Randwulf
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Randwulf
-
-
Well, the more things change, the more they stay the same. I worked for Gibson from the late 70s through the early 80s at the Nashville plant, back when it was new. Norlin Industries owned the brand at that time. I built Les Pauls and SGs. We were always changing things and experimenting with new tone woods. We actually ran a batch of Les Paul bodies made of oak, if you can imagine that. The things weighed a ton. Then there was The Paul made of walnut, which were actually good guitars. The Firebrand was another short-lived LP and SG model. Models come and go. It's all about the bottom line, which is the way of things. Get 'em while you can.
- 1
- 1
-
Same here. I really like mine.
-
Too much Gibson stuff apparently goes bye bye.
-
Damn. What is Gibson doing, cleaning house? This sure doesn't sound like an effective strategy for attracting new customers. Yeah, hardycreek1, I'm hanging on to my G-45, too.
-
Thanks, kidblast. Yeah, that's what I figured. If they were selling them, they'd still be making them. They are good guitars, though, or at least the studio version is, which is the only one I have experience with. I would think more people would be into them. I guess folks just prefer the more classic Gibson models. Yes, I'm glad I got one. And I'll be keeping it.
-
There it is. The answer. Common man be damned . I'll hang on to my G-45 and keep playing my Seagulls as a member of the proletariat!
-
Thanks again, Sgt. Pepper. Seems like a strange way to run things. I think the G-45 is a winner--sustainable woods, solid wood construction, and, to me, a really nice tone. I have enjoyed the walnut/spruce combination. Granted, I haven't played $2,000+ Gibson acoustics, but that's the point; the G-45 represents Gibson tone and quality in an affordable, relatively speaking, guitar. The discontinuation doesn't make sense to me unless the powers-that-be have decided to go with the J-15, which is damn near twice as much as the G-45. Oh, well.
-
Thanks, Sgt. Pepper. Seems strange to discontinue a model that was introduced less than two years ago. Interesting. I'm glad I got mine when I did.
-
I was wondering if the G-45 has been discontinued. If so, does anyone know why? I have the Studio version and think it's a really nice guitar , especially for someone who wants a Gibson but can't afford an expensive one. Thanks.
G-45 discontinued?
in The Gibson Lounge
Posted
All kinds of them, brother.