JuanCarlosVejar Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 Folks , Check it out: It seems to me the reissue sounded almost exactly like the 38 (the experience might vary in person) . Great job Gibson ! JC Quote
bobouz Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 Wow - Very impressively close! Thanks for posting, JC. Quote
kelly campbell Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 Cool stuff...I often have wondered how any re-issue or historic would compare to an original. thanks Quote
zombywoof Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 Cool! And thanks. A noticeable difference between the two guitars. A late-1930s three non-scalloped tone bar J35 remains at the top of my X'mas wish list. Quote
Hall Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 Very close and nice. Thank you Juan. Wish they didn't so darn much. Quote
BoSoxBiker Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 Nice! Sounds like the differences are similar to going from one guitar to the next of the same make & model on a wall. One's got more mids while one's got thicker low end. Probably predictable, too, with the older being wide open. Same sort of sound, though. I wonder how much closer to the 1938 open sound it would be if Gibson was to make an all torrified version? Meaning more than just the top being baked. I've heard a few other makes' efforts online done that way and was very impressed. Much bigger $$.... Quote
zombywoof Posted September 7, 2020 Posted September 7, 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, PatriotsBiker said: Nice! Sounds like the differences are similar to going from one guitar to the next of the same make & model on a wall. One's got more mids while one's got thicker low end. Probably predictable, too, with the older being wide open. Same sort of sound, though. I wonder how much closer to the 1938 open sound it would be if Gibson was to make an all torrified version? Meaning more than just the top being baked. I've heard a few other makes' efforts online done that way and was very impressed. Much bigger $$.... To my ears the '38 has thicker more pronounced mids while the '36 Historic has more upper end cut. I also do not think any amount of baking is going to make much difference. A '38 J35 was structurally a very different beast than the modern take. Tom though who has spent far more time with J35s than me is the one who could do a much better job of discussing differences Edited September 7, 2020 by zombywoof Quote
Dave F Posted September 8, 2020 Posted September 8, 2020 4 hours ago, zombywoof said: To my ears the '38 has thicker more pronounced mids while the '36 Historic has more upper end cut. I also do not think any amount of baking is going to make much difference. A '38 J35 was structurally a very different beast than the modern take. Tom though who has spent far more time with J35s than me is the one who could do a much better job of discussing differences I wish I lived close enough to Tom to compare some that I've had/have. Old vs. New I've done twice. '42 J45 vs J45 Legend, the Legend won. The '42 had a rough life and was not a stellar example. '42 Hog Top LG1 vs 2013 LG2 Banner RI Mahogany, the '42 had a rough life but luckily was all original and only needed a few repairs. The '42 won. Quote
BoSoxBiker Posted September 8, 2020 Posted September 8, 2020 8 hours ago, zombywoof said: To my ears the '38 has thicker more pronounced mids while the '36 Historic has more upper end cut. I also do not think any amount of baking is going to make much difference. A '38 J35 was structurally a very different beast than the modern take. Tom though who has spent far more time with J35s than me is the one who could do a much better job of discussing differences Agreed on what you hear. I do wonder why the higher mids (the thicker bright area) did not have more to say from the 36 Historic. Quote
tpbiii Posted September 8, 2020 Posted September 8, 2020 (edited) All right -- I'll bite. Most of you know I actually have a 1936 all original J-35 -- although it was not called that until later. Mine was called a Trojan first and then a JUMBO35. Mine is a bit iconic because it is the only Trojan actually identified by name and FON in the shipping ledgers. I read all I could about the reissue -- it looks like a nice guitar, but they missed by a mile in MHO. First, they said they used AJ bracing -- HUH? That is quite different -- the angle on the AJ X is larger. And that is a big deal! Here are a couple of Henkograms of my 36 AJ and 36 Trojan. Remember my AJ is a rare 3 tone bar example. Also, the 1936 Trojan/J-35 is a very different guitar from 1938 J-35. The 36 models had basically a deeper JUMBO body while the 38 has an AJ body. I don't know why they do this -- there is nothing wrong with the way a 36 Trojan/Jumbo35 sounds.👍 http://vintageacousticinsruments.blogspot.com/http://www.vimeo.com/tpbiii Best, -Tom Edited September 8, 2020 by tpbiii 1 Quote
zombywoof Posted September 10, 2020 Posted September 10, 2020 An interesting example of how different ears can hear very different things. If anything though Gibson would have been closer to the mark had they dubbed this latest version of the J35 a 1941 or 1942 Historic. But I guess 1936 sounds a lot sexier. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.