Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums
Sign in to follow this  
MarlleyB

how do richlite fingerboards sound?

Recommended Posts

Tone, I honestly don't know how much you can say fret board material matters (compared to a pick up or something) but there is a considerable difference in feel to my fat little fingers. Ebony offers more resistance than the synthetic materials.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how do they compare to say, ebony in tone?

 

Heck if I know. Ebony is desirable because of its hardness. Synthetic ebony is harder than ebony, looks like ebony... I don't notice a big difference in tone or feel, even compared to rosewood (but I'm no real connoisseur). But I like it! I guess ebony is becoming pretty scarce - and regulated - so richlite is environmentally considerate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have richlite on one of my Martin acoustic guitars that I bought in 2010, and I love it! It's very dense and smooth, and string bends are a breeze! Tone-wise, good luck trying to attribute any difference to tone, especially with an electric guitar. If there's going to be any problems with tone it would be more readily noticeable on an acoustic guitar, and I sure don't hear any. It's a great fret board material.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just my opinion. Yours may differ and I respect it.

 

I wish Gibson had never discovered Richlite or back of the headstock auto-tuners no matter what they call them.

 

Gibson's better than this. Profit margin be damned. Richlite will never be as good as real Rosewood or Ebony and guitarists willing to invest their hard earned cash in a high quality Gibson guitar can surely tune their own freakin' axe.

 

What is this world coming to?[rolleyes]O:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richlite is a synthetic substitute for ebony, which Gibson used on high end guitars. The problem is that Richlite is a low end fretboard material, so it's kind of out of place on Custom level guitars. It's just fake wood.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for the current Gibsons in the family, I have Richlite on my Midtown Custom, Ebony on my Martin acoustic and my son's Flying V, and Rosewood on my Les Paul Traditional Pro II and my son's ES339. As far as tone difference, I don't think there is any. As far as playability and maintenance and looks, the Richlite is the best hands down. Ebony is a close second. Have had dozens of others and played hundreds of others and this is just what we both think.

 

I agree that I hate most of what Gibson has done in the way of feature changes since 2014. I can live with Richlite. Easily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richlite is a synthetic substitute for ebony, which Gibson used on high end guitars. The problem is that Richlite is a low end fretboard material, so it's kind of out of place on Custom level guitars. It's just fake wood.

I agree with you on this too. Still would perfer Ebony on a classic like a Les Paul Custom or similar high end model.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wish Gibson had never discovered Richlite or back of the headstock auto-tuners no matter what they call them.

 

Totally agree on the auto-tuners. Disagree on the richlite. But I agree with FZ Fan -- I'd want ebony on a $3,000 guitar, even though richlite is a really good substitute.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I own a Gibson Custom Shop CS-336 F Wildwood Spec. I bought "new" for $3300.00 . I love everything about it and would have, in hindsight, considered passing it up a huge mistake. I am so so happy with this axe! It has a rosewood board. Had the write up on the Wildwood site listed Richlite as the fretboard material I'd have gone looking elsewhere. In this price range I want real wood. It's not so much whether it works or is easy to use. It's more about expecting to get exactly what you want when making a high dollar purchase.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We all have our preferences. I am not fond of rosewood for fretboards.

I personally wouldnt pay more than £1000 (about $1500) for a guitar with a rosewood fingerboard.

 

I carefully choose my 2015 gibson for its torrified maple fingerboard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an ES-355 (2014) with Richlite. It is the best sounding (and best looking) guitar I own when compared to my two LPs with rosewood boards. It is my opinion that nut material will affect tone more than fingerboard material. Hence, my -355 is currently in the shop for neck repair and I'm having a bone nut installed. I'm curious what the Ebony aficionados on this board have for nut material on their axes? Plastic?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meant to say doesn't the nut only affect your tone on 6 notes open E,A,D,G,B, and and high e.

 

That makes sense, but... I recently installed a bone nut on one of my LPs and the tones coming out of her are phenomenally better than with the Tusq nut I replaced. Not just the open notes, everything. Maybe its just me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have Richlite on one of my Martin's and I haven't noticed any big difference. Time will tell.

 

Wear-wise I like ebony and the way it holds up but I have had it crack on one of my Gretschs.

 

Looks wise I like my maple fret boards.

 

Feel-wise, playing wise I prefer rosewood and have worn out a few boards.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when i read all the negative comments about Richlite from neither luthiers neither pro

it's something like hilarious : it's like when i asked a question to a specialist

he told me that it was not because you read mahogany or alder that you could imagine how it would sound

so, it's the same here

it's like saying : "only locking tuners are the best" when some worldwide famous guitarists never used and never needed them, so ?

 

so, i just read that and i believe Gibson more :)

http://www.gibson.com/News-Lifestyle/Gear-Tech/en-us/Building-a-Better-Fingerboard.aspx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently bought a high end Custom Shop 356 that came with a Richlite fingerboard. If I didn't know that it was Richlite, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between it and Ebony, in it's tone or feel. After all, the strings are touching either the nut or the frets, not the actual fingerboard.

 

Being a synthetic it should have advantages of being consistent, not warping, and not shrinking so should never have fret sprout problems either. I've only had it for about 5 months, but so far everything is fine and the guitar sounds great.

 

RKnKRPk.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an ES-355 (2014) with Richlite. It is the best sounding (and best looking) guitar I own when compared to my two LPs with rosewood boards. It is my opinion that nut material will affect tone more than fingerboard material. Hence, my -355 is currently in the shop for neck repair and I'm having a bone nut installed. I'm curious what the Ebony aficionados on this board have for nut material on their axes? Plastic?

 

 

Can't speak for others but on my Les Paul 25 / 50 (ebony board) the nut is brass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 2015 LPC with Richlite, and there are no issues whatsoever with it. It looks good, has no effect on the sound as far as I can tell... It didn't deter me from buying a LPC with it on the fretboard...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...