![](http://content.invisioncic.com/p286412/set_resources_3/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
TIMT
-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by TIMT
-
-
23 hours ago, E-minor7 said:
Early 68, , , guess we see from the still thin back braces. I have an SJ from that same year (or could be 69), which has moved into the bulkier business.
Do try to find an original ceramic saddle - will change the sound significantly and it's fun to switch back'n'forth while learning.Enjoy this well-kept beauty and send us a video.
Welcome aboard
Thanks for your observation of the thin braces. I was expecting the guitar to feel heavier than it is. I'm looking for a ceramic saddle, but for now I have a bone saddle I'll try. My main guitar is a Santa Cruz TR, so this Hummingbird is definitely different! Thankfully the guitar strings were slacked for storage and there is little top deformation. Overall, there's not a nick or scratch anywhere - looks like my wife's uncle didn't go far in his learning/playing.
-
Here's that virtually untouched early '68 Hummingbird. Notice the screws attaching the pickguard, belly-up bridge, gold Klusons, and the oval orange label. Original case.
-
Hello Forum
Just inherited a virtually unplayed '67 Hummingbird Natural from a relative of my wife. Luckily the strings were slacked on it and it was stored in a controlled environment. To say it looks like a new guitar would be an understatement. I'm having fun exploring the sound and feel of this mahogany/spruce guitar with a narrow nut. It's a bit different from my Santa Cruz Tony Rice, but I like the mid-frequency emphasis and the blended sound. I'll stick with my Tony Rice for lead flatpicking, but this 'Bird is fun.
Official HUMMINGBIRD owners thread!
in Gibson Acoustic
Posted · Edited by TIMT
updated picture