Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

this looks edible


jefleppard

Recommended Posts

If I'm not mistaken I think there were black finished runs in the archtop

but only special limited runs of them were produced. Either way that

guitar would look nice under the tree!

 

I'll have to do some more investigating on the limited run finish, I also

thought they were only produced normally in natural and sunburst.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, they did make black ones off and on. One can only guess why; maybe they had some monkeyed-up sunbursts or some particularly ugly wood.... Dare I even think they might have had some three piece tops? Probably not, but it's plausible and would justify an opaque finish.

 

A few years ago there was a black 16" Gibson archtop on gbase and the seller claimed it was a "Special No. something-or-other" made for the 1940 Christmas season. It was all black, austere, and may have had non-catalogued features.... a stenciled logo with a firestripe pickguard, dot inlays with pearl logo and NO pickguard.... the possibilites are endless. Point is, it was cranked out as a short run so it didn't necessarily meet the specs of a standard model.

 

Hard to say how many of these things are out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mmmmmm. Me likey dark chock-lit! [-(

 

I seem to recall reading somewhere that back in the day spruce with any kind of not so straight grain was relegated to braces, kerfing and kindling wood. It was an old luthier's belief that wavering grain was not good for tone. Gibson didn't totally believe this. Therefore they covered some non-compliant grain with their signature burst while outfits like Martin were throwing away perfectly usable spruce. Could be the black ones had a blemish that a burst couldn't cover... or maybe they did use 3 piece tops in limited circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...