Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

mbberry

All Access
  • Posts

    161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mbberry

  1. Wow let me count the ways.. CTS pots for starters which is a big deal in terms of tone. Replaced the standard Grovers with tulip tuners. Cosmetically they have the correct pickguard, blank truss cover, correct headstock inlay, binding on the neck, the new improved headstock and importantly to me but not a big deal to most they’ve done away with the sunburst on the rims of the body

    • Thanks 1
  2. Hi Valery! Terribly sorry for not replying sooner. I don’t have notifications set up and didn’t realise you had commented. I assume you found the information you needed but in case you didn’t here goes...

    -volume and tone knobs: they will  have to be metric if you aren’t replacing the pots. They’re easy to find on ebay

    -knob pointers: as far as I know any will fit. It’s not a real snug fit on the post, they are held in place by the nut

    -nut: the nut and the electronics were done by a guitar tech

    -truss rod cover: that took a bit of modding. I used a small piece of cork painted black to go in the hole for the truss rod for on screw and made a new screw hole for the other. A little dab of paint in the existing screw holes makes them barely noticeable

    -tuners: vintage style klusons fit the existing hole. Modern grovers with the nut and washer would require enlarging the hole

    -pickguard: this was the trickiest bit. If you want to use the same bracket there are options available on eBay. Be sure to measure the distance between you pickups. I’m not certain a dot replacement pickguard will fit without modification

    -pickup surround screws: I bought from Stew Mac. If I remember correctly I bought two different lengths

    -pickup selector switch: if you just want to replace the tip you’ll need to buy metric. Standard Gibson won’t fit

    Hope this helps. Again sorry for the late reply

  3. With the news that nothing is changing with the Dot I thought now would be a good time to post my “1962 ES-335 TDC”. It began life as an LE ES-335 PRO but the only thing that’s still original are the frets. I swapped the pups for Seymour Duncan Seth Lovers, controls were replaced with CTS pots and pickup selector and Gibson Bumblebee caps. Swapped the tuners for Kluson double rings, the nut replaced with a Nubone. Bridge was replaced with a period correct ABR-1 tune-o-matic. Added the period correct truss rod cover, knob pointers and strap buttons. I had to get a little creative to get a pickguard bracket given the depth of the Epi compared to Gibby. Bought an ES and a mandolin bracket and mix matched the two. It’s holdong up a period correct Gibson style pickguard. This is a guitar that is truly “Inspired By Gibson”

    9Uy8LOE.png

    CcfHTTb.jpg

    LEs9hxo.jpg

    luW47Ns.jpg

    doM9tZv.jpg

    mkLlZ42.jpg

    h0DNrOh.jpg

    S7PRngE.jpg

    • Like 1
  4. Surely this isn’t what they mean by “revamped ES line”. If it is though it would explain why it was left out of the promo shots. Not exactly “Inspired By Gibson” with the old headstock shape, black nut, epiphone shaped pickguard, and no neck binding. Disappointing to say the least

  5. I've always preferred the Gibson headstock, on Epi guitars that are of Gibson designs. Les Paul, SG, 335, etc. Like the ones

    for the "Japanese Only" market! I'd like to see Epiphone do that, on all those (Gibson) clone models. The Epiphone original

    designs, should retain the Epi headstock, be it the extended "hourglass" or the clipped cornered "Jazz Box" verion(s).

    The exception, for me, would be on the Sheraton. I love the old "Kalamazoo" era headstock, as opposed to the clipped corner

    version they're using now...which, to ME, is too large for the Thin-line Sheraton body. To me, it looks out of proportion.

    But, that's just ME. [tongue][biggrin]

     

     

    CB

     

    Couldn’t have said it better myself CB

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...