Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Silversurfer

Members
  • Posts

    49
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

17 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Stunning. The Les Paul Custom headstock inlay is a nice touch. Congrats!
  2. If you just clean it with a damp cloth, it won’t make it glossy. But if you WANT to make it shinier,, if you used a cleaner like Virtuoso or a compound like Meguiar’s Ultimate Compound applied by hand and put some effort into it, followed by a good polish, it will definitely get shinier. It just won’t be as shiny as a full gloss finish.
  3. Here’s my 106 year old Gibson L-1. And it’s a guitar, 😆
  4. Yes, you can do that to see if you like it before pulling the whole thing out. You’ll just need a slightly taller saddle. There are lots of non UST pickup options from K&K, Schatten, Dazo and now the LR Baggs HiFi.
  5. Amazing and depressing at the same time. Man, I gotta practice more…
  6. Exactly. Better to play it often and make music, than worry about keeping it pristine.
  7. I highly doubt there’s water vapor or anything else under the finish and it doesn’t make sense that it would just coincidentally be in the same exact spot as your forearm (it would be in a variety of places). If Virtuoso cleaner doesn’t take care of it, try a light compound like Meguiar’s Ultimate Compound, applied by hand. But having that forearm haze is just the nature of having a nitro finish. You can keep cleaning it, but it will just keep coming back. Just play the damn thing.
  8. Waverly. But you’ll need to use the conversion bushings and polish out the raccoon eyes on the face of the headstock by hand using Scratch-X, followed by Meguiar’s Ultimate Compound, and then polish. If you’re patient and careful, it comes out well. I did this on my J-45 Standard.
  9. It’s not a big deal. Use some virtuoso cleaner and it’ll be good as new.
  10. I’m a big Gibson fan and I love having a piece of its history as I’m sure you do, too.. Hope you enjoy them!
  11. Congrats! I have a 1917 L-1. Looks like yours is in better shape than mine. But my L-1 still plays well for a 107 year old. My guitar has a giant V neck, does yours?
  12. So I just saw an ad posted for an Atkin J43 (apologies if I’m using your images) and from photos, it looks just like the orange peeled finish on the new Gibson historic reissues. Can anyone confirm? https://reverb.com/item/78303211-atkin-j43-aged-2023
  13. Hard to tell from the photos but looks like some finish was removed when removing and regluing the bridge? Or is that just dried glue? Have you tried cleaning the area? If it really bothers you, it can be touched up but I wouldn’t bother. Bridge reglues, neck resets, refrets, nut replacement… it’s all part of guitar ownership.
  14. Well, the good news is that they all seem to be pretty consistent, unlike some of the other Historics like J-45s or Advanced Jumbos where there seems to be much more variance.
  15. In all seriousness, the LR Baggs Element UST ISN’T paper thin and your action will definitely be lowered if you remove it. It’s also a braided wire that has a bit of “give” to it when compressed, unlike the Fishman UST which is more of a hard wire. Some people will argue that you can’t hear the difference in removing a UST from under the saddle, but I could. Your experience may be different.
×
×
  • Create New...