Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Jørg Baermann

All Access
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Some of those who actually own one or two are pretty happy with them, plays well but takes some time to learn using the electronics is what they claim. There is a problem in destroying them like it was done too, at least they could have been taken apart for recycling.
  2. Well, healthy businesses do just that since it only is a matter of having less inventory for when the tax bill has to be made. They could also have done it like Peavy is doing it with their US inventory. And as others mentioned, what a waste of resources, especially when it comes to those that are restricted, looked like perfect rosewood boards on them ES models.
  3. Profit would have been the same if they had donated them away, doesn’t hurt a tax writeoff the slightest. Only reason not to is shameful lazyness.
  4. He doesn’t feel cheated because he got a good guitar build upon personal preferences for as much as he could afford. As one of the Fender customshop builders said, there goes some more time into details besides having the option to make it as custom as the customer want’s it to be. That doesn’t mean that MIM strats are worse, the same builder was even quite surprised when he was presented with cheaper strats that got the Squier label on the headstock, and even told how these can be made more on pair with a bit of work on details.
×
×
  • Create New...