Victory Pete Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 I see these for sale all over the net but I don't see it listed on Gibson's website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j45nick Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Gibson's website is never complete. In any case, I think the new ES 335-12 is produced in fairly low numbers, although not strictly speaking a limited edition. The nice thing about the new ES 335-12 is that it has a wider nut than the originals, which had the narrow 1 9/16" nut of the late 1960's. Despite that, the originals are still really nice guitars. Here's my 1968 ES 335-12. It's in near-pristine condition, except for one binding ding on the back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Pete Posted January 7, 2014 Author Share Posted January 7, 2014 That is a beauty. I have the LP 12 sting now, it has a 1.75" nut, my other LP's have 1 11/16" nuts. Were all Gibsons narrow like yours back then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie brown Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Gibson's website is never complete. In any case, I think the new ES 335-12 is produced in fairly low numbers, although not strictly speaking a limited edition. The nice thing about the new ES 335-12 is that it has a wider nut than the originals, which had the narrow 1 9/16" nut of the late 1960's. Despite that, the originals are still really nice guitars. Here's my 1968 ES 335-12. It's in near-pristine condition, except for one binding ding on the back. I had one, of the same year, in "cherry!" It was a really great guitar! But, I sold it, for something else...damned if I can remember "what," now. LOL CB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j45nick Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 That is a beauty. I have the LP 12 sting now, it has a 1.75" nut, my other LP's have 1 11/16" nuts. Were all Gibsons narrow like yours back then? Most were narrow, but not all. Certainly ES 335 models (6 and 12-string) from about 1965 on had the narrow nut. Not sure when they switched back to 1 11/16, but it may not have been until the dot re-issue, which I believe was 1981. Pretty sure it went to the current (and previous) 1 11/16" in 1981. A lot of Gibson acoustics in the same period had the 1 9/16" nut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Pete Posted January 8, 2014 Author Share Posted January 8, 2014 Most were narrow, but not all. Certainly ES 335 models (6 and 12-string) from about 1965 on had the narrow nut. Not sure when they switched back to 1 11/16, but it may not have been until the dot re-issue, which I believe was 1981. Pretty sure it went to the current (and previous) 1 11/16" in 1981. A lot of Gibson acoustics in the same period had the 1 9/16" nut. Thanks for the info, I would like to try out one of those old necks just to see how narrow they really were. I had a RIC 360/12 4 years ago and it had a very narrow neck, seemed too narrow to me, I don't know why they would make them so narrow, especially on a 12 string. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j45nick Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Thanks for the info, I would like to try out one of those old necks just to see how narrow they really were. I had a RIC 360/12 4 years ago and it had a very narrow neck, seemed too narrow to me, I don't know why they would make them so narrow, especially on a 12 string. Ironically, Gibson 12-string acoustics at that time had very wide nuts--something over 1 3/4", I believe--although most of the six-string acoustics were 1 9/16". Playability depends as much on the neck shape and neck depth as it does the nut width, in my experience. If you play mostly first-position chords, you will notice the narrow nut. Higher up the board, it is barely noticeable, as the pin spacing did not get narrower on the narrow-nut guitars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.