MojoRedFoot Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Why do some people wrap the strings around the stop tail piece on a TOM bridge? Just curious. I see it once in a while but never tried it. Does it do something to the sustain? I'm using what I remember from college physics to figure out the benefit. Any insight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepblue Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Some say its more string to stop bar contact so that = more sustain. I just hate the way it looks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LPguitarman Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I also don't like the way it looks. I've heard it is less tension on the strings, easier bends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksdaddy Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I've seen some like that too. Could be a fad, could be a strange misinterpretation of how it's 'supposed' to be strung, or it could have something to do with string tension. Back in the 80s I sold a Hondo LP Special style to a guy. He complained it felt stiff. I raised the tailpiece a little, changing the string's break angle over the saddles. He thought I was a magician or something. I don't know if it really had any effect or if it was all in his head. But I do believe there should be a difference in tension there, and maybe a difference in tone as a result, but I don't know if the difference is dramatic enough for our fingers and ears to really notice. 'Your mileage may vary' and all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twiz Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I top-wrap. I really can't tell a difference one way or another -tone wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MojoRedFoot Posted January 22, 2010 Author Share Posted January 22, 2010 In that case, I'll leave it as is. I only use 10-46 so string bends are not hard. Thanks for the input everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saturn Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I've tried it both ways (go ahead and make a joke here). Haven't seen much difference. Notice the very slight angle here When I string it normal, some of the strings actually touch the back side of my bridge because of the steep string angle. Some people claim that is a "tone sucker" but I haven't noticed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laaz Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 It also scratches the hell out of your tail piece. Tried it and saw no difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruznolfart Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Seems to me one of the gods tried it back in the 60s and some peeps convinced themselves it was the super-secret tone acquiring trick that only one guitar-god in the entire universe used. They have kept the secret to themselves for all these years. No one knows about it. :- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Plains Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I couldn't hear a difference but could definitely feel a difference. I don't like how the strings feel when they're top wrapped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVOL! Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I top wrapped before I put the Bigsby on my SG. I liked it because it gave me another place to strum to make the guitar squeal. http://www.myspace.com/dundrearies That shattering glass noise at the beginning of Disappearing Ink is me strumming between the bridge and tail piece, strings top wrapped, through a fuzz box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigh Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Didn't Billy Gibbons string up Pearly Gates that way? Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirstMeasure Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Isn't there a Tailpiece that's designed to Wrap Around and isn't it older than the Stop Tailpiece? Perhaps that's where the whole Top Wrapped Stop Tailpiece thing started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJustice Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 If anything, since less pressure is put on the saddles with "top-wrapping" you should get less sustain... Yet another useless guitar myth? DJ -- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundergod Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 It's all a myth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockman82 Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I top wrap because my tailpiece is worn out. I had to top wrap my strings to prevent them from breaking. The strings slots on the tail piece got so rough that they would break my high e string. I did get them filed down, but i wasn't confident enough that they wouldn't break so i top wrapped. Personally, it doesn't bother me. I think it looks cool even though it might not give a difference on sustain. I also like it because the tailpiece looks like those old Les Paul and SG Jrs that had the wrap around bridge instead of the stop bar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Lee Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I wrap it under the tailpiece to get a more acute angle between the strings and the bridge. it takes a little longer to get the strings threaded through but I think it does help the tone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surfpup Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I top wrap. It works for me, and Billy Gibbons, and AXE®.... enough said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saturn Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 If you plan to top-wrap, here's a little thing I learned. It might be easier to remove the stopp-bar completely and thread all the strings through before setting the stop-bar back in place. I find it hard to get the strings to go though "backwards" with the stop-tail inplace. Plus, the strings come out the other side at a down angle and can dig into your top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoConMan Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Here's everything I know about it; www.rattlesnakeroadhouse.com/TopWrapping.html "Hell, maybe you could top wrap the headstock and bring the strings over the Gibson logo..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockman82 Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Honestly, just stringing through normally gave my strings a greater chance of breaking. Now having a new tailpiece would solve that, but top-wrapping saved my guitar strings lol If i get a new tailpiece for my SG, i'll string through again. But to me, either way works good. I've had my strings top wrapped since last September, and i haven't had a problem yet. But i agree with most people. I don't think it changes the sound, and i don't think it makes a difference in feel. People probably do it for looks, and people probably hate it because of how it looks. But in the end, a guitar's just a guitar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoConMan Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 1975 Peavey T-60 (Right Handed) I thought 1978 was the first year for the T-40/T-60. I have one of each, 1979 and 1980. Great pieces! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:oilpit: Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 I've topwrapped ever since I first heard about it. However on my LP with an ABR bridge, topwrapping the bass strings doesn't leave enough downward pressure on the bridge to keep the strings in the saddles, they flop all over the place. So I started regular wrapping the bass strings, and topwrapping the treble strings. I did it once, then I just sorta kept doing it, and now I string up all my TOM guitars as such. The biggest (and only) advantage to this is that the guitar doesn't go out of tune as much when you hit chords a little harder than you should. It looks weird as **** though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badbluesplayer Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 Neo's right about string tension. Changing the break angle over the bridge does not effect sting tension, and does not change how hard it is to bend strings. All it does is change the amount of downward force on the bridge. The string tension in front of the bridge and behind the bridge is always the same, regardless of the break angle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brundaddy Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 If I tend to break strings at the bridge on any given guitar, I'll top wrap. Say what you will but it seems to drastically lessen string breakage for me. And I really don't think there is any difference in tone or tension at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.