hojo199 Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 I have spent my whole life (and I'm not young) seeking a tone. I finally found it. Traded a 2020 Martin OM21 and a Princeton Reverb reissue for it. It's perfect. Original and 100% crack/break free. Electric guitar action and no buzzing. BIG bottom.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jricc Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 Sweet J45 hojo! It looks to be in great condition too. Congrats and enjoy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j45nick Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 Nice looking, with a beautifully-faded cherryburst top. Can you check the width of the nut to tell us if it is 1 9/16", 1 5/8", or 1 11/16"? 1965 was a transition year for Gibson neck widths. Congratulations on a great find. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-minor7 Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 Oooohh, what a gem - it even looks like a 11/16. Be happy, , , and for the holy mackerel's sake don't ever change that saddle. Can't help asking if it was the Donovan sound you were after. . And the case it superb too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombywoof Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 (edited) Congrats! While I am not a fan of cherryburst finishes the faded ones do look a country mile better than what came fresh out of the factory. The guitar does seem to be in fine condition. Not only will you run into different nut widths on guitars built in 1965 as noted but a shallower headstock angle both of which were courtesy of the new automatic neck machines Gibson installed that year. What you get depends on when your guitar rolled out of the factory. Edited December 3, 2021 by zombywoof Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwlsky Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 That's a beauty. Congratulations on your find! I would ask you what was it about the tone that spoke to you, but I know words can fall short of describing it. I know I haven't found my perfect guitar yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hall Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 And, a well done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RvrDxn Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 Looks great, congrats! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cunningham26 Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 Love it- congrats! ive got a '68 and it's that dreamy tone that just sounds so GIBSON Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hojo199 Posted December 4, 2021 Author Share Posted December 4, 2021 23 hours ago, j45nick said: Nice looking, with a beautifully-faded cherryburst top. Can you check the width of the nut to tell us if it is 1 9/16", 1 5/8", or 1 11/16"? 1965 was a transition year for Gibson neck widths. Congratulations on a great find. It feels like 1 5/8" just a tad narrower than the 11/16" standard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hojo199 Posted December 4, 2021 Author Share Posted December 4, 2021 22 hours ago, E-minor7 said: Oooohh, what a gem - it even looks like a 11/16. Be happy, , , and for the holy mackerel's sake don't ever change that saddle. Can't help asking if it was the Donovan sound you were after. . It's "Fire and "Rain" is what it is. I am not changing the saddle. I had a '68 once and did that and it ruined the tone. I don't want a modern sound. I want THIS sound! Think the saddle is 1 5/8' just a touch narrower than the 1 11/16" And the case it superb too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thegreatgumbino Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 Congratulations! The top has aged nicely, but the back is beautiful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boyd Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 Very nice! And it looks exactly like my 1965 J-50. Funny, I had to look closely at your picture to see the difference. The finish on mine is just as dark as yours and yours has darkened so much that the burst is hardly noticeable. Mine has the original rosewood adjustable saddle however, is that the original on yours or a replacement? FWIW, I wouldn't want "electric guitar action" on any acoustic - but the nice thing about the ADJ bridge is that it's easy to change. Enjoy your new vintage guitar! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuestionMark Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 That’s a beautiful guitar! Congratulations! QM aka “Jazzman” Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-minor7 Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 (edited) Be happy, , , and for the holy mackerel's sake don't ever change that saddle. Can't help asking if it was the Donovan sound you were after. . 10 hours ago, hojo199 said: It's "Fire and "Rain" is what it is. I am not changing the saddle. I had a '68 once and did that and it ruined the tone. I don't want a modern sound. I want THIS sound! Think the saddle is 1 5/8' just a touch narrower than the 1 11/16" Aha, I see and understand, , , then have to ask if you are aware that Taylor played that song on the rosewood version of the saddle. . 🧐 Edited December 5, 2021 by E-minor7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hojo199 Posted December 5, 2021 Author Share Posted December 5, 2021 On 12/3/2021 at 10:12 AM, Kwlsky said: That's a beauty. Congratulations on your find! I would ask you what was it about the tone that spoke to you, but I know words can fall short of describing it. I know I haven't found my perfect guitar yet. "Fire and Rain" every note. Has that JT 1970 J50 tone when fingerpicked -- I mean exact! When strummed it's got that Beatles, Donovan thing. Sonically -- VERY deep without mud. Crisp enough with no harshness.... Not super loud, great to sing over Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hojo199 Posted December 5, 2021 Author Share Posted December 5, 2021 16 hours ago, E-minor7 said: Be happy, , , and for the holy mackerel's sake don't ever change that saddle. Can't help asking if it was the Donovan sound you were after. . Aha, I see and understand, , , then have to ask if you are aware that Taylor played that song on the rosewood version of the saddle. . 🧐 Oh yeah, but it doesn't matter. It's got it. As I said, I'm not messing with this one.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hojo199 Posted December 5, 2021 Author Share Posted December 5, 2021 23 hours ago, Boyd said: Very nice! And it looks exactly like my 1965 J-50. Funny, I had to look closely at your picture to see the difference. The finish on mine is just as dark as yours and yours has darkened so much that the burst is hardly noticeable. Mine has the original rosewood adjustable saddle however, is that the original on yours or a replacement? FWIW, I wouldn't want "electric guitar action" on any acoustic - but the nice thing about the ADJ bridge is that it's easy to change. Enjoy your new vintage guitar! You know, when the action is super low like that and it doesn't buzz anywhere, it's a thing of beauty.It had 10's on it when I got it, and I put 12's on it and had to adjust exactly nothing. That is remarkable -- two string sizes and the guitar doesn't move at all.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-minor7 Posted December 6, 2021 Share Posted December 6, 2021 9 hours ago, hojo199 said: Oh yeah, but it doesn't matter. It's got it. As I said, I'm not messing with this one.... Wouldn't doubt you and have to say that the 3-4 early 60s adj. bridge J-45s I've tried all were terrific. I like my own a lot too - but that one has the controversial and special plastic bridge, , , , which won't be replaced as long as it belongs to this temple. 1963 ~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoSoxBiker Posted December 8, 2021 Share Posted December 8, 2021 Congratulations! I agree with On 12/4/2021 at 10:01 AM, thegreatgumbino said: Congratulations! The top has aged nicely, but the back is beautiful. That back looks sensational. I know that's just a bonus compared to tone and playbility and all, but it sure is purty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.