Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

rar

Members
  • Content Count

    1,724
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

rar last won the day on April 22 2012

rar had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

108 Good

About rar

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    SF Bay Area, CA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Standard AJs have gotten Gotohs. "Deluxe" AJs -- Luthier's Choice models, for example -- have typically come with Waverleys. -- Bob R
  2. I doubt there's much risk here. The edge of the registration hole is probably harder than the maple, thanks to the adhesive, so it seems unlikely that ball ends sitting in or near the hole will cause excessive wear. But I guess we'll find out. -- Bob R
  3. No, they said that excessive bridge plate wear would be repaired under warranty. But I think you missed the main point, which is that they believe there is no actual problem here, structural or tonal, and they're not going to spend any money changing the production line to "fix" a non-problem. (That the bridge plate looks kind of funky to the tiny number of goof balls like us who carefully examine the innards of their guitars does not count as a problem. :) ) They're backing that belief by a promise to do a "fix" (including who knows how many expensive warranty repairs ) if they're wrong
  4. Hate to pick on anything in your nice explanation, but there are actually two registration holes on the bottom-side of the fretboard and two matching holes in the neck. The dowels inserted in these ensure accurate location of the fretboard relative to the neck. Also, you neglected to mention that both Josh (the acting GM) and Don explicitly said that they do not believe that the current design will result in excessive bridge plate wear but, if they're wrong, "Gibson will take care of the problem for you [owners]". -- Bob R
  5. No. It looks like finish checking due to differential shrinkage. BTW, the whole idea of stealing the inlay and replacing it with counterfeit doesn't make any sense, economically. -- Bob R
  6. Evidently Steve traded all his Gibsons in toward Martins at Matt Umanov's after moving to New York. But then New York does have strange effects on some folks. No idea how he got picked to write the Foreword. I agree that he was never "iconically Gibson" in the way that some other artists are. -- Bob R
  7. For "casual" use with guitars, I'd think you'd want a non-invasive hydrometer capable of measuring the moisture content of thin wooden plates (such as a guitar top). Most hydrometers are designed to measure the moisture content somewhat below the surface, which would mean that you'd have to measure at the neck block (or some other place that is relatively substantial). If I were in the market for one, I guess I'd check with the major manufactures -- explain the application and ask them what model, if any, was appropriate. -- Bob R
  8. The main text appears to be a photo reproduction of a late printing of the first edition. The main differences are that the foreword by Stan Werblin was replaced by a new foreword by Steve Earle, the Acknowledgements were reset (but seem to be the same), an Appendix that consists of a 16 page table "Gibson Models Produced in Bozeman, Montana, 1989 to 2008" -- no production numbers, but an 'X' entry if the model was produced that year -- was added at the end, and the authors bios were updated. Far from the comprehensive revision and update that was planned prior to David's passing. -- Bob
  9. I don't know about techies, but they have them at the Gibson plant. The main use is to check the moisture levels of woods in store to make sure they're ready for use. They also check whether guitars that have apparently been improperly humidified, based on the damage they exhibit, have actually been mistreated or not. I remember a case a few years ago on the forum where someone swore up and down that his guitar had been kept between 45% and 50% humidity at all times, and so the problems he was seeing could not possibly be due to low humidity. The guitar was at the factory when I visit
  10. Too late to worry about this now, but ... The finish wasn't fully buffed out on these. After a year or two of normal cleaning -- just an occasional wipe with a clean flannel or microfiber cloth after playing -- the finish winds up looking quite shiny and rather vintage-like. But this one appears to have been sitting in the case since 2007. Actually, it looks a lot like this one might have the finish over the pickguard and is suffering the problems associated with that -- see one of the zillions of past threads on the subject -- though I didn't think that was done on any after the
  11. Most are disposed of, but Hogeye rescued one that was in relatively good shape. A bunch of us who have been to Bozeman, for a Homecoming or some other reason, have had a chance to play it. -- Bob R
  12. He's had a bunch of J-45s during the '90s and since. He plays them for awhile until they get too beat-up for him -- which only takes him a few years -- then sends them back to Gibson telling them he needs a new one. Since they're just "regular" J-45s, there's no obvious way to tell them apart. -- Bob R
  13. I think tvguit covered everything but the factory. There was only one Gibson factory, the one on Parsons St in Kalamazoo, in 1958. -- Bob R
  14. You could chech the serial number with Gibson for confirmation, but these photos show a genuine '92 J-200 (in my humble non-professional opinion). -- Bob R
×
×
  • Create New...