I've heard tha you would play better with a new bone,nuts,and I'm pretty sure you've used a saddle before.....
"The sole of my shoes is thin, and I'll soon be on my feet again" Lonnie Johnson
2

#5 User is offline   Paul E 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 169
  • Joined: 01-January 09
  • LocationBlack Hills, SD

Posted 31 December 2010 - 04:27 PM

I agree about the saddle and nut, pins a different issue. I've replaced a set of bone pins with ebony pins and I noticed a difference that made the guitar less tinny ( best word I can use to describe the sound) on my rosewood guitars. When it comes to strings I usually go by phospher bronze for hogs and 80/20's for rosewood, but each guitar is different so applications may change.
Paul
0

#6 User is offline   devellis 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 285
  • Joined: 15-October 10
  • LocationChapel Hill, NC

Posted 31 December 2010 - 05:09 PM

I agree. Plastic seems like a really poor choice for any surface having to take the force of metal guitar strings tuned to pitch. I also agree with Oldguy that for tuning pegs, I'm perfectly happy with ebony and it's less obvious to me how the pins alter the tone. For nut and saddle, I prefer bone not only for its tone but its durability. I think all the bits and pieces of a guitar work together. Something like a bone saddle may add brightness but that can be offset by things like the choice of strings and pick. But bone just strikes me as the "right" material for nut and saddle. It's affordable, attractive, and durable. I consider bone as a reference standard. If a guitar needs a somewhat sweeter tone, I'd rather change something else to make that happen than sacrifice a bone saddle (or not choose that particular guitar to begin with). Even on my least expensive guitar (a Seagull), I have swapped out the original saddle for a Colossi bone replacement, to good effect. I'm also very picky about saddle fit in the bridge slot and have fitted new saddles to other instruments either to alter the string height or, in at least one case, to improve saddle fit. To me, this sort of upgrade just seems like an easy way to improve my level of satisfaction with an instrument.

I've never sprung for FWI or elephant ivory as an upgrade. they're too expensive and I haven't had enough experience with them to be confident I'd prefer the tone. I have mandolins with ivory saddles (on fixed bridge vintage instruments) and it seems to work fine but given its scarcity, expense, and protected status (in the case of elephant ivory), I have no inclination to go that route on any of my guitars. Bone is king, in my book and many guitar builders seem to agree.
Bob DeVellis
0

#7 User is offline   Gilliangirl 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3431
  • Joined: 26-December 07
  • LocationCalgary Alberta Canada

Posted 31 December 2010 - 06:55 PM

Excellent resources in this thread Stephen [thumbup]

I too am a believer that these modifications will change your tone, sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. For example, I put a bone saddle on the Epi and it's just too much sound for that little guy. The Tusq saddle is going back on and if the bone saddle fits the Seagull I might try that. Both Gibsons have bone saddles and pins now and I wouldn't have it any other way.
************************************
Karen

2004 Southern Jumbo (Magic) with bridge pins by Bob Colosi
2005 J-185 (Lily)
1993 Seagull S6 cedar (Jonathan)
2007 Epiphone EL-00 (Elmo)
1, 652 guitar picks (1,645 of them stuck between the barrels of the washing machine)

0

#8 User is online   EuroAussie 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4506
  • Joined: 16-May 10
  • LocationPrague, Czech Republic

Posted 01 January 2011 - 05:22 AM

All excllent points, really good thread and thanks for sharing.

Couple things i would add:

1) I find mediums work great on mahogany b/s dreads as they bring out the natural woody richness of the tone, while 12's are better for rosewood b/s guitars. I found 13's on rosewood dreads in particular chokes the sound.

I prefer non coated strings and i always put a new set of strings before a gig, hence it makes sense to use non coated ones as i reagularly change them. I just find its easier to play with new strings, and as I use DR Sunbeams they have a warm tone straight off the bat so dont have to worry about new string zip'.

Bone pins /saddle - Ive plaed Colossi bone pins / saddles in all my main 3 guitars and yes, i do hear a genuine difference. Its subtle but there, all for the better

Guitar picks - this is probably to me the one thing that can change the tone of a guitar more than anything. Its also the cheapest 'modification'. Thicker picks bring a really different tone compared to lighter ones. Its worth experimenting. Personally i tried numerous picks but i alway come back to the Orange Tortex picks, but if i play a track where there is a lot flat picking i gravitate to a thicker pick, as it makes picking really a lot easier.

OK, thats my 7cents worth.

cheers.
___________________________

69 Gibson Hummingbird
11 Gibson SJ (Aaron Lewis), HB TV
02 Gibson J-150, AJ
43 Gibson LG-2
12 Martin 00-15
09 Furch OM 32SM (custom)
99 Cort Earth 100
95 Les Paul Studio

http://www.reverbnat...oubleshotPrague
0

#9 User is offline   Rambler 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1973
  • Joined: 22-January 08

Posted 01 January 2011 - 08:28 AM

E/A brings up a good point about Dreads (Martin & clones). Large box =more top to move=more string. You might loose a little nuance that way but it brings the sound out. Same rule of thumb apples to J200s.

Meds can be used selectively on smaller boxes. For ex, some Martin guys use a bigger string on 000s (24.5) for extra tension/response, so they are more like an OM (25.4)--no dog in that fight, just saying. And I tended to like the AJ and BK I had better with meds=again, more sound (the BK turned into the mouse that roared). Oth J45s I prefer lights.
"As through this world you ramble, you meet some funny men. Some rob you with a six-gun, some rob you with a fountain pen"
Woodrow WIlson Guthrie.

"Aint no easy job to sit down and play guitar!" Rev. Gary Davis
0

#10 User is offline   zombywoof 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3282
  • Joined: 24-January 08

Posted 01 January 2011 - 01:05 PM

My two cents is that when many folks say better they are actually hearing brighter. When it comes to strings I think the core of the string has a substantial role in producing sound. I prefer round core nickel strings. While the hex cores hold the wrapping better, the round core puts less tension on the neck and tend to produce a different sound - to my ears a punchier attack. I would also argue the thicker the core the fatter the sound.
__________________________________________________

"I play so rough - I stomp 'em - I don't peddle 'em"
Bukka White
0

#11 User is offline   chasAK 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 250
  • Joined: 19-November 10

Posted 01 January 2011 - 02:49 PM

I replaced the nut, saddle, and bridge pins on my 08 j45 (MC). The nut and bridge were replaced with bone and the bridge pins with FWI, I just wanted bone or something harder that plastic (FWI is all the luthier uses for bridge pin, being in Alaska it is a nice AK touch). Here are my noticeable affects: 1. Much great sustain, 2. More note clarity, this was more noticeable in chord variations, 3. Louder, and 4. A bit brighter.
The added brightness concerns me a bit, but I have received a couple of option (from this forum) to help with this. I agree that the benefits, especially the note clarity and sustain, outweigh the perceived add brightness. I am going to try different strings and, as bkharmony suggested in a response to an earlier post of mine, I am going to try some different picks.
Concerning the picks, are the materials used in Blue Chip and Dunlop Totex a softer material, or what makes the tonal difference? And which would lend to a more mellow sound?
0

#12 User is offline   Murph 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6530
  • Joined: 03-August 08
  • LocationIllinois

Posted 02 January 2011 - 06:24 AM

 EuroAussie, on 01 January 2011 - 05:22 AM, said:


Guitar picks - this is probably to me the one thing that can change the tone of a guitar more than anything. Its also the cheapest 'modification'.


BINGO !

And after many decades of gigging I would have told you you were NUTS a year ago for saying this.

My experiments with picks started out costing me $40.00 for a single Bluechip.

Let the insanity begin.....
-----------------------------------------------------
The Murph Channel

http://www.youtube.c...XH9qn-xLKCv4WOg

'03 J45 RW (ebony board/bridge)
1933 A-00 Mandolin (was Scotty Stonemans)
'07 Custom Shop ES-339
'08 Wine Red Studio Les Paul
'61 Double Cut Twin Pickup Melody Maker
'79 "The" SG
'91 American Tri-burst Tele
'00 Mexican Jazz Bass
Deering Goodtime banger
0

#13 User is offline   gijs 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 175
  • Joined: 31-May 10

Posted 04 January 2011 - 04:16 PM

I'm thinking of moving to all bone on my 09 Bird, but I am a bit reluctant as it already sounds somewhat bright. Scared to make the brightness a bit too overwhelming.

Any thoughts on that or experience in changing to bone on standard Birds?
0

#14 User is offline   nodehopper 

  • Hack Player Extraordinaire
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 755
  • Joined: 26-December 07
  • LocationForesthill

Posted 04 January 2011 - 05:28 PM

 gijs, on 04 January 2011 - 04:16 PM, said:

I'm thinking of moving to all bone on my 09 Bird, but I am a bit reluctant as it already sounds somewhat bright. Scared to make the brightness a bit too overwhelming.

Any thoughts on that or experience in changing to bone on standard Birds?




You can easily and cheaply experiment with bone pins and saddle. Get a saddle blank and bone pins at StewMac for $30 -$40 (you will need to grind and sand the blank to match the original) and see how you like the sound. Just save your originals and if you don't like the sound...swap the originals back in. If the Nut isn't already bone, wait until you know how the bone saddle and pins effect the sound of the guitar, then have a Tech or Luthier cut and install a bone nut. The nut will be more costly and requires some skill to remove the old and cut and install the new one.

If the Bone is more efficient transferring string vibration to the top and you like that, but it is a little bright, you can then experiment with different strings to get a mellower tone.

Again saddles, pins (as long as you keep the originals) and strings are cheap and easy to experiment with ...have fun!
Stephen ...... "Ain't no more potatoes, the frost have killed the vine ......
Well, the blues ain't nothin' but a good woman on your mind" MJH



John How - LBC --- Gibson CJ-165 --- Washburn R316

Martin 000-15S --- Martin 000-28EC

Gibson LP Studio Premium Plus - Danelectro U2
0

#15 User is offline   Spot 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1193
  • Joined: 18-February 08
  • LocationLondres

Posted 05 January 2011 - 10:44 AM

I got an even cheaper "tone" tip,....loose the pick and grow your finger nails!!!!!

\:D/
Guitars

'58 LG-2 w/
Bob Colosi Black Buffalo Horn Bridge pins
'60 ES-125T
'63 Country Western
'64 J-50 w
/ Bob Colosi Bone Bridge pins
'79 ES-335 TD

'82 Epi Sheraton (MIJ)
'97 Epi Sheraton II (USA)

'49 Martin 00-17 w
/ Bob Colosi Bone Bridge pins


..........................................................and a few Harmony's
0

#16 User is offline   Jinder 

  • Every one a Gibsonite!
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1112
  • Joined: 02-January 08
  • LocationDorset, UK

Posted 14 January 2011 - 08:22 AM

Here is what I use:

Acoustics & Archtops: Martin PB 12-54s

My 118yr old Lyon & Healy Parlour: Martin Silk & Steels

Electrics: Ernie Ball 11s (for Teles, Strats etc) or Ernie Ball Skinny Top Heavy Bottoms (for Les Pauls)

Classical: Dell'Arte Hard Tension

Coated strings are great, but my problem is I play hard with a heavy pick, so tend to break strings before they lose tone...so, as you can imagine, I don't get the benefit from coated strings that others do...having said that, I'll slap a set of Elixirs on my Kalamazoo archtop next time I change strings, as that one gets played more gently and less frequently than my others.

I'm intrigued to try those Newtone Heritage strings on my old Lyon & Healy, I reckon that could be a nice compromise between Silk & Steel and my normal strings...
#######
2002 Advanced Jumbo
2009 L-00 Blues King
1893 Lyon & Healy 'Arion' Parlour
2011 Epiphone EJ200
1995 Epiphone Les Paul Goldtop (on long-term loan)
1998 LAG Roxane RM200
Fender Deluxe amp.

#######
www.jinder.co.uk
www.facebook.com/jindermusic
0

#17 User is offline   nodehopper 

  • Hack Player Extraordinaire
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 755
  • Joined: 26-December 07
  • LocationForesthill

Posted 14 January 2011 - 10:46 AM

 Jinder, on 14 January 2011 - 08:22 AM, said:



I'm intrigued to try those Newtone Heritage strings on my old Lyon & Healy, I reckon that could be a nice compromise between Silk & Steel and my normal strings...


Jinder...Maybe OneWilyFool will chime in or send him a PM. He is the one that got me to try those. They sound very good and really last a long time. OWF uses them on his 1890 Bruno guitar and they really bring out the tone on it.
Stephen ...... "Ain't no more potatoes, the frost have killed the vine ......
Well, the blues ain't nothin' but a good woman on your mind" MJH



John How - LBC --- Gibson CJ-165 --- Washburn R316

Martin 000-15S --- Martin 000-28EC

Gibson LP Studio Premium Plus - Danelectro U2
0

#18 User is offline   onewilyfool 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5925
  • Joined: 28-December 07

Posted 14 January 2011 - 05:42 PM

Hi Jinder, Newtone strings (fabrique en Angleterre) are great strings, they are all made with round core, so no hex core to build up oils and dirt. The Heritage are GREAT string for vintage parlor guitars that can't take the stress of full tension strings.....they are in 10, 11, &12 guage, each set pulling a different tension. One interesting thing about the Heritage strings, they are designed to apply equal tension to each string......no one string pulls harder, so no tendency to twist the neck. I started with 10's on my two parlors, but went up to 11's on one of them. These strings last and last and last.......round core again.....try them out......here they are about $13/set, pricey, but again, they last longer than Elixirs even. Good luck....

An example of one year old strings on my Bruno:



 nodehopper, on 14 January 2011 - 10:46 AM, said:

Jinder...Maybe OneWilyFool will chime in or send him a PM. He is the one that got me to try those. They sound very good and really last a long time. OWF uses them on his 1890 Bruno guitar and they really bring out the tone on it.

"The sole of my shoes is thin, and I'll soon be on my feet again" Lonnie Johnson
0

#19 User is offline   Ildedoni 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 25-January 11

Posted 25 January 2011 - 11:05 AM

Hi, I've a 2010 j45 and I'm changing it's original pins for Colosi's bone pins. Does anybody knows what is the proper size for replacement?
Many thanks
R
0

#20 User is offline   57classic 

  • Wicked Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1086
  • Joined: 12-July 10
  • LocationThe Hub

Posted 25 January 2011 - 01:13 PM

OWF I really liked your rendition and your guitar's tone is brilliant
Gibson ES-339
Gibson Les Paul Studio 50's Tribute Goldtop
Gibson J45 Custom
Eastman E6OM
Victoria 5112
Weber Mini Mass Attenuator
Maxon OD 808

0

Share this topic:


  • (5 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users