Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Is this a pricing mistake?


LarryUK

Recommended Posts

If you look at the site pics. The green is all green and the blue is just the front. So really the green should cost more.

If this is the way Gibson are now. The Feds can have them.

I really think they should comment on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at the site pics. The green is all green and the blue is just the front. So really the green should cost more. ....

 

Over $1000 for one side of paint!?!

 

No way.

 

Check the 2008 STD - like $400 difference between the transparent finishes and the solid colors. - http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Electric-Guitars/Les-Paul/Gibson-USA/2008-Les-Paul-Standard.aspx

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before anyone say's that 'if you don't like it, buy another brand'. It's not the brand that's in question here. I can understand a price premium for a nice top. But some of these are ridiculous. It's just paint! You might say that 'it's the mssp. But it should be reasonable at the start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That kind of pricing difference is indefensible as far as I'm concerned,there can be no logical reason for this kind of difference other than it being a glaring misprint or just plain gouging at its absolute worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That kind of pricing difference is indefensible as far as I'm concerned,there can be no logical reason for this kind of difference other than it being a glaring misprint or just plain gouging at its absolute worst.

 

 

You're not wrong. [thumbdn]

 

I'm with you on that score.

 

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...