JuanCarlosVejar Posted May 12, 2014 Posted May 12, 2014 this is the weirdest thing I have seen in a while , a 64 reissue with klusons : http://davesguitar.com/products/gibson-montana/1964-sj-200-reissue/ JC
zombywoof Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 The real question is why the heck would anybody reissue a 1964 J-200 especially when you are apparently not terribly enamored with the original specs so put a 1.725" nut on it.
JuanCarlosVejar Posted May 13, 2014 Author Posted May 13, 2014 I think the bridge is great . and they would have got this one right if they would have put the metal tulips on this one and not the green plastic ones . even the custom trussrod cover is period correct. JC
zombywoof Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 Hate it. Awful. +1. I do like the burst on this one better than those found on a '64 though.
retrorod Posted May 14, 2014 Posted May 14, 2014 I think that the pickguard radius around the soundhole is "dicked up"... no excuse....NONE!
E-minor7 Posted May 14, 2014 Posted May 14, 2014 I burn to play this guitar - it makes me flaming curious. .
slimt Posted May 14, 2014 Posted May 14, 2014 I think the bridge is great . and they would have got this one right if they would have put the metal tulips on this one and not the green plastic ones . even the custom trussrod cover is period correct. JC Have you ever owned a adjustable Bridge J200? ..
JuanCarlosVejar Posted May 14, 2014 Author Posted May 14, 2014 Have you ever owned a adjustable Bridge J200? .. S, I meant as far as looks ... no I have never owned one but if I can find a lefty I would own one. I can't judge the sound JC
slimt Posted May 14, 2014 Posted May 14, 2014 S, I meant as far as looks ... no I have never owned one but if I can find a lefty I would own one. I can't judge the sound JC These were built like tanks.. and sounded aweful.. then the double x brace came along.. they did get worse..
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.