Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

What is the model of this Gibson Les Paul ?????


DavidSantos84

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello

 

I bought a Gibson Les Paul but i don't know what exact model it is

 

could someone help me

 

thanks

 

 

the serial number is 92352358

 

If anyone teach me how to put photos in here i have photos of the guitar

Posted

HI see your from Portugal so you'll have to call the European offices and

from other post I've read you are not going to get much info. So I called

here in US That serial # came up as a 1992 Translucent Red Les Paul Studio Lite

with 500R bridge pup and 496T neck Pup with gold hardware. Does this

sound like it is your Guitar? Welcome to the forum

 

CW

Posted
I called here in US That serial # came up as a 1992 Translucent Red Les Paul Studio Lite

with 500R bridge pup and 496T neck Pup with gold hardware. Does this

sound like it is your Guitar? Welcome to the forum

 

CW

 

That was very nice of you.

Posted
That was very nice of you.

 

Well thank you KL. I have seen Neo assist people hear the same way and

thought why not Gibson is not to busy Sat. mornings got right throught.

 

CW

Posted
HI see your from Portugal so you'll have to call the European offices and

from other post I've read you are not going to get much info. So I called

here in US That serial # came up as a 1992 Translucent Red Les Paul Studio Lite

with 500R bridge pup and 496T neck Pup with gold hardware. Does this

sound like it is your Guitar? Welcome to the forum

 

CW

 

Yes that's my Guitar thank you very much you all

 

what do you think about the guitar????

Posted

What do you mean?

 

Is it any good?

Sure!

 

Is it worth a lot of money?

Not in the USA, but all that is different in other countries.

 

Should play and sound very much like a Les Paul Standard of the same vintage.

The biggest difference is the lack of body binding and some cosmetic goodies.

 

If it's in good shape after 20 years, it's probably a keeper.

Trans Red usually looks pretty nice, depends on the wood grain showing through.

 

Gold hardware is a personal taste issue - I don't like it.

It tarnishes and discolors easily, is it still in good shape on your guitar?

 

I don't recall what the Studio Lite was - chambered maybe?

At the very least, it has Swiss Cheese holes drilled in the body beneath the Maple cap.

 

The ceramic pickups are way too harsh and bright for my tastes.

If you play some heavy music, they may work for you.

If you don't like them, a pickup swap is easy.

 

(It may have already been done - many people removed those pickups....)

 

 

 

Keep it and play the hell out of it!

Congrats, and welcome to the forum.

 

 

Oh, and good job CW!

 

[biggrin][cool]

Posted
What do you mean?

 

Is it any good?

Sure!

 

Is it worth a lot of money?

Not in the USA' date=' but all that is different in other countries.

 

Should play and sound very much like a Les Paul Standard of the same vintage.

The biggest difference is the lack of body binding and some cosmetic goodies.

 

If it's in good shape after 20 years, it's probably a keeper.

Trans Red usually looks pretty nice, depends on the wood grain showing through.

 

Gold hardware is a personal taste issue - I don't like it.

It tarnishes and discolors easily, is it still in good shape on your guitar?

 

I don't recall what the Studio Lite was - chambered maybe?

At the very least, it has Swiss Cheese holes drilled in the body beneath the Maple cap.

 

The ceramic pickups are way too harsh and bright for my tastes.

If you play some heavy music, they may work for you.

If you don't like them, a pickup swap is easy.

 

(It may have already been done - many people removed those pickups....)

 

 

 

Keep it and play the hell out of it!

Congrats, and welcome to the forum.

 

 

Oh, and good job CW!

 

[blink]:-k

 

Thank You very much

Posted
I don't recall what the Studio Lite was - chambered maybe?

 

By 1992 the Studio Lite had an area cut out inside similar to the chambered models but this was filled with balsa wood. It also had a slimmer neck than usual and, as a result, was reckoned to be a couple of pounds lighter.

 

Welcome to the forum, DavidSantos.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...