Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

JL Les Paul Jr. mod COMPLETED!!! (with demo sound clip)


duane v

Recommended Posts

Finally completed, and it plays and sounds pretty *****in.. well at least to me it does.... A huge thanks to Sammy Sanchez.... Great friend, he spent tons of time to get everything right.#-o

 

Anywhoo I did a little recording, and I recorded the lead and rhythm tracks dry (no effects whatsoever). And I plugged the guitar straight into the mixing board. The lead track is done with the neck Charlie Christian pup ( by Pete of vintagevibeguitars). And the rhythm was done with the bridge Gibson p-90 pup...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the nice words fellow Gibby heads

 

As for the cost:

$1550 for everything

 

$800 = guitar

$300 = parts

$450 = labor

 

I could have saved some additional cost on the bridge and tailpiece, but I went with a vintage 1970 featherweight aluminum tailpiece and 1971 ABR bridge which added $150 to the parts list. The CC pup ran $99.

 

Through my VOX AC50 the guitar sounds like a Tele on steroids. And after having the frets dressed and the fretboard micro-polished (or whatever the term is), it feels like glass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is truly outstanding! I so want a Lennon LP but they're crazy expensive - I believe you found a loop hole!

 

thanx

 

If you think about it, Johns LP Junior probably ran him $180 -$200, and adding the mods prbably accumulated an additional $200 tops. So in reality John's LP Junior was nothing more than a $400-$500 guitar.

 

I figure if John Lennon could be frugal with his guitars, why can't we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great job, it looks and sounds really good.

 

Gotta love Pete Biltoff's pickups. I have a set in my Tele. Wouldn't trade them for anything else I've heard, and the price was great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Through my VOX AC50 the guitar sounds like a Tele on steroids. And after having the frets dressed and the fretboard micro-polished (or whatever the term is), it feels like glass.

 

Newbie alert! I'll try to be brief!

Hello fellas . . .

Sorry, but I don't see a link that I can follow to see/hear what you've done - what am I missing? I just picked up my first Gibby, a Jr in worn white. I'm in love with just about everything so far and cant wait to wear through this finish and give her some character! But day two I'm already thinking about adding a neck pick up for warmer cleans, and am poking around to see what others have done . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry about that[blush]..... My other image account was hit with a virus and the place shut down..... I lost so many images[crying]

 

Here's the sound demo of a little lead work using the Charlie Christian neck pup

 

[YOUTUBE]

[/YOUTUBE]

 

Some pictures.

 

P3040140b.jpg?t=1273788398

 

277129.jpg?t=1273788486

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi Duane! Have you got any pics of the back? I'm trying to get this done myself right now and wondering if you have to route from the back or if it can be done from the front. Everyone I speak to says with the modern style CC pups you can route from the front but then I'm wondering how the pickup stays in the body without mounting screws? I'm looking at the Jason Lollar one which does have a mounting bit but that would obviously mess with the Lennon look.

 

large-black-cc-telecaster.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanx

 

If you think about it, Johns LP Junior probably ran him $180 -$200, and adding the mods prbably accumulated an additional $200 tops. So in reality John's LP Junior was nothing more than a $400-$500 guitar.

 

I figure if John Lennon could be frugal with his guitars, why can't we.

 

Well, The Beatles were never known to use "expensive" guitars, even as

they could have done, back in the day. They used what they liked, and

what felt/sounded good. George's Country Gent's, and Ric's were probably

the most "expensive" guitars they owned, at that time. It always amazes,

and amuses me, that your average teenage "garage" band, has far nicer,

and more expensive gear, quite often, that The Beatles had, in their heyday! [tongue]

 

And, none of them have done, or will probably ever do, anything close to

what The Beatles accomplished. But, who knows?! [biggrin]

 

CB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, The Beatles were never known to use "expensive" guitars, even as

they could have done, back in the day. They used what they liked, and

what felt/sounded good. George's Country Gent's, and Ric's were probably

the most "expensive" guitars they owned, at that time. It always amazes,

and amuses me, that your average teenage "garage" band, has far nicer,

and more expensive gear, quite often, that The Beatles had, in their heyday! [tongue]

 

And, none of them have done, or will probably ever do, anything close to

what The Beatles accomplished. But, who knows?! [biggrin]

 

CB

 

Yeah maybe but the Beatles had a lot of guitars and not all of them cheap to the day's prices.Quick tallies from 1963-69: 5 Gretsches, 8 Rickenbackers, 7 Gibsons, 4 Epiphones(USA Kalamazoo made) 7 Fenders, 1 Maton, 2 Hofners, 1 Framus, 3-4 Spanish quality spanish guitars. Nearly 40 instruments between 3 guys in 7 years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah maybe but the Beatles had a lot of guitars and not all of them cheap to the day's prices.Quick tallies from 1963-69: 5 Gretsches, 8 Rickenbackers, 7 Gibsons, 4 Epiphones(USA Kalamazoo made) 7 Fenders, 1 Maton, 2 Hofners, 1 Framus, 3-4 Spanish quality spanish guitars. Nearly 40 instruments between 3 guys in 7 years...

 

Well, I wasn't implying (or, didn't mean to) that they used "cheap junk," at all! Just that they

didn't seem preoccupied, with "only the best," when it came to their guitars. Maybe, the "Best"

for them was for what sounds/tones, they wanted. Then again, maybe they were so busy, they didn't

dwell on that subject, as much as WE tend to do, these days. Also, growing up, during tht time, I

know there were not the choices back then, cheap or expensive, that we have nowadays.

 

As to your tally, of their gear over a 6 year period...Heck, there's a lot of folks on this forum,

that would put that amount to shame [tongue][biggrin] ...IF that was really important, or any kind of "goal." So...??? :)

 

CB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I wasn't implying (or, didn't mean to) that they used "cheap junk," at all! Just that they

didn't seem preoccupied, with "only the best," when it came to their guitars. Maybe, the "Best"

for them was for what sounds/tones, they wanted. Then again, maybe they were so busy, they didn't

dwell on that subject, as much as WE tend to do, these days. Also, growing up, during tht time, I

know there were not the choices back then, cheap or expensive, that we have nowadays.

 

As to your tally, of their gear over a 6 year period...Heck, there's a lot of folks on this forum,

that would put that amount to shame [tongue][biggrin] ...IF that was really important, or any kind of "goal." So...??? :)

 

CB

 

You're totally right CB. I guess their priority was crafting songs and making them sound right as a unit. They obviously liked their toys, like I do myself, but the end product was the most important thing and 99% of the time they got it spot on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...