Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

28 Neutral

About SlashPerryBurst

  • Rank
    Thin Lizzy fan
  • Birthday 05/26/1987

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    From Glasgow, Living in Tokyo
  1. I had a '61 RI SG stolen after rehearsals once. And I was careful. I left it with three guys who were in the same band as me at the time. They obviously weren't paying attention. It was my first Gibson too... I got myself a LP to replace it a few weeks later though.
  2. Why do you even need a neck? A luthier I know of can accept custom orders online, but prefers it when people come into his shop so he can measure their hands to get the neck right for them.
  3. The guitars in that room were borrowed from "Norman's rare guitars" which is a rare and expensive guitar store in California. They have new and reasonably priced guitars too, but you can be sure if you stop in there, there will be some very nice and expensive vintage guitars.
  4. True, but it will only take a (careful) slight modification to the interior of the case for it to fit perfectly. Put it this way, the case isn't going to be too small now is it?
  5. I used to be the proud owner of a Les Paul standard goldtop with P90's. Hard to find (without resorting to custom shop) but if you can find one, I highly recommend it. Wish I still had mine.
  6. Pure guesswork here, but judging from these pictures, The guitars look like they have the same dimensions. Either way, there is extra space in the headstock section of the case if necessary, but they appear to be the same size. I'm guessing it would fit just fine.
  7. I remember a few years ago, I was playing a gig. One of the bands on the same bill as us had played on the same bill as us several times. The band were okay, but their guitarist was an arrogant sod. Which was ironic, because he could barely play. Anyway, midway through their set (we were on next), I was having a beer and was standing up front watching them. The guitarist broke a string and didn't have another guitar. He started shouting at me "give me your guitar". If I hadn't hated this guy, I might have helped him out, but I said no. He was furious. He had to play the rest of the gig with a string missing and severe tuning issues as a result. The promoter came up to me and asked me why I didn't give him my guitar. I told the promoter that my guitars were expensive and that he treated his guitars very badly... Which is true. After his gig, he was fuming. Especially when he realized that I had both of my les pauls there that night.
  8. I'm aware of that, but it's like comparing apples and oranges. The plane landing at bhutan will be very lazy (handling wise) in comparison to the nimble fighter jet.
  9. Fenderguy, you don't loan guitars. You borrow them. Loan implies that you give it to someone else. As for me, I've let a few of my friends play my guitars, but only ones who know what they were doing. I also taught my wife a few chords. My father (who was very critical of me when I bought my first guitar) bought himself one 5 years ago and doesn't play it, so I was happy to tell him that my wife knew more chords than him. Other than that, I haven't given anyone one of my guitars, except a former bandmate of mine. A few guitars have changed hands between us over the years, in particular, one beautiful goldtop with P90's which he sold to me to finance some travels. I later sold it back to him to finance my travels. Still want it back.
  10. That video is crazy. My wife wants to go to Bhutan. Maybe I should show her that video. When I was a kid, I was in the ATC (air training corps) aka, the Air Cadets. Part of that involved flying lessons but that video was scary. In all fairness, the technology the fighter pilots have at their disposal is far better and more responsive. This is like comparing a slow, difficult to handle truck with an F1 car. One thing that I've always been curious about is when the shuttle pilots dock with the ISS. I'm guessing that is a lot harder. Especially when you consider that the guys in your video were probably candidates for Nasa at some point.
  11. Sorry Rabs, beat you to it here.
  12. I have also had a varied amount of guitars over the years. However, since I got my first LP, it's kind of ruined other guitars for me. I'm also a fan of SG's, but they do feel like toys compared to an LP imo. Guess I just got used to the LP and everything else paled in comparison. It's not a bad thing, it's just the guitar for me. But I'm growing increasingly concerned by the lack of a true solidbody option. I'm in Japan now, and there are many high end Tokai's that are made just the way I like them and are still cheaper than a Gibson. I really hope Henry realizes that there are many of us out there who love the weight of the Les Paul. Instead, we just get told how the weight relieved and chambered ones are better. They aren't to me. Maybe some day, when I can afford custom shop prices, I'll bite, but for now I may stick to the secondhand market, or look at companies like Tokai. Having played Gibson r8's and r9's, the difference between them and a high end Tokai is negligible... The only big difference is the price. Of course, my stance on the matter isn't being helped by the fact that, in addition to the secondhand aged white 68 RI custom that I've been eyeing up, I'm also gassing for a LP Trad pro and LP classic custom.
  13. Keep looking. The perfect Les Paul is out there for you. Yes, some are a little suspect in quality, but the good ones, aren't overpriced at all. Find yourself a perfect one and it will be the best $3000 dollars you have spent. As for PRS V Gibson, I'm originally from the UK, and PRS are generally more expensive across the board than Gibson in the UK. Assumed it was the same elsewhere.
  14. Interesting that you consider Gibsons overpriced yet you like PRS. The (IMHO) superior build quality on a good LP can't be beat in my opinion. Each to their own I suppose. There's nothing like a good Les Paul in my opinion. A good SG is nice too. I remember a few years ago, the SG special (not faded) were selling new for £500. A genuine, premium quality guitar made in America for £500. The lack of a hard case helped explain the price, but it was still a bargain if you ask me. I wish I snapped a few of them up. A friend of mine bought one of those SG specials and even talked the dealer down to £430. That SG was almost as good as the '61 reissue I'd had stolen a few years before and was less than half the price. I briefly owned it and it was an amazing guitar.
  15. I don't mind the old weight relief so much as it wasn't too bad. I'd prefer guitars without it though. I personally think the chambered Lp's were ridiculous. How they can still claim it is a solid body guitar when the guitar is so severely hollowed out. I don't mind Gibson making them as heavy guitars aren't anyones cup of tea, but I'd at least like the option of a proper solid guitar without having to pay custom shop prices. Instead, Gibson USA LP's are either chambered or weight relieved. Gibson constantly like to tell us that this is better, but don't seem to think of those of us who like the weight (And I know a lot of people who do). Nor do they seem to think of those who play hard rock. Chambered guitars aren't as good as the solid variety for that kind of music Having spent most of my guitar playing life with Les Pauls, I have become accustomed to the weight. It took a little adjustment at first, but now I love the weight of the LP. Every other guitar out there feels like a toy around my shoulders. Now I find myself in a position where some of the old weight relieved LP's are heavy enough for my liking, but most LP's are far too light. Why should I spend custom shop prices when I could buy a used 70's model in good condition for far cheaper? If Gibson wants to keep my business, the least they can do is make a certain percentage of their guitars solid and clearly mark them as such. For example, Les Paul traditional (S), Les Paul traditional (CH), Les Paul traditional (WR).
  • Create New...