harryslik Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 I have a 2012 Les Paul Studio in Tv Satin Yellow It has some chambering in it.. I can not seem to get a bridge pick-up that has the same super low mid & great Thick sound that my 2014 Les Paul Standard has...(it came with Burstbucker pro's) I currently have a Burstbucker 3 in the bridge... Why is is still so thin & bright compared to my standard..??? Does the body or chambering play a large role..?? My next move is to try a Seymour Duncan Seth Lover or Slash bridge pick-up on it. Unless any of ya'll have any other ideas.
cjmwrx Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Because the BB3 isn't as hot as a BBPro. Different magnets. BB3 is A2, BBPro is A5. Have you tried raising the pickup?
harryslik Posted May 6, 2014 Author Posted May 6, 2014 This may help - Gibson Pickup Guide Lowering the pickup will give more beef and warmth. Really ? I never heard that...won't take long to try. Thnx if it works
harryslik Posted May 6, 2014 Author Posted May 6, 2014 Because the BB3 isn't as hot as a BBPro. Different magnets. BB3 is A2, BBPro is A5. Have you tried raising the pickup? That's one obvious difference..my thing is I would think the Bb3 should sound Much better.. I have tried raising.. But thank you
JazzGtr Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Sometimes we discovered a super tone in one of our guitars and wish to replicate the same tone in all of our guitars. That tone then becomes our signature tone in our heads and now that's all we know and want in every other guitar. I currently own 11 guitars and not one of them sounds like the other regardless of all of the Frankenstein experiments I have done to my other guitars chasing that tone in my head. I've changed PU, strings, picks, amps, pedal setting and cables without being able to duplicate my tone. The reasons is simple. Every guitar is different. You can take 2 1999 Custom Gibson LP made with the same materials but aged differently and you will get a different tone from both. One of my favorite Gibson guitars is my CS 356. It's the sweetest semi-hollow guitar I have ever own and played, period. And when I pick up my once owned CS 336 it was like night and day. Same dimensions, PU and strings but different tone. I eventually sold it. Maybe you should stop expecting the LP Studio to sound like your LP Standard. Jazz
harryslik Posted May 12, 2014 Author Posted May 12, 2014 Sometimes we discovered a super tone in one of our guitars and wish to replicate the same tone in all of our guitars. That tone then becomes our signature tone in our heads and now that's all we know and want in every other guitar. I currently own 11 guitars and not one of them sounds like the other regardless of all of the Frankenstein experiments I have done to my other guitars chasing that tone in my head. I've changed PU, strings, picks, amps, pedal setting and cables without being able to duplicate my tone. The reasons is simple. Every guitar is different. You can take 2 1999 Custom Gibson LP made with the same materials but aged differently and you will get a different tone from both. One of my favorite Gibson guitars is my CS 356. It's the sweetest semi-hollow guitar I have ever own and played, period. And when I pick up my once owned CS 336 it was like night and day. Same dimensions, PU and strings but different tone. I eventually sold it. Maybe you should stop expecting the LP Studio to sound like your LP Standard. Jazz You are probably Right. But until I find another Les Paul or some other guitar that makes me think I could actually do a gig and be happy with the sound...I will probably continue on a Wild Goose Chase...and in the end learn a lot along the way.. and more importantly wasting too much money on the quest. Lol thanks for the reality check.
knucklebut Posted October 29, 2014 Posted October 29, 2014 1399856114[/url]' post='1519312']You are probably Right. But until I find another Les Paul or some other guitar that makes me think I could actually do a gig and be happy with the sound...I will probably continue on a Wild Goose Chase...and in the end learn a lot along the way.. and more importantly wasting too much money on the quest. Lol thanks for the reality check. MANY of us here are on the verge of divorce cuz of the quest....
cjsinla Posted October 29, 2014 Posted October 29, 2014 I have a 2012 Les Paul Studio in Tv Satin Yellow It has some chambering in it.. I can not seem to get a bridge pick-up that has the same super low mid & great Thick sound that my 2014 Les Paul Standard has...(it came with Burstbucker pro's) I currently have a Burstbucker 3 in the bridge... Why is is still so thin & bright compared to my standard..??? Does the body or chambering play a large role..?? My next move is to try a Seymour Duncan Seth Lover or Slash bridge pick-up on it. Unless any of ya'll have any other ideas. Try one of the solid LP Trads and see if solid vs clambering makes a difference.
masliko Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 OK. Hi Harry, I experienced that exact same thing with a now gone 2012 LP Studio in Ebony/Chrome. Some may say things that, though true, are not overly relevent to THIS PARTICULAR MODEL. Here's the problems - IMO: 1. Modern Weight Relief applied to the thinner body of a Studio. 2. Granadillo is a good sub for Rosewood (but it has a tighter grain/brightness to it, sorta like Ebony). --- Those tiny medium frets don't help matters either. 3. Pickups - Get a DiMarzio Tone Zone bridge DP155. Today. Apologies if I sound pushy or anything, but I myself lived thru this nightmare with this model and spent a lot of time and money trying to get rid of that brightness...and mine came stock with the 498T!!!!!!!!!!! The lower output PAF variations will not satisfy you (again - my opinion). I know first hand what you're going thru. Please try the Tone Zone. You can always return it, no? I never give advice so 'forcefully' but I must make an exception. Please keep me informed. Good Luck. sorry to state the obvious but they are different guitars.I have few les pauls and to my ears the 2008 chambering actually makes the LP "cut" like with surgical procession through any amount of band noise..I cannot speak of the new modern weight relief just the 07/08.It kills my 77 in that department but i love my guitars sounding different.I would take the advice above.Always take advice from those who have 'actually' experienced the same situation as you. I am 5'7 and have a small build.I stopped playing les pauls live and moved to strats because of the weight on my 73 and 78.Now i get to use a LP live again!I love Les Pauls and Strats/tele's equally, as they are different tools for different applications IMO.
lazarusvt84 Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 I have a 2012 Les Paul Studio in Tv Satin Yellow It has some chambering in it.. I can not seem to get a bridge pick-up that has the same super low mid & great Thick sound that my 2014 Les Paul Standard has...(it came with Burstbucker pro's) I currently have a Burstbucker 3 in the bridge... Why is is still so thin & bright compared to my standard..??? Does the body or chambering play a large role..?? My next move is to try a Seymour Duncan Seth Lover or Slash bridge pick-up on it. Unless any of ya'll have any other ideas. Had same issue with my first LP ...a chambered 2009 Studio with 490/498s, bright as a day is long. Sold it to get a 2010 Trad with 57 Classics...same thing to a lesser degree (it may have helped had I known better to mess with pup and/or pole heights) but a set of SD JB's helped a lot. Sounds good now. I have 490/498s on my SG Std and it howls all night. Both my son's wt relieved studio and new Trad growl like animals...great tone. One had 490's, then SDs, the other 57's. I think a lot factors contribute to the tone...pup, pup height, pup/pole heights, fingerboard material and the body wood. I'd mess with pup/pole heights first. I suspect this is why we see so many guitars trading hands....I'm guilty of it.
Aymara Posted November 2, 2014 Posted November 2, 2014 A too brite sounding LP? Well, string choice might play a role too. This summer I was lucky to get a limited Gretsch Red Falcon and because of the combination of TV Jones Jones pickups with an aluminium bridge it was brite as hell. I put on Gibson Vintage Reissue pure nuckel strings and BAM, exactly the sound I was seeking: Dry bass, creamy midrange and a bit tamed treble without loosing clarity. So before thicking about new pickups, I would recommend to try pure nickel strings first, if not already tested.
ido1957 Posted November 3, 2014 Posted November 3, 2014 I've turned down my tone on my LP to cut back on the brightness. Maybe to 7 or so.
Sgt. Posted November 4, 2014 Posted November 4, 2014 This may help - Gibson Pickup Guide Lowering the pickup will give more beef and warmth. Is there a 'Goldielocks' zone with pickups where the magenetic pull is not too much on the strings and not too far away? Agree? Disagree? I personally have BBpros and really lowered them from stock because they were sooo hot. I find the neck pu a bit dark compared to the bridge, considered a .15 cap (instead of .22) in the neck?
rdclmn7 Posted March 4, 2015 Posted March 4, 2015 Remove the bridge pickup's metal cover. It's the reason a telecaster's rhythm pickup is covered. You just might notice the change in tone.
Aymara Posted March 4, 2015 Posted March 4, 2015 Remove the bridge pickup's metal cover. Then it would sound even brighter / more harsh.
btoth76 Posted March 4, 2015 Posted March 4, 2015 Then it would sound even brighter / more harsh. Yes, if anything noticable will happen at all... I'd say: lower the pickups. And, - people - use those controls! They are there for a reason! Cheers... Bence
Mr. C.O. Jones Posted March 4, 2015 Posted March 4, 2015 Yes, if anything noticable will happen at all... I'd say: lower the pickups. And, - people - use those controls! They are there for a reason! Cheers... Bence Amen brotha! My LP has 4 knobs and a 3 way switch, my amp has 3 knobs, and you can't imagine how much tones I get out of that! PU height work's magic to.
billymagnum Posted March 4, 2015 Posted March 4, 2015 if i wanted all my guitars to sound the same, i wouldn't have so many damn guitars. still if you want more beef try some eq or boost.
tokairic Posted March 12, 2015 Posted March 12, 2015 I have a 2012 Les Paul Studio in Tv Satin Yellow It has some chambering in it.. I can not seem to get a bridge pick-up that has the same super low mid & great Thick sound that my 2014 Les Paul Standard has...(it came with Burstbucker pro's) I currently have a Burstbucker 3 in the bridge... Why is is still so thin & bright compared to my standard..??? Does the body or chambering play a large role..?? My next move is to try a Seymour Duncan Seth Lover or Slash bridge pick-up on it. Unless any of ya'll have any other ideas. I have chambered and solid Les Pauls, and I don't think the chambering plays a huge part in the bridge tone alone. I have a 24 fret Custom Les Paul which is very bright on the bridge p/up with its 498T pickup fitted because the bridge is closer to the bridge pickup than the 22 fret Les Pauls. I recently changed the bridge p/u for another brand (v. expensive) and it was so bright I took the p/up straight out. The answer for me is to fit a high output p/up (above 14k) and lower the pickup to balance the volume with the neck p/up. This gives a slightly warmer sound to the bridge. Changing to pure nickel strings may also help.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.