Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Help ... Please tell me if this nut is cut correctly


RandyB
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah - Looks bad.  Gibson isn't cutting their nuts well at all lately.  I don't know what their problem is.  They're all cut badly.  I thought they were cut by the PLEK machine, but they're always REALLY bad.  Like the low E on my new SG - string height at the first fret was about 6/64" - it' supposed to be 1 to 1-1/2 64ths.  You pretty much can't buy a Gibson unless you can finish the nut yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, badbluesplayer said:

Yeah - Looks bad.  Gibson isn't cutting their nuts well at all lately.  I don't know what their problem is.  They're all cut badly.  I thought they were cut by the PLEK machine, but they're always REALLY bad.  Like the low E on my new SG - string height at the first fret was about 6/64" - it' supposed to be 1 to 1-1/2 64ths.  You pretty much can't buy a Gibson unless you can finish the nut yourself.

Well, at least I'm not alone. She plays fine with no fret buzz or binding, so it appears to be more of a cosmetic thing than anything else. Not a big deal at this point. I'll likely change it out later, but not right now.

What have you done, if anything, about your SG?

Edited by RandyB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spoke to two luthiers yesterday and showed them photos. Both said the top of the nut could be shaved down, but they'd leave it alone if there were no buzzing, binding, or intonation issues. I can live with the minor cosmetic issue. Funny thing ... I was in the local guitar store yesterday and, while there were some better looking nuts on the LPs, none of 'em felt or played for me as good as mine. Also, those LPs had other issues such as unfinished lacquering and residue staining, even on some of the customs. So, my conclusion from all of this is that while Gibson has made some necessary and welcome strides at improvement, it appears that it still has a long way to go on the QC front ... plainly, that's not a surprise to anyone, although I had bought in initially to the idea that Gibson had progressed more than it has.

If I were to change the nut, I'd likely take it to a luthier in any event rather than the local guitar store from where I bought the guitar.

 

 

 

30 minutes ago, Twang Gang said:

 

 
 
Edited by RandyB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks a little deep as cut by the Plek. If you don't have any buzz or sitar buzz on open strings; and not binding after bends... I wouldn't worry about it. 

Well, I'm sometimes OCD and file dress the top angled more and lower the top of the nut to expose more of strings. And I don't forget to polish to shine! Well, now I would just let it be if it plays OK.. I've become less OCD and practice more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/10/2020 at 9:55 PM, RandyB said:

Yeah, I'm gonna leave it alone. Gibson said they'd replace it under warranty, but I would rather not do that on a new guitar if there are no issues. I can live with the cosmetics.

I would've done the same. You just KNOW the replacement would sound like crap. And then you'd have to send that one back, and the truck would not only skid on ice and break the guitar (which would not be under warranty due to Corona), but hit and kill a deer, and then the villagers would run you out with torches and pitchforks shouting, "you killed Bambi!". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...