Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

bkharmony

Members
  • Content Count

    805
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About bkharmony

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. I know there's nothing I can do to help you, but I sincerely wish I could. This world is hard to understand, let alone accept. For whatever it's worth, I'm thinking of you, and... well, I'm thinking of you.
  2. Not true. I showed what I thought was respect for others here and didn't bore them with entry-level stuff. I looked around lots of places to find my answers, and I lurked here til most of them were answered. The ones I couldn't figure out, well after I while I finally asked. Granted, I'd been playing for 8 years or so before I joined here, but for example, I never knew that a saddle could affect your tone. But an amazing thing happens when you sit back and read/listen. You learn stuff. Knowledge finds you. There was never any reason for me to ask - all I had to do was read what a lot of you al
  3. I'm not suggesting an end to asking questions. That's the whole point of a forum, and I'm perfectly aware of that. I'm just saying it makes no sense to answer the same basic questions over and over again. There's a better way to handle that, get new members up to speed, and discuss better things than which kind of strings work for a Songwriter (answer is always the same: whichever ones you like best!). I believe the way this forum has skewed toward inexperienced players and tangential ephemera drives away the very people I want to hear from. This place is pretty funny. All you have to do
  4. I guess the reason I've lost interest in the Gibson Acoustic forum (not that anyone has asked or particularly cares) is it's become something of a regular stream of the same questions over and over, from "what is my XXX worth?" to "what kind of strings should I use?", etc. This is great for Gibson, as I see a lot of first-timers here, but frankly, it's not very engaging for someone who's been here more than a few months. In my opinion, it's become a place for Gibson newbies to ask questions. Again - great for GIbson and great from newbies, not great for others. And I think that's reflected in
  5. Agreed. I wish all that stuff was posted elsewhere. For that matter - and I can't believe I'm about to type this - I wish there were tighter moderation here. It's just kind of a free-for-all, and I don't care for the way this board has evolved.
  6. I can't believe I'm the first one to mention Taylor. I need to spend more time with better Guilds. I wish there was a dealer near me. I'll never understand the allure of Martins. They just don't do anything for me.
  7. You should certainly keep experimenting with strings, but IMHO, they are one of the least important factors affecting tone. I'd suggest looking at different types of picks (assuming you're a flatpicker/strummer). You might be surprised.
  8. Well, I was trying not to be a jerk and point it out, but since you asked - some parts of this question sounded like a joke. I thought I was being a decent guy and assuming good intent by answering a question that had been overlooked to that point. I know others disagree with me here, but when your knowledge is at an early level (as the OP stated), I think it's a good idea to spend a little time (a little, I'm not talking about hours) doing some research on the internet before asking really broad, general questions on this or any other forum. It saves everyone's time and it also equip
  9. Just someone looking for attention by hopping on the bandwagon of whatever is the most recent technology. Same thing happened in the 80s when synths became ubiquitous, and the 90s when sampling became easy. Always someone looking for attention. It's easier to do something like this than learn to play well.
  10. JJ, I'm going to assume your post is in good faith. I would start with trading the plastic saddle for a Colosi bone saddle (Google it). As far as tuners go, I wouldn't be held to anything "period specific." Just get the best tuners you can (Waverlies, Gotohs, etc.). As far as "tulip button" and "double ring," I'm again going to assume your intent is genuine, and respectfully suggest you spend ten minutes with Google.com.
  11. Yes, and yes. There are (as with any thing in life and gear) many variables, but the general rule is, the more boxes, the less natural tone. Some pedals are better than others, and the order can make a huge difference, as well as the quality of patch cables (cable quality becomes a bigger deal when you have 8 of them in line). You will definitely lose some tone, but it may be barely perceivable. You'll have to determine for yourself if the tradeoff is worth it.
  12. This kind of thing can be hard to pull off, but the rewards are huge if done well. One of our local solo acoustic singer/guitarists does a great version of "Bad Romance," by Lady GaGa. I'd never heard the original, but I was really enjoying the song. I asked a friend what it was and they looked at me like I was from Mars for not knowing.
  13. I'm of two minds on this. One, I think it's a strong setlist that folks of a certain demographic will enjoy. As far as the order, I would stick with an artist for a couple songs then go to another. For example, two Beatles, two Elvis, two Dylan, back to two Beatles - rather than go all over the map. I think it gives people a chance to settle into a style/artist. But also try to avoid doing back-to-back-to-back songs in the same key. Two in a row is OK, but try to avoid three or more. My second mind tends to agree with Zombywolf in that this is a very familiar setlist that isn't very chall
×
×
  • Create New...