Brucebubs Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 New comparison clip I found. OK, so maybe I'm just biased but I think the Gibson sounds better to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Pepper Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 (edited) Yes the Gibson guitar is going to sound better to a Gibson guy on a Gibson site. No new info there. It it was on the Martin site it would be reversed, I'm sure. How are you realistically going to compare a RW guitar to a Maple one, and both are two totally different body shapes. I own a D-41 and know it has a scale of 25.4", scalloped bracing and and ebony fretboard, RW back and sides and a Adi top. Not sure about the SJ-200's specs except it is a Maple back and sides guitar,. Edited December 1, 2020 by Sgt. Pepper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brucebubs Posted December 1, 2020 Author Share Posted December 1, 2020 3 minutes ago, Sgt. Pepper said: How are you going to compare a RW guitar to a Maple one, and both are two totally different body shapes. I own a D-41 and know it has scalloped bracing. Not sure abut the SJ-200. The 1957 SJ-200 has 'Traditional hand scalloped X-bracing'. I think the comparison here is not RW vs Maple or Jumbo vs Dreadnought but the difference between 2 completely different guitars with a similar cost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Pepper Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Brucebubs said: The 1957 SJ-200 has 'Traditional hand scalloped X-bracing'. I think the comparison here is not RW vs Maple or Jumbo vs Dreadnought but the difference between 2 completely different guitars with a similar cost. Ok if that was the point of it ,and it is yet another opportunity to say Gibson sounds better than Martin which is just a disappointing brand. Is a Corvette gonna drive differently than a Mustang or Camero? Yes their different animals. Edited December 1, 2020 by Sgt. Pepper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brucebubs Posted December 1, 2020 Author Share Posted December 1, 2020 For the record - Yes, I do own that exact same 1957 SJ-200 but I also own these 2 Martin guitars ... - 2009 Martin Grand J12-40E Special - 2011 Martin JDP II build #71 of 71 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluesKing777 Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 Here is the same guys with a 67 vs new: BluesKing777. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoSoxBiker Posted December 2, 2020 Share Posted December 2, 2020 14 hours ago, Sgt. Pepper said: Yes the Gibson guitar is going to sound better to a Gibson guy on a Gibson site. No new info there. It it was on the Martin site it would be reversed, I'm sure. How are you realistically going to compare a RW guitar to a Maple one, and both are two totally different body shapes. I own a D-41 and know it has a scale of 25.4", scalloped bracing and and ebony fretboard, RW back and sides and a Adi top. Not sure about the SJ-200's specs except it is a Maple back and sides guitar,. I thought you had a re-imagined series? Those/mine come with Sitka, not adi - at least to every site I've seen including Martin's. Is there a little secret I didn't know about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoSoxBiker Posted December 2, 2020 Share Posted December 2, 2020 (edited) For me, It's fun to pick out the contrasts or individual elements that they have. One comes at around 3:37 as the guy playing the SJ-200 jumps on the string attack pretty good and we get that Gibson growl. Nice! Do the same on the D-41 and the windows in my Living Room bulge outwards from the sonic blast that comes out as a result of doing the same. My RW version of the SJ-200 does the same as my Standard Maple version. Good times! Thanks for posting. (edit: I wanted to make it clear that I was not suggesting that my RW SJ-200 lacked the projection that my D41 has. To the contrary - it does quite well in that department. I was simply talking about the Gibson Growl at that point.) Edited December 3, 2020 by PatriotsBiker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombywoof Posted December 2, 2020 Share Posted December 2, 2020 (edited) Comparing guitars is generally bad business as our own biases do tend to determine the outcome. What I did find interesting is they demo'ed the guitars playing with bare fingers which is how I approach the things. While you are obviously not going to get the snap you do when some kind of pick is employed, I felt both sounded pretty flat and dull. They certainly did, however, respond far better to the more aggressive strumming attack which looks like the players were using the back of their nails. Edited December 2, 2020 by zombywoof Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Pepper Posted December 2, 2020 Share Posted December 2, 2020 1 hour ago, PatriotsBiker said: I thought you had a re-imagined series? Those/mine come with Sitka, not adi - at least to every site I've seen including Martin's. Is there a little secret I didn't know about? Maybe its Sitka. Some kind of Spruce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.