Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums


All Access
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sbpark

  1. I didn't fill the old holes with anything, just left them open. The original holes are covered by the current tuners and really don't see leaving them open/unplugged an issue.
  2. Sounds awesome! I'd be interested in hearing just the iRig pickup by itself as well.
  3. Although I'm not a fan of this and wouldn't do it to my own J45 (or any other guitar I own) and prefer to spend my time playing my guitars and complaining on Internet forums, I do respect the fact that it's his guitar to do whatever he wants to it. As far as reselling it for decent price, who said he's selling the guitar?! I think there are more people on Internet forums that are more concerned and put more effort into worrying about what the resale value of their guitars are more than they actually spend playing them. The way I see it is yes, IF he ends up selling it down the line eh will most likely take a hit on resale. However, if he enjoyed the guitar while he owned it and it brought him joy and pleasure and he made good music with I during that time, that may in itself be worth the hit he takes. Also, by sort of personalizing the guitar and making into what he thinks is closer to his ideal guitar, he may be less inclined to sell it and it may become a keeper. Also, some people get joy and pleasure out of tinkering and modding as much or sometimes more than playing, and resale value is of little importance to them, and it's more about the experience. There's more to owning guitars than their prospected resale value down the line, but if resale value is one of your major concerns, who am I to judge? As you yourself did say, "it's his to let him do as he wishes", and I extend the same sentiment to you regarding focusing more on resale value than other aspects of guitar ownership.
  4. Sal- I've had the Klusons #-on-a-plate tuners on my J45 now for almost 2 months and they work great and have no complaints at all. They're smooth, and work as they should. I also just like the look of the buttons on the Klusons the best. They aren't stark white, They're kind of opaque, and have edges that are a little softer than others out there. I ordered an extra set just in case they do become a little harder to find in the future and/or if I acquire another Gibson acoustic that I'd like to put them on. The other added bonus is the guitar is ridiculously light now after the tuner swap and replacing the Baggs UST with a K&K. Clocks in at exactly 4lbs. The only down side I see to the three on a plate tuners is if one gets damaged or develops issues you have to replace the entire side and would have to buy an entire new set. With the individual tuners you would most likely still have to buy an entire set, but you only have to replace the one faulty tuner and can hang onto the rest as spares if any of the other tuners break or fail down the line.
  5. Let's see those new tuners as well and how the headstock came out after getting rid of the Rotomatics.
  6. I think it sounds more like opening the oven to check on an apple pie that's baking.
  7. This type of finish does have the potential to look pretty nice, very similar to the way the finish is on the J45 Vintage model. I think it would look better though if the OP spent a little more time getting out more of the scratches from sanding before applying the wax. To my eye it kind of looks like you took a Scotch-Bite pad to the guitar then just waxed over the scratches. Wonder if you could have obtained a finer finish with some super fine wet sanding or super fine steel wool, then lightly hand-buffed it just to get out this scratches, then applied the wax. Also would help to better see the guitar if you posted some pics taking better pictures, like more "head-on" pictures looking directly at the front and back of the guitar instead of these vague, off-angle shots that make it difficult to really see what you did with the finish.
  8. So you don't want an Adirondack top, but you want everything else the Vintage model has, but only want to pay for it what a Standard model costs. We all would, but keep dreaming! Again, it makes no sense from a marketing standpoint for Gibson to do that with what they have going for them with the Vintage and Standard J45 models (but then again, making changes that make no sense from a marketing standpoint has never stopped Gibson in the past...am I right?!) Plenty of expensive guitars use and have used plastic bridge pins. Martin was using plastic in the 50's, and I think Gibson was as well. My D-35 has plastic bridge pins, and my 1975 D-28 still has the original plastic pins. Just spend a couple hundred bucks and turn a Standard into the guitar you're describing. You can easily, and for relatively little money do everything you've mentioned (except for the string spacing). I did just that with my J45 Standard. 3-on-a-plate tuners, bone nut and saddle, bone pins, V/TV pickguard and ditched the Baggs UST for a K&K. Heck, you've mentioned that you live to modify your guitars, evidenced by putting in a bit of work to dull their finishes, so souping up your J45 to exactly what you want should be super easy to do. Yes you've already made the guitar yours with the finish. So why not go the extra mile and finish the job? Honestly, it's not that much work, and you're still in it for a ton less than a Vintage model. Sell the Baggs pickup and Rotomatics and you can cover a large chunk of the cost of the K&K. All I know is after making the changes I made to my 2017 J45 Standard that I bought new in 2016 for a bit under $2k I still would take it over any of the other J45's I've owned, including TV and V models.
  9. That hog J45 sounds really, really nice!
  10. Gibson already makes this J45. It's called the Vintage model. You gotta pay to play. If Gibson made these changes to the Standard the only big difference between the Vintage and Standard models would be the torrified top, and that doesn't really make good marketing sense for Gibson, does it? Seems like the Vintage model is a hit and they sell those, (and for a nice profit I'm sure), and for the rest of us who don't want to shell out for, or just can't afford the Vintage model, there's the Standard. I also disagree that "most" people swap out the Rotomatics. Many voice their dislike for the Rotomatics, but few here on this forum have actually done it, and more talk about wanting to, but outside of this tiny forum and in the rest of guitar land, I'd say more people have left the stock Rotomatics on the guitar. I'm not saying it's not done, but it's probably not done as much as you think. Gibson adding a K&K wouldn't make sense either. Why would they superglue a pickup to the bridge plate at the factory? This could lead to decreased sales since not everyone is a fan of, or has an application that the K&K would be practical for and would be very expensive and labor intensive to remove. At least with the LR Baggs UST it's ridiculously easy to remove, and can also easy be put back in to return the guitar to stock. As far as the string spacing goes, I haven't heard that many complain about the current string spacing, but that's a personal preference. I've owned J45 Standards, J45 True Vintages and a J45 Vintage. I could swear the string spacing at the bridge was the same on all of them, but don't quote me on that, but they all felt just fine to me for fingerpicking and cross picking. The thing about threads like this is the person starting the thread is just thinking about what THEY would like, without taking into consideration the perspective of the company. I get it. Sure, these changes would be nice for the Standard model, but if this configuration already exists in a more expensive package and it's selling (Vintage model) and they're also selling a differently appointed version for less that is still a great guitar (Standard) why would they change the less expensive version into something that's basically what the more expensive version is, then sell it for less?! There is also the "Gibson Custom Shop Made 2 Measure" program that could make you whatever you wanted.
  11. I hear you on the gold tuners. The fact that the dealer wouldn't budge off of MSRP and the gold is what made me not pull the trigger, but the one I played really was wonderful.
  12. What tuners are you swapping out? I just took a screen shot of this off the StewMac site: Maybe you need these, but seems a little strange if your guitar has Rotomatics. They're a little larger diameter. https://www.stewmac.com/Hardware_and_Parts/Tuning_Machines/Tuner_Parts/10_5mm_Round_Conversion_Bushings.html
  13. Wrong in what way? Too big? Too small? The bushings that come with the tuners won't fit. They'll slop around because of the holes left by the Rotomatics. That's why you have to buy the conversion bushings separately. What tuners are on your guitar now? Something different than Rotomatics perhaps that require a different size conversion bushing? The bushings I purchased were definitely the 3/8" conversion bushings from StewMac (just checked my order history) and they fit my guitar (2017 J45 Standard). They just required a small bit of reaming to press-fit them in, which is how they are designed to work. They aren't supposed to just drop right in or be loose because that can cause rattles. They're supposed to be press-fit. Here's the StewMac link: https://www.stewmac.com/Hardware_and_Parts/Tuning_Machines/Tuner_Parts/3_8_Conversion_Tuner_Bushing.html
  14. I can play and post about it, don't you worry!
  15. Both of those guitars sound great. I played a all-mahogany J45 that looks just like the one you have there; natural finish, gold tuners, etc. and it sounded AMAZING, but the shop that had it were selling it for (in my opinion) way too much and wouldn't budge off of MSRP. So I ended up finding the other version of the all-hog J45 in a burst (basically looks like a J45 Standard, but the top burst is a little darker due to the mahogany top) and ordered one for a great price. Big disappointment when it arrived and sounded dull and lifeless. For an all-mahogany guitar I really think it's tough to beat the Martin 000-15M. These really are such sweet, versatile and beautiful sounding guitars. If the 1 11/16" nut is too narrow, LA Guitar Sales does a CS version with a 1 3/4" nut and also does it in a gloss finish for a little more $$$, but they really are stellar. Not knocking the all-hog J45's because, as I mentioned I think they can sound great as well. The one that sounded great is hard to describe. It sounded like a J45, but was just a little warmer and lusher and more polite that a Standard J45/J50. Paired really well with the human voice, but you do lose just a little of the mid-range articulation and note separation you get with the spruce top. Not better or worse, just different!
  16. Agree 100%. I use GB for just laying down quick ideas/demos and use Logic Pro for more polished recordings. Both platforms are very useful and have their place.
  17. Thats just another reason not to use Elixrs.
  18. I'm someone who thinks dulling a guitars finish is a waste of time and effort, but I just basically overhauled my J45 with new tuners, removed the OEM pickup and installed a K&K, replaced the "flubber" Pickguard that kept peeling off, and had a bone nut and saddle made. Plenty of people would think that was a waste of time and money as well. And I wholeheartedly welcome comments from anyone who thinks that's the case. Those people are entitled to voicing their opinions, which dont matter to me because I like the results and the way the guitar turned out. My point being, if I didn't want to read negative comments or replies from people who disagreed with me, I wouldn't have started a thread explaining what I did to the guitar and posting pics of it. Instead of getting super defensive about why you like a duller finish, how many records you've recorded, how much you play your guitars vs how much time is spent sanding them (maybe that's a new subset of guitar ownership...some are players, others working/performing musicians, some are collectors, and other are...sanders!) instead grow a thicker skin and worry less about what others think and focus more on the people who reply offering advice and support.
  19. I understand what you're saying here, and can see both sides to the debate. I'll start by saying that first, these are Internet forums, and if it weren't for different opinions and people voicing them, these would be even more boring places to visit and be participating in! I also have no problem with someone disagreeing with me and voicing that in a thread. It's their right to. Sure, many may come across as (with full intent or not) as being very judgmental or self-righteous, and for sure there are many who just want to troll and poke the bee's nest with a pointy stick, but when people make comments like that it says more about them than it does about the OP of the thread. The thing is, if you want to be able to ask opinions and get advice, you have to take the good with the bad and understand that not everyone is going to agree with you or support you, and many may even have a contradictory opinion or viewpoint. There's nothing wrong with disagreeing with someone or having a different opinion, it's more about how they phrase it, but the guy who doesn't like relic'ing or altering the finishes on guitars and prefers to pay them has just as much right to voice his/her opinion as the OP does in starting the topic in favor of it. Just be glad this isn't the AGF! They're posting threads about $400 guitar chairs, worrying about if they ruined their sound hole humidifier because they used tap water (the manufacturer recommends distilled. Oh, the horror!), and how to "properly" launder the cloths you use to wipe down your guitars and debating callous development of nylon strings vs steel strings! I bet those guys are super fun at parties!
  20. I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you here about 80/20's and PB's being similar. I really don't think they sound anything alike. Obviously they are going to sound different on each guitar, and we all probably hear things differently to some extent. PB's on my J45 sound a little muddy and cluttered, full bass, but sounds muddy and not very defined. 80/20's on the same guitar have much better clarity, articulation and note separation. The bass is still big and growly, but it's more defined with 80/20's. I've also experienced this same difference on my Advanced Jumbo, where it seems like 80/20's were made for that guitar. Consequently, 80/20's sound dull and lifeless on my Martin guitars, both rosewood and mahogany and PB's give a lusher, fuller sound, while 80/20's sound dull and choked on the martins. The only guitars I've ever liked Retros were on an all-mahogany Martin 000-15 and a Waterloo WL-14XTR. I've tried them on every other guitar mentioned above as well, they just seemed to suck some of the life out of the sound on other guitars. Less bass, duller and overall loss of volume,e as well (which is a bad thing if it's the sound you're after).
  21. Just an update...this guitar is pretty amazing. It's light as a feather after swapping out the Rotomatics and getting rid of the UST with the internal 9v battery. It has sustain for days and rings like a bell, and has become a very responsive guitar. It's fuller, clearer and way more resonant and has much more complexity to its overall sound. The one thing ai've always been unhappy with when it came to J45 Standards were how they sounded "wet" or a little dull or dampened. I also always felt like there was something weird going on with the B & E strings on J45 Standards that just didn't sound right, like they were balanced correctly with the other strings/the tone was just off in a way I can't describe, but am not hearing any of that after the changes. I really can't attribute the improvement in sound to any one particular change that was made, but I'm guessing it's a combination of the sum of it's parts and maybe it's a culmination of all the things that were done, some being more influential than others. I feel like I've come full circle in a away. My first "nice" acoustic was a J45 Standard several years ago, and in that time I've acquired a few other Gibsons and Martins that have come and gone, and now this J45 is my favorite. I still love my AJ (use it mostly for fiddle tunes and neither of my Martin dreads can touch it), and also have a little 00-18 12-fretter that's perfect for fingerpicking, but this particular J45 is really all I want to play at the moment.
  22. Only one way to find out, and it's a pretty cheap and easy experiment. I personally would never buy strings off of eBay. Strings cost a couple bucks. Even coated strings aren't worth buying off of eBay. You'll save maybe a couple dollars, and as others have mentioned, you have no idea of their authenticity. I personally just use D-Addario EJ's. I use 80/20's on my Gibsons (EJ11's on the J45, EJ12's on the AJ) and PB's on my Martins (EJ17's on the D-28 and D-35, EJ16's on the 00-18).
  23. Dare I say, the same time put into the guitar to distress the finish could be spent playing the guitar, and in that time I'm sure you could acquire some scratches and whatnot. I have a 2017 J45 that has a TON of swirls and some small dents and dings. It's been played. In the right light you can see a LOT of those light surface scratches and swirls that accumulate from playing and handling, and it's those, that over time build up and dull the finish when the guitar is played in naturally. Not knocking someone who wants to speed up or alter the look themselves by any means since it's their guitar to do to it what they choose, but with a guitar with a darker finish (as opposed to a natural finish) like. J45, the wear and tear, scratches and dulling of the finish tends to show up and accumulate a little quicker.
  24. Double pickguards don't seem to bother Jeff Tweedy with his two J200's...
  • Create New...