Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

How good is your eye- can you spot the Los Paul :p


theonlyonethat

Recommended Posts

I am not well versed in all the models, so I am probably wrong.

 

What stands out to me is the fact that it has bindings with dot inlays.

 

And the first thing I noticed was the fact that there isn't a bridge. Just a tailpiece. (Or is that a bridge with no tailpiece?) lol

 

I am going with fake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of the above can be found on real gibsons... the only thing that can prove it fake is the ______ and it can't be noticeable on such a small pic... if I were on the hunt for a used guitar (which I never am) I would ask for better pics, if the seller wont give them then I wont buy from him.

 

If you do post another pic, take one of the side of the neck... I'd like to see the neck wood... :)

 

 

By the way... I think it's a real gibson...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its actually a "Maestro by Gibson" "Single Cutaway Carvetop".

http://www.gibson.com/en-us/Divisions/Maestro/Electrics/Single%20Cutaway%20Carvetop/

 

technically' date='its not a Les Paul but its a real Gibson product.[/quote']

 

I looked, you're probably right. But it has a pickguard and the ones on the site don't. Why would someone try and add on to such a cheap guitar? By the way he's asking $50, I'm just researching it a little.

 

Before I get lectured- I have my own playing preferences, and a friend trying to start likes a les paul due to some hype. I'm just trying to make sure I know what I'm getting.

 

I got to play a robot les paul, I really wasn't impressed. It sits akwardly due to the les paul shape and I had to use a strap. It's kind of far back when over your leg.

 

I prefer guitars with a shape that sit comortably with me when playing. The tone wasn't that different either. I heard people say les pauls had infinte sustain, and were completely amazing. They seemed to be bright, but weren't something completely out there.

 

I also don't like SGs.

 

I do like xplorers, and the flying v meeting as one to form the typical dime body (they need a deeper cutaway on the lower horn!!). The only thing I like about gibsons, they have finished necks on almost everything.

 

If the xplorer had just a little deeper cutaway on the lower horn it would be perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I got to play a robot les paul' date=' I really wasn't impressed. It sits akwardly due to the les paul shape and I had to use a strap. It's kind of far back when over your leg.

 

I prefer guitars with a shape that sit comortably with me when playing. The tone wasn't that different either. I heard people say les pauls had infinte sustain, and were completely amazing. They seemed to be bright, but weren't something completely out there.

 

I also don't like SGs.

 

I do like xplorers, and the flying v meeting as one to form the typical dime body (they need a deeper cutaway on the lower horn!!).

 

The only thing I like about gibsons, they have finished necks on almost everything.

[/quote']

 

I don't get it...

 

If you don't like Gibsons (apart from the finished neck), why are you even looking at a Les Paul (Gibson/Maestro/Whatever)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I looked' date=' you're probably right. But it has a pickguard and the ones on the site don't. Why would someone try and add on to such a cheap guitar? By the way he's asking $50, I'm just researching it a little.

 

Before I get lectured- I have my own playing preferences, and a friend trying to start likes a les paul due to some hype. I'm just trying to make sure I know what I'm getting.

 

I got to play a robot les paul, I really wasn't impressed. It sits akwardly due to the les paul shape and I had to use a strap. It's kind of far back when over your leg.

 

I prefer guitars with a shape that sit comortably with me when playing. The tone wasn't that different either. I heard people say les pauls had infinte sustain, and were completely amazing. They seemed to be bright, but weren't something completely out there.

 

I also don't like SGs.

 

I do like xplorers, and the flying v meeting as one to form the typical dime body (they need a deeper cutaway on the lower horn!!). The only thing I like about gibsons, they have finished necks on almost everything.

 

If the xplorer had just a little deeper cutaway on the lower horn it would be perfect.[/quote']

 

So, your friend is going to start playing guitar, and likes LP's "due to some hype"...yet you are on here to make sure you know what you are getting? Did you also play the Robot LP for your friend as well?

 

I'm really not sure I understand the purpose of this thread.

 

+1 to what AXE said in regards to being tired of these fake LP threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty little photo.

My guess is fake.

I see no trap inlays' date='but I suppose it could be a model with dots.

It doesn't by the photo look to be an archtop,almost looks flat[/quote']

 

Yes, and always be suspect of a pic that obscures a clear view of the headstock (front and back)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is asking for 50 bucks? Then why are you loosing our time man? It's not like he is asking 3K and saying it is a reisue or a one of a kind... at 50 bucks who cares what it is? I've sent more on firewood...

 

At the price it most surely is a "maestro by gibson" that is their "learning line". I've spotted some ignorants listing them as gibsons locally... of course in the description most of them say its a maestro by gibson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got to play a robot les paul' date=' I really wasn't impressed. It sits akwardly due to the les paul shape and I had to use a strap. It's kind of far back when over your leg.

 

I prefer guitars with a shape that sit comortably with me when playing.

 

I also don't like SGs.

 

The only thing I like about gibsons, they have finished necks on almost everything.[/quote']

 

Buy a Strat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...