guitarondy Posted February 19, 2012 Posted February 19, 2012 gee i wish gibson would stop putting factory fitted scratch plates, leave it to the player. the guitar looks better without one.
Rabs Posted February 19, 2012 Posted February 19, 2012 They do on some models.. I have a 2008 Standard that comes with it in the case but not fitted... :)
Tim Plains Posted February 19, 2012 Posted February 19, 2012 I disagree. I don't like the look of any LP without it.
cjmwrx Posted February 19, 2012 Posted February 19, 2012 I disagree. I don't like the look of any LP without it. +1
Dg77 Posted February 20, 2012 Posted February 20, 2012 I disagree. I don't like the look of any LP without it. It's an iconic look
Gary Moore Tribute Posted February 20, 2012 Posted February 20, 2012 To me it depends on the Finish, The nicer the top the MORE you want to show it off This is true with my Cherry Std & Desert Trd. However with more simple finishes it doesn't look right without the pickguard on. In my case a Gold top & Plain Honeyburst...
STAR CHILD Posted February 20, 2012 Posted February 20, 2012 I disagree. I don't like the look of any LP without it. R9 you are totally correct! A Les Paul looks naked without a pick-guard!!!!
BigKahune Posted February 20, 2012 Posted February 20, 2012 R9 you are totally correct! A Les Paul looks naked without a pick-guard!!!! The LP in your avatar is naked. . B) .
L5Larry Posted February 20, 2012 Posted February 20, 2012 Cosmetically, I go through phases with my LP and 345, on, off, on, off....... Currently they are both ON. Plus, I've played so much jazz the past few years, that my right hand style almost requires the "pickguard" as a "finger rest". I even did a full blown "elevated finger rest" mod to my 345, jacking the front edge up off the body with spacers.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.