mike tango Posted May 2, 2014 Posted May 2, 2014 Wow, a new archtop from gibson. Thought I'd start the new thread. Not sure if I like the double cut or not. Thoughts................ http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Electric-Guitars/Archtop/Gibson-Custom/L-5-Doublecut.aspx OK, I love it, I want one.
mike tango Posted May 2, 2014 Author Posted May 2, 2014 Sorry, I didnt get to namm to view the prototype. I was just observing what was posted on the gibson site and what is showing up on the retail sites.
Danny W. Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 Sorry, I didnt get to namm to view the prototype. I was just observing what was posted on the gibson site and what is showing up on the retail sites. The link I posted is another thread in this forum, where the doublecut L-5 has been discussed. Danny W.
slimt Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 is Heritage still in Business? 11.000 ??? for a double cut solid top 355.. Lots of used Single Cuts out there alot cheaper..
SteveFord Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 The price is a bit daunting. Perhaps they don't want to make too many of them?
jimmyl51 Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 Does anybody here believe that this guitar will be a big seller for Gibson? Personally I don't think that it will...........jim in Maine currently working in Denver,Colorado
floatingpickup Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 1399115610[/url]' post='1516055']Does anybody here believe that this guitar will be a big seller for Gibson? Personally I don't think that it will...........jim in Maine currently working in Denver,Colorado I am not sure of the depth of this guitar. Maybe it will sell in a thinline version like a Byrdland, but I don't think it would be successful in a full depth version. The full depth, single cut is a classic design that has been embraced by players since 1939 and has inspired many other guitar makers. Double cuts look great on guitars like 335's, but jazz players are generally traditional folks. I believe that's why the Barney Kessel was not a huge success in its day. Keith
Jayyj Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 It's a weird one - if it were a laminate guitar I could see it doing quite well as a cool oddball guitar aimed at the Gretsch / Duesenberg market, but at $10k I would guess turning heads at NAMM was the main intention - a 'look what we can do' piece rather than a serious stab at a new model - and they'll sell not more than a few dozen to wealthy collectors. It's a shame really, I very much like it as a design.
jimmyl51 Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 I for one really don't get what Gibson's point is in bringing out these oddball instruments that will most likely only appeal to collectors.......it just seems to me that Gibson is producing quite a few instruments that will never appeal nor sell to the general public which traditionally formed the basis of Gibson's market............jim in Maine now working in Denver,Colorado
Danny W. Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 I am not sure of the depth of this guitar. Maybe it will sell in a thinline version like a Byrdland, but I don't think it would be successful in a full depth version. The full depth, single cut is a classic design that has been embraced by players since 1939 and has inspired many other guitar makers. Double cuts look great on guitars like 335's, but jazz players are generally traditional folks. I believe that's why the Barney Kessel was not a huge success in its day. Keith The prototype was a thinline, so it's likely the production models will be too. As for the Kessel, it outsold the Tal and the Smith during its production period, so I'm not sure the double cut was a detriment. It's a weird one - if it were a laminate guitar I could see it doing quite well as a cool oddball guitar aimed at the Gretsch / Duesenberg market, but at $10k I would guess turning heads at NAMM was the main intention - a 'look what we can do' piece rather than a serious stab at a new model - and they'll sell not more than a few dozen to wealthy collectors. It's a shame really, I very much like it as a design. A "few dozen" carved-top guitars is a nice production run for Gibson. As for the price, it's the same as the L-5CT and a grand more than a standard L-5CES, so it's hardly out of line--if it's only for collectors, the same is true for the entire carved-top line, since none of them is cheap. I for one really don't get what Gibson's point is in bringing out these oddball instruments that will most likely only appeal to collectors.......it just seems to me that Gibson is producing quite a few instruments that will never appeal nor sell to the general public which traditionally formed the basis of Gibson's market............jim in Maine now working in Denver,Colorado Gibson has gotten requests for custom double cuts over the years and has built some in the past, so it's really not that oddball a product. Keep in mind that the Flying V, Firebird, and Explorer were considered oddball when they were first released. I would bet that quite a few players would like this guitar if the price were lower, but the main thing to keep in mind is that all carved-top production is relatively low volume, so making up a batch of something different doesn't really impact Gibson's product line very much. Instead of complaining about this guitar, we should be glad that Gibson is willing to try new things while still making more traditional models. When Gibson came out with the L-5 Signature guitars, there were many people wondering why they were making a shrunken version of a flagship guitar, including me. I'm sure glad they did, since I can now gig with a guitar that fits me much better but still looks, feels, and sounds like an L-5. I'm only sorry they haven't continued to make them, oddball or not. Danny W.
floatingpickup Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 1399162727[/url]' post='1516282']The prototype was a thinline, so it's likely the production models will be too. As for the Kessel, it outsold the Tal and the Smith during its production period, so I'm not sure the double cut was a detriment Thanks for that info Danny. I know that a very small number of Tals were made, but I wasn't aware that the Kessel actually outsold the Smith. I guess I made an incorrect assumption based on my circle of friends. I knew lots of guys who had Johnny Smiths but I didn't see many Barney Kessels around in those days. Don't get me wrong, I think the thinline double cut L5 is a good looking guitar. As you said, they don't have to make a very big batch of them to make it worthwhile. Sounds like you're thinking of ordering one! Keith
Drog Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 I kinda like this look. I am currently saving up for an L5, guess I have a new option.
Danny W. Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 Sounds like you're thinking of ordering one! Keith Not I. Have more than enough 17" guitars. Might be interested in a 16" version, though. Danny W.
JazzGtr Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 Yeah, I saw this too. Don't like the ideal and it's a terrible waste of money.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.