Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums
Sign in to follow this  
sookwinder

Keith's 60s Hummingbird

Recommended Posts

Hello to all.

Been wondering for a while about Keith Richards' 1960s Gibson Hummingbird. The guitar was used on Street Fighting Man, Jumpin' Jack Flash and a whole myriad of classic Stones tracks.

But what year is it? Maybe a 1965. 1965 is the date on the earliest photos I can locate of the Hummingbird.

If it is a 1965 model, what is the scale length? 24.75" or 25.5"

 

Anyone here with a knowledge of this guitar ?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keith and Mick got one ceramic saddled cherry sunburst each - I think in 1965. Jones picked a J-200.

They might have been from that year or the one before. Both Birds are 24,75'ers.

1968 ~ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXivhZmNKzM

Nice job of answering! How'd you find out the scale length? I've wondered, but never came across the answer until now....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Em7 on scale length and have no reason to doubt the '65er.

My eye is calibrated to see the distance from pickguard to bridge to pretty accurately guess scale. I think Mr 7 sees something pretty similar with the parallelograms when guessing nut width.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Em7 on scale length and have no reason to doubt the '65er.

My eye is calibrated to see the distance from pickguard to bridge to pretty accurately guess scale. I think Mr 7 sees something pretty similar with the parallelograms when guessing nut width.

I am in awe of both of you - and I suspect you both shoot a far better pool game than I could ever hope for!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Em7 on scale length and have no reason to doubt the '65er.

My eye is calibrated to see the distance from pickguard to bridge to pretty accurately guess scale. I think Mr 7 sees something pretty similar with the parallelograms when guessing nut width.

Very well remembered - for yes, , , it's possible to zoom in on the 3rd fret splits to long-distance-check nuts.

 

Regarding scale it's something I sense from the tons of pics seen of those Stones-Birds on the web (btw. they had more than these two).

 

Okay, tons and tons, , , but more or less all there are then. Besides there weren't many longies out in that period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a trip reading how Richards got those sounds on record. Don't expect to go buy that same guitar and hear the same sound. He ran them through the darndest things to get unique tones. He cheated you might say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a trip reading how Richards got those sounds on record.

The paradox about the Hummingbird history and average H-bird fans is while there's consensus regarding the adjustable saddle being a bad idea -

people always mention the 60's Stones-recordings as the sonic ideal for the model. I personally like those sounds a lot too and know what they mean.

 

 

Things is that those tracks were done with ceramic saddles - and the big 1973 Bird-anthem Angie probably even with porcelain in a hollow plastic bridge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks like to b!tch about the adj saddles, but a good'n is still a good'n. The plastic bridges were a bit over the line, but if they haven't warped or broken, they'll work Ok as far as that goes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have been listening for years to the genius sound engineers, don't understand why you can't see and understand it!

I don't know who don't understand this - certainly not me. I think it obvious the big bands at the time hired the best available techs.

Btw. remember there wasn't too many, who could be labeled rock-engineer back then.

 

Now let's listen to this one - which most of you know so well.

No proof, but something tells me it could be a plastic-bridged Bird. There's a non-wooden flavor there. Yet it sounds damn good.

What d'ya think. . ?

 

1969 ~ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao9Rbr7uybQ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, tons and tons, , , but more or less all there are then. Besides there weren't many longies out in that period.

[/quote

 

I'm all ears. I have heard the same, that the longs were maple bodies meant for the other bird. I haven't any evidence of the solid variety. My pockets won't take me back that far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...