Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

E-minor7

All Access
  • Posts

    10,694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by E-minor7

  1. They were right. Not sure if he was one of few, but Starr was immaculately good. Yet not a typhoon which became more and more attractive plus minus 1970 and onwards.
  2. Absolutely - and this is probably 1963. Never seen this particular shot before. My father came home with the She Loves You/I'll Get You single for me and they wore the same lapel-less suits on the front. Don't forget the ultra-kool mid-phase btw. The looser or freer not yet hippie-style 1965-66.
  3. ๐Ÿ˜† Out on thin ice there. Guess the Fabs laughed their caps off. .
  4. I would like to know how you as a sax-player (and perhaps colleagues) characterize The Beatles' relation to the saxophone.
  5. Heps for a weighty comment. Maybe you should post it in the Lounge-thread Do the Beatles music hold up to modern music also. The whole copyright issue is always a serious territory to enter. I remember reading a CSN&Y book, which also had a diary-like calendar. It informed about how the guys registered just after writing, not releasing a song. Probably so they could play it live - but also so that no jerk would steal the melody while recording. SO many ways things can leak from that vulnerable phase. .
  6. Okay - still according to the famous Polecastro-film, the X is placed on the same spot while the rest of the top-braces differ.
  7. Yeah, , , but it also shows HOW good their early stuff was. .
  8. And through the time machinery >>>>>>>
  9. I'd like to ask a thing : Will the sound go muddy/unclear (a bit rubberband-like๐Ÿฅบ) when the strings on your HD-28 fades. Happens with my HD-28V - otherwise a topz-magnificent guitar.
  10. I was there - but very young, , , still had and enjoyed the records. You probably won't be able to imagine how big they were. That means everywhere - also in the camps that didn't understand or like them. When Alfred himself joins the wave there not much left to discuss - says it all. Don't know what he thought of the band, but he sure drummed the vibe up. . .
  11. Very good - and it offers a little platform for afterthought, doesn't it. .
  12. Might grow on you - did on me. My prob is the production = Too much soup 1/3 in and through out. As we acoustic players know, music not least arises in the pausing. And where are those Paul & (cleaned-up) John uni-vocals we treasure so much, , , plus a clear George signature to be found. All in all I let my ๐Ÿ’š win though. It's the path to choose here. . .
  13. Thing is that it's more than a band - much more. This happens when a rock-act gets big enough. A handful of groups managed to get there over the years. .
  14. video features a (for me) never before seen Gibson ~ , , , , , in their hands.
  15. There it was - one can hear OWF sensed the old tune. Knew what it is about.
  16. Well, an ambivalence lies between the lines. One can sense they've had enough, , , of each other too. The glasses are full - or empty. . This in fact can be seen as a great cadeau to Stones.
  17. Yes - and a good player/singer too. Delivered a fair version of Yesterday. D'you remember he began some bar gigs in his later days. We followed them here. .
  18. Puzzles me you don't mention the saddle, which would be 1st priority when adjusting for cleaner intonation. Do you mean saddle when saying bridge. Btw. checked my Birds and they don't have the prob. Even though I sanded the saddles several times over the years. . Have to add I never encountered the theme, EA - the contemporary Gibsons here are very well working. Some of the oldies however had a few issues - but also here'n'there in the low 3 or 5 first frets sector.
×
×
  • Create New...