Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Ed Zeplin

All Access
  • Posts

    626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Ed Zeplin

  1. 5 minutes ago, Peter reilly said:

    Owner did acknowledge the replaced bridge.  Not to be contrary but how could it be a 70's guitar with the frets joined at the 16th fret?  From '68 to the end of the run in '72 it was joined at the 19th.

    Maybe with it being a full hollow body they used bushings to screw the bridge studs into. Hope it works out for you. 

  2. 9 minutes ago, Peter reilly said:

    I do see thats very helpful.  So it is likely the bridge was replaced

     

     

    The bridges aren’t interchangeable. The Nashville bridge studs screw into bushings that are a installed into the guitar body. The ABR1 studs screw directly into the top wood. I suspect that this is not a 60s guitar but a 70s guitar since it appears to have bushings for the studs to screw in to. 

  3. Take a look at the bridge. The one in the picture you posted is wider allowing more travel for the saddles which they started using after the move to Nashville mid 70s, hence the term Nashville bridge. The one on Reverb is narrower and looks like an ABR1. 

  4. 59 minutes ago, Dub-T-123 said:

    I don’t think the dates from that time period are very accurate on this site. I joined around 2006 here and there was a big forum crash some time around 2008 maybe. It used to say the date each member joined the forum and I remember the date on my page changed by a couple years when the forum crash happened 

    Thats right. I had been a member since about 2003 and something happened and all the old posts were lost. There were some great people here back then. May have been a format change that contributed to that. 

  5. 1 hour ago, jedzep said:

    OK Ed, I'm shamed. I had to at least paint the dang wall. Tomorrow I'm going to my old barn loft and hunt for boards. You give new meaning to the term 'Wall of Sound'.
    9zutGpe.jpg


    Thanks so much. I had a plain gray wall for ten years and this past November we had the house painted. I didnt want to do the same old thing plus not enough studs to safely screw in to for the spacing I needed. Thought about a nice oak slab but we found an antique wood supplier about ten minutes from home and very reasonably priced, $5/sq.ft. I am eastern Ontario, east of Toronto. The barn was built in 1915. We are very happy with it. Lots of Irish coffee consumed in that room in the morning with its southern exposure. 
     

    Good luck with your endeavors.

  6. 2 hours ago, ghost_of_fl said:
    Ladies hold the aces
    And their lovers call it passion
    The men call it pleasure
    But to me it's old fashioned
    Times they're a changin'
    Nothin' ever stands still
    If I don't stop changin'
    I'll be writin' out my will


    No More No More

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. I've always been partial to Les Pauls, and considered them my #1 go-to axe. However, I've wanted an ES335 since I first played one in 1969, but could never bring myself to part with the $3000 + that they want for them. In 1993, I bought my first Epiphone Dot at a yard say for $75 w/ hardshell case. Needless to say, I didn't haggle. In 2001, a friend who owns a music store sat me down blindfolded and gave me an ES and a Dot to play. I couldn't discern the difference and promtly bought my second Dot. I have since owned two more (4 altogether). One I purchased from Musician's Friend and when I ordered it, I called the company about the difference between the Dot and the ES. As luck would have it, there was a Gibson Rep at MF that I talked to and was informed that depending on year and model they ranged from no difference at all to negligible differences, mostly in pickup quality and/or tuners, which are both easy fixes. But the stripped down versions are identical and in some cases (again, depending on year and model) EXACTLY (other than headstock) identical.

     

    I consider this to be the definitive info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibson_ES-335

     

    So you are saying there are no differences between the Gibson and Epi models aside from tuners and pickups? What about wood and build quality? And nothing on Wikipedia is definitive.

  8. The above statement is 100% FALSE. No Epiphone guitar is made of layered wood. The only models that may be made of what is properly called 'laminate' would be the lowest end of the line with bolt on necks, and the double neck 1275. If you purchase any set neck Les Paul or SG, you have a true solid body guitar. Even more so than a Gibson as Epis are not weight relieved, other than the Ultra series LP which is chambered by design.

     

    That depends whether you consider veneers to be layers.

     

    They use veneers on top and bottom so who knows what is in the middle. Epiphone used luan in guitars before which a former member here said was another species of mahogany.

  9.  

     

    Yes if we take it to the realms that Buzz Feitin does. But for us ordinary mortals with ordinary nuts, I'd still stand by the usual method of having the strings leave the nut at the edge by the fretboard.

     

    My wife said my nuts were extraordinary.

     

    That being said I just checked the intonation on my Casino, LP and SG and they are spot on across the board open, 12th fretted note and 12th fret harmonic which is what I strive for when setting up. But I would tend to accept the fretted notes as opposed to harmonics since that is what I will be playing. I also check the tuning of individual notes at various points on the neck to validate.

     

    Another thing I do is use the D 12th harmonic and compare with the D on the G string, 7 th fret and B string, 3rd fret as a check since these strings tend to go out of tune more easily.

×
×
  • Create New...