Mark Lee Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 What are your oppinion on a rosewood bridge versus a compensated aluminium bridge (not the adjustable Tuneomatic style) for an Emperor Regent? I've heard various opinions about them on acoustic archtops ranging from "they kill the acoustic tone"to "they make it sound like an orchestra". My Emperor Regent is my workhorse guitar, and I play it acoustically about as often as I play it plugged in. It has a very pleasing archtopesque acoustic tone, but I play a lot of rockabilly and the rosewood bridge dosnt help achieve that jangly tone, it seems more suited to jazz. Now for some physics. In my understanding, metal should be a better transmitter of sound (denser, less elastic equals a better energy transmitter) while wood should be inferior (softer, and hence more elastic, and less dense, like a shock absorber). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksdaddy Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 Metal may be a better transmitter of energy but that isn't necessarly good. The high frequencies are transferred with less loss in the metal bridge so what you will end up with is an unbalanced screechy tinny tone. Trust me, I know this firsthand. Efficiency isn't always the most desirable. If you don't want to believe it, I encourage you to buy or make a metal bridge and find out for yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riffster Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 A metal bridge would have to bring out the jangle but too much of it is not good. You should consider other woods as well, like ebony or maple. They are harder than Rosewood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Lee Posted March 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 soudnt the neck mounted floating pickup counterbalance the tone? do metal bridges have more harmonics? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L5Larry Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 This is a tough question, There are so many varibles involved. I've never had both a wooden brodge and a metal one on the same guitar, but I do have one each that's fit's this topic perfectly. My L-5CES has the Tune-O-Matic with the pickups cut into the top of of the guitar, and my L-7 has a rosewood bridge with a pickguard mounted floating pickup. The construction and design of the L-5 & L-7 are basically identical, same woods, same dimensions, etc. Although my two guitars were built 43 years apart, the L-5 is 20 years old, so I'd say it's wood has aged and mellowed also. I use the same strings on both, and play both through the same amp. As you might imagine they sound very different. The L-7 has a much more "woody" sound, the very traditional acoustic big-body archtop sound, even through the pickup. The L-5 sounds like, well, an L-5, much brighter and a little more "boomy". I would think the different pickups and mounting has a lot more to do with it than the bridges, and with these two guitars I have both ends of the scale, Tune-O-Matic with top mounted pickups, and rosewood bridge with a floating pickup. I wonder what the difference would be if I swapped bridges. These both are "working" guitars and are set-up the the "T", so I can't really go screwing around with swapping bridges. Sorry, I could make some sort of scientific experiment out of this bridge question, BUT... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.