Homz Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 The hijack my thread, thread. Sometimes I think there needs to be a thread to just say anything you have on your mind. Go for it. "I like Strawberry's".
Murph Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 First post here. Hey guys? Are tube amps louder than solid state amps? And, another question.... Do chambered guitars suck? Thanks in advance. Best of luck. Murph.....
The Mick Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.southernplate.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/milk-gravy.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.southernplate.com/2008/07/how-to-make-sausage-milk-gravy.html&usg=__qPSeDxTuV1GIa-C_iq_X8m4s1Is=&h=1200&w=1600&sz=189&hl=en&start=157&um=1&tbnid=UnzjO0fTVjahoM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dgravy%26ndsp%3D18%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1C1CHMG_enUS309US309%26sa%3DN%26start%3D144%26um%3D1
The Mick Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 http://www.southernplate.com/2008/07/how-to-make-sausage-milk-gravy.html
Homz Posted May 28, 2009 Author Posted May 28, 2009 First post here. Hey guys? Are tube amps louder than solid state amps? And' date=' another question.... Do chambered guitars suck? Thanks in advance. Best of luck. Murph.....[/quote'] My 07 LP Standard does not suck. It kicks a$$.
callen3615 Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 First post here. Hey guys? Are tube amps louder than solid state amps? And' date=' another question.... Do chambered guitars suck? Thanks in advance. Best of luck. Murph.....[/quote'] How do I avoid cheap chinese gibsons?
KSG_Standard Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 I would hope that a wise white man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Latina woman who hasn’t lived that life.
AXE® Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 How do I avoid cheap chinese gibsons? Stay away from cheap chinese salesmen.
KSG_Standard Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 ...The GOP should structure its opposition to Sotomayor by focusing on two fundamental points. The first is her ability to thoughtfully interpret the Constitution. Translation: fairness. She has made questionable statements and rulings in the past that warrant this inquiry. Specifically the comments she offered about ethnicity, whether or not judges can put their personal “sympathies” aside and do their job, and her ruling on the New Haven firefighters’ affirmative action case. The second challenge should be directed at Obama: is Sotomayor a tool to advance the president’s world view that the irresponsible will be rewarded at the expense of the responsible? Obama’s vision is one that comes to the rescue of people who bought homes they couldn’t afford, companies who made terrible business decisions; a dogma that perpetuates weapons of class destruction, and the belief that a safety net should be the norm, not an aberration. It is much like the “critical” legal theory that elite law schools like Harvard have been teaching for more than a decade. It’s a theory that both Obama and his nominee ascribe to and seek to put into practice. The basis of critical theory is that there is no objectivity in the law. Legal positions are based upon one’s background, ethnicity, wealth (or lack thereof), etc. The law is just an equalizer –- a power tool to be used by various groups and the key to good legal judgment is “empathy” with the poor, the downtrodden, etc. The first commandment is: don’t let the powerful and rich use the law to their advantage.... http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/05/28/tantaros_sotomayor_obama/ ...Although CLS has been largely a U.S. movement, it was influenced to a great extent by European philosophers, such as nineteenth-century German social theorists Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, and Max Weber; Max Horkheimer and Herbert Marcuse of the Frankfurt school of German social philosophy; the Italian marxist Antonio Gramsci; and poststructuralist French thinkers Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida, representing respectively the fields of history and literary theory. CLS has borrowed heavily from Legal Realism, the school of legal thought that flourished in the 1920s and 1930s. Like CLS scholars, legal realists rebelled against accepted legal theories of the day and urged more attention to the social context of the law... http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/Critical_legal_theory
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.