Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums


All Access
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by byrds1965

  1. http://www.epiphone.com/Products/Archtop/Casino.aspx Seeing if anyone knows about or has played one of the new spec Casinos yet? Hope a moderator can answer if any Casino from 2018 with the Pau Ferro fret board will also have the new P90 "Dogear P90" = the lower wind vintage correct vs the past overwound ones. Also will there be new PU stickers to help identify these new Casinos vs the old stock ones? Will probably wait for one of the new Turquois to make sure getting the newer low wind P90s. Thanks in advance.
  2. Duncan did a complete rebuild of the pickup, wire, magnets etc. It was still a stacked single or humbucker but major improvement. It has been years ago now and I no longer have the guitar. The pickup once pulled is more along the lines of a Fender single in shape and size vs a P90. With the rebuild it sounded closer to my modern, solid top X bracing, Gibson J160E plugged in but not like my 62 spec ladder braced one. Both Gibsons had the P90s. My solid top did not have the P100. I would guess the Duncan custom shop would still do the rewind for customers. At the time I let them know try to make it as close in tone to a P90 as possible. I remember they did question what guitar it came out of and when I explained they told me, which I knew once removed, that it did not resemble a P90 at all or a P100 = a stacked P90. Other that having the thing rewound, it is an odd duck pickup and do not know anything else that would fit in the same spot. As stated above a P90 will not fit and this pickup is not P90 shaped or sized.
  3. I had a 2005 EJ160E and never liked the stock pickup. You are right it is an oddball. Despite what Epiphone claims in the specs it is NOT a P100,a Gibson P100 is 2 stacked P90s. Anyway I had mine yanked and rewound by Duncan. They did the work around 10 years ago for me so you might contact them. My direction was to try to make it as close to a P90 as possible. Once you remove the pickup to ship to them for rebuilding you will find, it more resembles a Fender single than a P90 of any kind. Duncan did a good job on mine and I think just under $100.00 plus shipping. The stock pick up can be rebuilt, so hope this helps.
  4. Agree with all of this. I bought the 2009 IB from MF for a very reduced price and was really surprised at what I ended up with. Just the luck of the draw. My friend was looking for a good acoustic at the time and we spent some time the next couple of years playing all the IB Texans we could find at GC and Sam Ash trying to find one as good as mine, since I paid under $300 USD for the first one. Never found one that sounded as good as my 2009, so he ending up buying a Gibson Songwriter instead. We both played several of those as Gibson around 2010-2011 was all over the place on assembling the Deluxe Songwriter models, some had the mustache bridge and some just the reverse belly, some had all the bling and binding and some others did not. Gibson themselves were all over the map just slapping that model together, some had the smaller pickguard some the large. He found a good one after much searching and dropping that kind of money on a Gibson/Martin is something I would never do without playing a pile of them first. For the cost of the IB Texan had no problem with the on line order and getting the luck of the draw for the kind of price I paid.
  5. I have never owned a 60s or Elitist Texan as you have owned examples, and proves that guitars of the same model vary greatly from example to example. I have noticed on the whole that the made in Indonesian IB Texan models from every one I have played at GC every time I see them and grab them off he wall seem very consistent from one to the other both in sound and fit/finish. I have never found one in the same tone range of my 2009 and did not expect to. Since I travel for work and wanted a decent hotel room guitar, bought the 2016 from MF when I found a reduced price level 2 as I figured it would be consistent to all the others I have played. It is what I expected and like it for what it is. If I ever do get a job again where I no longer travel for work the 2016 will be the one to go.
  6. Right the first IB Texans were MIC then production shifted to Indonesia. My 2009 is MIC my 2016 in MII. Both are of equal quality, but the later ones on my examples are different in width of the neck heels, headstock beveling is slightly different and position they glued the bridge on. The MIC is mounted back a bit so the saddle route is forward and the MII is forward a bit so the saddle route is in the center of the bridge. This is more in line with the 60s Gibson's where the route was right in the center of the bridge so there was plenty of room for the adjustable bridge hardware.
  7. Interesting I have the same guitars as you a 2009 IB Natural Texan then a 2016 IB Burst Texan. The top on the 2009 has a very tight grain pattern while the 2016 rather wide spaced typical of any other I have seen. I always grab them at GC off the wall and pretty much put them right back after a few strums. I will have to look at the inside bracing when home next to see if mine have any differences. My 2009 has a wider neck heel and the bridge is mounted a bit back so the saddle slot cut more forward towards the neck. My 2016 as you say has the painted black bridge with the bridge mounted a bit more forward so the saddle ends up routed in the middle. I find the black painted bridge to look cheaper. The Indonesian 2016 has more of the correct shape Gibson neck heel to it. If the internal bracing changes you state, to me then on my 2 examples not for the better tone wise. Both guitars are well constructed, tone wise miles apart. I own Gibson's and the 2009 MIC Texan sounds very much in the same tone range of my 64 J45. The same no, but in the Gibson camp midrange acoustic tone yes. This guitar is voiced very Gibson family like. My 2016 MII Texan sounds like.........well what it is an import acoustic......kind of sharp sounding, voiced more in the Taylor type range nothing Gibson tone wise about it at all. It sounds like most other solid top import acoustics. I have played many of the IB Texans since they came out and every one I have played sounds in the tone range of my 2016. I travel for work so wanted a nice acoustic for the road and found a the 2016 as a level 2 from MF at a good price, so bought it. I actually got the 2009 back in 2010 same thing as a level 2 return someone did not want. That guitar cost me less than the burst 2016, but is the keeper of all my low end gear. The 2016 a nice road guitar and fine for what it is but compared to the 2009 not even in the same league. Just goes to show how much the wood pile varies and guitar vs guitar.
  8. I am a middle PU strat player or neck. Never thought of rewiring them just have to make a conscious effort when changing to my strats to pay attention to what my right hand is doing for a bit then all good. I am 85% a Gibson guy.........but still like my strats and use them for certain things.
  9. I still do when I go from my Gibson acoustics to the Texan or my old AJ-500 but get used to it right away. I have all the same string gauges on my acoustics 12-53s. My electrics I have to think more about when first changing as palm damping on the strat is different because of the bridge and have to move my hand up a bit not to knock the volume knob and turn myself down.
  10. I own an IB Texan and am still happy with that. If I was in the market for this price range acoustic again and the new MB was available at the time I had bought my Texan would pay the extra $ for the MB over the Texan. More lively and can feel the body and the wood vibrate like a solid wood acoustic should. Plus the same feel or tension as my Gibsons.
  11. You get used to it right away when you play. Like going between my Strats and Gibsons it is there and they feel different. One is not better than the other. The string tension for the same gauge strings on both will be less on a shorter scale just the laws of physics.
  12. The AJ-45-MEs are finally at the Sam Ash and GC by me and played them at both. They are much shallower than a real Gibson J-XX by at least 1/4" or more, and still have the wrong shape to the bottom lower bout still kind of rounded like the old AJ-500s instead of flat across the bottom like a real J-45. Still have that strange Masterbuilt side/rim bracing from the bottom to the top like nothing I have ever seen in any Gibson I own, have owned or ever played. ( I think I might have seen that top bottom bracing in the old Gibson/Garrison acoustic line?) They are voiced nothing like a real J-45 and to me this model sounds voiced more in the Taylor tone range. Not a bad guitar but nothing to be billed or labeled with the J-45 name = apples and oranges. Oh well figured they would not really put out a J-45 for this price..........that would be the role Gibson has for the J-35 (affordable acoustic line that or the J-15 in walnut) Being at GC I was able to play multiple guitars right after the Epiphone AJ-45 so grabbed a real Gibson J-45, J-35, and grabbed some Taylors also. I also grabbed an IB Texan and the Masterbuilt has it over that one in pure acoustic guitar tone in it being all solid wood though IMO the Texan is voiced more along the lines of a Gibson with the strong Midrange honk and not the shiny high and low end thing. So a nice guitar for the money and I'm sure the finish most here say they don't like can be buffed to a nice shine as I had done on my AJ-500-ME burst that came out well. Anyway just my opinion/review for those who do not live in or near big cities and don't have a place to compare the named guitars one after another in the same place and have to rely on on-line ordering unseen or played. Again a nice guitar for what it is and a good value, but do not expect in any way for it to sound like or resemble in construction the Gibson J-45 it is named after. If you are in the market for a nice guitar and don't care about the Gibson voicing and trying to decide between the Texan or new MB I think it is worth the added $ over the Texan in pure acoustic guitar tone. Plus it is the correct Gibson scale and feels it over the Texan = not as stiff and lower string tension.
  13. I had my guitar tech do it for me when I had the guitar in for it's many problems. He used a drill with a buffing wheel........did not take off the pickguard. Looks wise turned out very well.
  14. I own an AJ500ME in the vintage burst and it came as the matte back then. Use some compound and buff it out and it looks just like a Gibson. This guitar I am sure you could do the same.
  15. Some have no problems the AJ500s seem prone to cracking, bridge-top lifting etc.....to get a good one pick one that has been around awhile so you know the thing has settled like the Texans as an acoustic electric much better.

  16. Some have no problems the AJ500s seem prone to cracking, bridge-top lifting etc.....to get a good one pick one that has been around awhile so you know the thing has settled like the Texans as an acoustic electric much better.

  17. This was discussed many times on the old forum. Epiphone LPs or anything Mahogany are not made of the same materials the Gibson's are. In the old "Ask Henry" forum he even broke it down in a posting for everyone. When you buy and Epiphone you get a good quality guitar but an Epiphone LP, SG etc will never be made of the same materials as the Gibson counterpart. The Hollow bodies being laminated Maple construction will be the guitars closest construction and materials to their Gibson cousins. My Gibson LP vs my Epiphone LP both with 57s from the factory, the Gibson just has more "sing" to it. Brush the strings and it resonates. I can't say if it is the Poly vs Nitro and my Epiphone LP is a great Epiphone and very pleased for what I paid for it. My Gibson LP, however, is not only a great Gibson but a great guitar period.
  18. Red = hot Blacks both = ground Green/White = split coil If wiring/installing to a non split coil guitar solder the White and Green together and leave to the side(connect to nothing). The classic pros I find ok at best. The Probuckers like the best of all current Epiphone PUs and wiring scheme the same for both.
  19. Epiphone began building their own guitars in their own Chinese factories in the mid 2000's, but the slopes still remained bean-shaped. In the past couple of years, Epiphone has been making slope-shoulder bodies that seem much closer in overall shape and dimension to Gibson's. I believe this started with the Inspired by Texan and the gloss-top AJ500M. Those are the first two models I noticed the change in, at any rate. Someone else on the forum also has a J-160E that looks close, too. But these are the exception, rather than the rule (at least they were for many years). Red 333 The Samick made EJ160E (mine was a 2006) is very close to a real J160E minus the neck scale. The IB Texans are wrong and use the same body as the old Peerless EJ160E's the bean shape as you call them. I just sold my Samick EJ160E or I could give you side by side photos of my J160E and back to back, sorry. All the Masterbuilt AJ500s are wrong too. The one I own and all the ones I have seen are way off my J45 or J160E. I posted before but the Peerless AJ45S (late 90s) was almost spot on to a real J45 minus the headstock. I don't think Gibson will let them get that close again in that price range. Everything is on CAD programs these days so they could be identical but are not, so it is what it is for a reason. You buy an Epiphone because you like it period. You go in knowing you are not getting a low cost version of a Gibson like in the old electric/acoustic Elitist line.
  20. This guitar started all the problems: My friend also has an ES339 in Cherry from the first run, seems Cherry was the first color to show up in the states. His has Probuckers. Epiphone then changed specs to Alnico Classic Pro PU and dropped the price $100 and renamed the guitar ES339-Pro. The only way to know is on a string change unscrew and look at the bottom of the PUs. The PUs are the only difference. To me a significant one as I do not think much of the Alnico Classic Pro. If you like the guitar and want to know though the only way to tell is check the PUs other wise just play and enjoy.
  21. You don't want it trust me.

    New the top humped up, then the back cracked in 2 spots, I had the cracks sealed and buffed out and the repair guys cat decided to mark the case while in storage and it has a cloud in the finish, plus it buzzes from a loose brace or bridge plate.

    My room is humidified so no excuse poor materials

    I can send you photos you have to s...

  22. Worth taking a look at if they ever bring it out. Agree too Epiphone will probably make it the wrong scale at 25.5 not a J45 at all. I still think the Masterbuilts are voiced nothing like Gibsons and are more in the Martin tone range. Looks a lot like my AJ500 ME in burst. The pickguard on mine is nothing impressive either. I posted mine was never a very impressive guitar from day one and had many issues and still has a random buzzing from a loose bridge plate or brace when you hit certain notes. I bought mine for the burst and only hang onto it as it has zero resale value and would not pawn it off on anyone else. Pretty much stays unplayed or gets left at our practice space.
  23. Sorry no pic of both. The necks felt the same a shallow fat/wide D shape to them. I think my Cherry Burst was a 2010 or 2011? My wine red one is a 2012. My dealer had the 1960 Cherry Burst in the back room new in box never opened or on the floor. He cut me a good deal as it was from the first run and the dealer knew and had ordered and had on the floor the "Plus" with the flame tops, so could not move the plain tops he had ordered as the new ones with the flame looked "better" no wine red though so took the great deal on the unopened Cherry Burst. Then after buying the Cherry Burst found a wine red listed as a return on one of the major onlines and took a chance and ordered as figured if problems would just box up and return. The wine red showed up in mint condition and do not know why was listed as used. So had both at the same time and for awhile the Cherry Burst got left at our practice space but then realized I was keeping the wine red at home and getting no use so sold the Cherry Burst and the wine red to practice and my Gibson gold top stays home. Nice guitar both of them. Both necks felt the same regardless of the specs...........so. I actually kind of wish I had held onto the Cherry Burst as I did like that finish in a plain top rather than the flame they offer it in now. The wine red however looks best to me with the flames.
  24. The first run of the Tribute1960s had a plain top = no flame veneer. I bought one of the first run in faded cherry I can say for a fact identical to the "Plus" model. I bought a wine red Plus Top and had both guitars at the same time. I sold the Faded Cherry Burst off as I wanted red in the first place and when the Plus Tops came out with that color option bought one. Same identical guitars minus the flame top. 57s, malloy caps, push pull pots, locking tuners.............identical.
  25. I think it is safe to say that despite artists and bands that pushed the boudaries in music as a whole musicians are a pretty conservative bunch. Sorry man I want my guitar made of real wood of some sort.
  • Create New...