Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

golfski

All Access
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by golfski

  1.  

    28 minutes ago, Sgt. Pepper said:

    I can tell you it is not a Streetmaster. Those look like poo, IMHO. I've seen them in person and they look even worse than online. That red-ish one is terrible and the brown ones are not much better.

    Here is what an SM looks like.

    https://www.musiciansfriend.com/guitars/martin-special-omc-15me-streetmaster-style-acoustic-electric-guitar/l47598000001000?rNtt=Martin 15 Series OMC-15ME streetmaster&index=1

    haha, like your description of the looks.  Is it just about looks or the sound for you on the SM?  I do remember the SM had no pick guard which was why I didn't like it - but I swear I looked at one that wasn't RED like the one you linked to, it looked just like this one above but no pick guard - maybe a little darker...

  2. 6 minutes ago, depechebaseball said:

    Getting Antsy,  hoping the Guitar Center folks come through!!! Congrats to all of the people who have received theirs!  

    I got my ordered at GC as well, I paid for it back in April or May and got a receipt picture about 4 weeks ago and this morning I got an email saying that my order was being prepared and shipped out.  Curious to your experience with GC.  I called the 800 number and the SA said I am guaranteed one...but I'll be antsy like you until its in hand (or at least tracking number included).

  3. 4 hours ago, EdVed77 said:

    Some pictures….

    3EAF4AB1-CEBA-47B3-BBCD-39C818B3E542.jpeg

    B30427D6-57D8-4E61-84D2-2A9F0C586344.jpeg

    82FE76F4-4423-49EE-A997-5012588B8352.jpeg

    C6D972AE-9DA7-4EA8-8D1E-7955B4465640.jpeg

    That thing looks gorgeous!  

    Any chance you can confirm the specs for Nut Width and neck depth with some calipers?  Would love to understand the neck shape based on the specs shared a couple weeks ago, it seems the J-150 has a slimmer neck (1 11/16 vs. 1.725 on standard).

    Got an email from GC today saying mine would be here on 7/1...

    • Like 1
  4. 2 hours ago, E-minor7 said:

    The purpose is to guard the upper zone - as simple as that. And for some it is necessary.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          You would be able to remove the unwanted one with naphtha, , , but prepare for a tan-line that it will take a bout 4 years to even out. 
     

                               You'll probably hear a bit more sound too, even feel a freer vibe - depending on the sensibility of your senses. . 

    Would that be true for a brand new guitar?  This is a new amber burst SJ-200, is that tan line thing for new and used or just used ones?

  5. I came across an SJ-200, I believe Bob Dillan style with double pick guard.  Just curious what the purpose is of double pick guard?  I assume to stop scratching on the low side of the strings but is there any other purpose?  

    If I picked up a SJ-200 with double pick guard, can you remove one of them if you don't like it?  I can't tell if it looks good or not so was curious given that this guitar seems to cost a few hundred $ extra new vs. single pick guard is it just ascetics or other purpose.

  6. 5 minutes ago, Sgt. Pepper said:

    On the Noel I see no neck binding, and the bridge has 2 sections of abalone where the SJ-200 has 4 (2 in front of and 2 behind the pins, the Noel only has them after the pins). Not sure if both are the same size and what the bracing on either are. The SJ-200 has the TRC routed to show more of the white layer. The headstock is bound on the SJ and not on the Noel. The pickguard on the SJ has orange on the end of the stems of I guess they are supposed to be flowers, and on the Noel look white.  Both bodies are bound and both appear to have B/W/B/W/B in the binding. I guess when Gibson releases the specs you will know. I'd say with the money you saved off your new one you should fidelity get one. Then you can play Champagne Supernova.

    lol, but Champagne Supernova already sounds so good on my SJ-200!  Thanks for the details, I am leaning more and more towards skipping this and just keeping my SJ-200.  On the bridge, I think the 4 inlays vs. 2 is also a difference of the SJ-200 Standard vs. Original - on my Standard I have two of them like the NG J-150, while I think the original series has the 4.  

    • Like 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Brucebubs said:

    Easy, it's an SJ-200 with 50 good things missing.

    Curious what these differences are?  I understand the no-binding but outside that it seems to be the same - flamed maple, vintage tuners, etc.  Seems very different from the J-200 studio that are stripped down.  

     

    I ask because I just got a newer SJ-200 (see other thread I started) and have an option to buy one of these NG J-150's and going to be presented with this decision.  I got a discount on the SJ-200 since it was a NOS with some issues, so the SJ-200 is actually cheaper than the J-150 for me.

  8. 8 hours ago, Jinder said:

    I agree. Nothing wrong with a 150 and I’m sure the NG signature model will be very good, but personally I wouldn’t return a 200 to trade downwards in terms of appointments and spec. 

    I am not sure if its serendipity, that the NG 150 came into this discussion because my sales guy actually called me yesterday and said he could get me the NG J-150!  So now, I think I am going to be in this exact situation!!!

     

    Do I keep this Sj-200 at a discount or take the NG 150 @ $4299?  Or Keep both?

     

    The reason I know about these guitars is because of Noel and Oasis, its the reason I started playing guitar in the first place.  I think I would prefer no binding on the neck - but is the neck the same shape/size?

    • Like 1
  9. 1 hour ago, fortyearspickn said:

    "... these guitars have survived World Wars and still work beautifully and I worry that this sound is set it my ear and won't be able to replicate.  When I bought my LP, I bought a 50's Standard and loved the sound of it.  My teacher said the fretboard was a little dry so I took it back to the store..."

    Very Interesting ....

    Excuse my ignorance, but what was interesting?  The fretboard being dry?  I applied some conditioner and now it looks much better.  

  10. Been tracking this 🙂.  Based on comments in the thread on Youtube, someone said they pre-ordered in UK at £3799

     

    "Well just spoken to a reputable guitar shop today and they have 3 coming just preordered and payed deposit 😎 £3799 is the UK price It's a lot of money but I gotta have this gem for me collection. I can not wait for the call to say its in shop."

    • Like 1
  11. 2 minutes ago, Sgt. Pepper said:

    You seem to keep finding stuff wrong with a guitar that was sitting around at GC since late 2019. Who knows how many people and employees took liberties with it in the over a year it was there. If you send it back is GC going to consider it a used guitar and give the next buyer the 20% off or will it go back up in price to close to what they originally sold it to you for? You gotta decide if all the stuff you are finding is acceptable to you even with the about $900 they returned to you and what will you find at day 41 when its too late to return it?

    That last part is my biggest worry - so as long as these things are not structural I am not concerned...the cosmetic stuff doesn't bother me anymore like it did at full price!  Part of my worry is I keep playing it and falling more and more in love :) I am not looking for these things on purpose, just giving everything a thorough once over so I limit the unknowns.

    To be honest, given that I am a noob, I am not sure what to care about and what not to care about, which is why I keep posting these findings.  The perfectionist in me always wants a clean slate - but the practical side of me knows these guitars have survived World Wars and still work beautifully and I worry that this sound is set it my ear and won't be able to replicate.  When I bought my LP, I bought a 50's Standard and loved the sound of it.  My teacher said the fretboard was a little dry so I took it back to the store to look at it and they wanted to exchange it.  I hated the sound of that replacement so much I went back and exchanged it back for the original LP I had and just applied some conditioner :) and couldn't be happier. 

  12. Thanks for the continued wonderful information!  I am loving this SJ200!  I might be too much in love at this point to go back :). I'm going to contact Gibson to validate warranty info and if this should be resolved (and can be easily/quickly) and then will go from there.  Given the few posts I have seen about this on J200 style bridges, seems cosmetic and not structural to the bridge...to fortyears point, how that she's in bed with me, I don't think I'd kick her out for these issues.

     

    I recorded my practice last night with an SM57, holy moly does this guitar sound great under a mic!  I actually found myself playing and listening through my headphones as it sounded so good! 

  13. Ok, one more thing I found on the guitar.  I have been looking online and there seems to some precedence for this - I took guitar to luthier (at GC) and they said it looks great and did a string change and setup and its playing nice.  

    As seen in this post below, I have a similar yet much smaller thing going on.  I noticed I could slide a corner of a paper under one of the mustache ends ever so slightly, I posted my image here - https://ibb.co/DWJtmYJ.  It’s about half the amount of that other poster.  I can’t imagine the curls of the mustache actually provide any stability?  The core of the bridge seems very very very stable and not bulging or anything - humidity is right around 41/42*.

     

    Would this change anyone’s  opinion?  It seems like something that would be covered by warranty if needed to be fixed.   These are just hard to find and I am really enjoying this one!  I don’t want overlook anything serious but also have oddly been at ease with the cosmetic stuff as I know what I will do to it. 

     

  14. 3 minutes ago, Sgt. Pepper said:

    I can do the math and that is not a bad price for that, you have to decide if you can live with it being road worn without the super inflated price.

    Yeah - the nice thing is I have 40 days left to figure that out 🙂, but at this point I am inclined to keep it under the assumption this is a finish issue and one that isn't unique to this guitar but as 62burst pointed out has happened to him and I've seen other reviews about Gibson and these imprints.  My biggest concern was storage and if that was indication of improper humidity and longer term problems I could have.    However, if that NG J-150 sig model comes out in the next 40 days and I can get one (I asked GC and they can't get it) then either she gets a sibling or I may be much more inclined to return this one for that.  

     

    One other question that will help me make a decision is around Gibson warranty.  I read that they are not transferable?  So, if that is true, I feel like I got a steal in that I got a 'used' guitar at a used guitar price, but I still have full warranty since it was technically sold as new.  

     

    if you look at Reverb, even the few year old used ones are selling around MSRP for a new one since they are hard to find and not a high volume guitar.  

  15. 14 minutes ago, Sgt. Pepper said:

    Did you just get it and did they charge you the 2019 price since that is what it is, or a 2021 price, minus the 20% discount?

    They charged me 2021 price.  I don't think there is a difference in the model of the SJ-200 Standard in late 2019 vs. now, its just when it was built.  They had this online as the Gibson SJ-200 Standard in Vintage Sunburst, for $4659 (or something like that).  I am in a tax-free state, so I got this for that price - 20%.  

×
×
  • Create New...