rutledj Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 I'm looking to purchase a LP Studio (used) and really don't know much about the history of Gibson guitars, but it seems like I've read that there were some years where the quality wasn't as great as it could have been. Are there certain production years to avoid? Also wondering if anyone can compare the LP Studio with a PRS S2 singlecut as an LP alternative. I know the PRS doesn't have the maple cap so wondering if that would make it much darker sounding. Thanks, Rut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eracer_Team Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 (edited) People generally complain about the Norlin years 68-83, cause they started pancake bodies, supposed to have lowered their QC, but check out complaints of the new guitar QC. But that's subjective from guitar to guitar Where people buy guitars online sight unseen then complain the neck joint isn't totally stained the way they like it. Look at the guitar, as long as it's not fake, enjoy it Edited January 11, 2021 by Eracer_Team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merciful-evans Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 I don't think any PRS sounds like a Gibson LP. Don't get me wrong. I have a couple of PRS and like the way they sound. It's different to a Gibson though to my ears. PRS have a violin like whining tone. Alternatives: An Epiphone Tribute Plus will nail it. They have Gibson pickups (57 Classics). Some say Tokai Love Rock will get you close. Others say a Vintage V100MR Lemon Drop. Me? I'd just get a Gibson I think. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01GT eibach Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 3 hours ago, Eracer_Team said: People generally complain about the Norlin years 68-83, cause they started pancake bodies, supposed to have lowered their QC, I tend to think there is more than a noticeable difference between Kalamazoo-made and Nashville-made instruments, and the Nashville stuff is definitely not junk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rutledj Posted January 10, 2021 Author Share Posted January 10, 2021 I noticed that some of the studios have a 'T' in the model. I can't find what that stands for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabs Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 1 hour ago, rutledj said: I noticed that some of the studios have a 'T' in the model. I can't find what that stands for Traditional... Good and bad years. Not really a thing, just good and bad guitars for every year.. And even that is subjective and objective cos everyone likes different things... Early 90s Studios are kinda cool as they have an Ebony board.. After that you may want to avoid the 2015 models unless you like wide necks. After that its all good really.. You also have the Tribute series (and faded series) which are like Studios but less shiny (and a bit cheaper cos of that). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveFord Posted January 10, 2021 Share Posted January 10, 2021 Like Rabs said, 2015 had a really wide neck and a host of other innovations which weren't very well received. Other than that, they're all pretty much take them on their individual merits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larsongs Posted January 11, 2021 Share Posted January 11, 2021 Buy New & they come with a Ltd Lifetime Warranty. Also most reputable online Sellers like Sweetwater & others offer a 45 day no hassle Exchange or Return policy.. A hand made Intrument of any year can be a Diamond or it can be a Dud... If you can't get out & play any of them hedge your risk... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidblast Posted January 11, 2021 Share Posted January 11, 2021 "T" could be traditional as Rabs says,, but could also be "tribute" Either way the pretty much point to the same idea. years? hard to pick one,.. that all have to be judged one by one individually, you could study 10 and probably find variances in each one that speak to the quality control issues most of this is what you as the consumer are willing to accept, as it's most often times down to cosmetics and "fit & finish" kind of flaws. IMHO, A prs is not a substitute, it's a different animal entirely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.