Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

onewilyfool

All Access
  • Posts

    7,520
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by onewilyfool

  1. Oh, BTW, I perused the rack of parts, all the bridgeplates are solid Maple. no doubt.

     

    Again, truly impressed by how much hand work goes into these builds. No robots, saw two CNC machines, I think, (I took the tour twice in a row).

     

    All the folks I saw seemed to exude a good deal of pride and know-how in what they were doing - it truly is a vey impressive process, and folks. I can honestly see where the Gibson guitars get their personalities - no two can be exactly alike. They're just all good. Very enlightening tour, highly recommended if you ever get to Bozeman - but you can't just drop in, I suspect a good deal of prior arrangements and agreement would be required, the shop floor is a crowded busy busy place.

    I LIKE the fact that no two are alike……unlike some manufacturer's where they ALL are alike…..

  2. It's a bad design, plain and simple. And the rip out from the drilling of the holes shows a dull tool bit….in my opinion. This is really substandard production. Owners shouldn't have to be fixing these factory mishaps. Clearly it's not just one or two guitars!!!

  3.  

     

    In Randmo's case, a Stewart-MacDonald reinforcement plate ("plate-mate") would be a quick fix, but it wouldn't be needed if the workmanship had been up to par. Pursuing your warranty options would be a worthwhile effort.

    Guys…We have to stop advising folks to repair this kind of sloppy work themselves. It's happened before, with bubbling finish problems around the sound hole, laquer on fretboards……I really feel it prolongs sloppy work from the factory if the end user is responsible for fixing these things. It excuses this type of problem. It's amazing that Dan's problem came to light over a year ago, and that bridge plate hole is still a design problem??? Beyond me...

  4. A few weeks ago I visited Bend, Oregon, was lucky enough to have a tour of the plant arranged, and got to sit in the showroom and play a wall of guitars. The Oregon series was very appealing. If I wasn't at my five guitar limit already, I could have a place for one of these in my stable. Very nice build, good tone, great little guit-box. Built using local Northwest USA woods.

    Dan....if you DO buy that Breedlove, I'll take ANY of your 5 extra Gibsons/Martins....lol!!!

  5. For me, the most highly over-rated acoustical guitar brand is Taylor...just never found one I like.....one good thing about them is the Necks....they are very comfy, dead flat, no buzz, and their best attribute, that and flawless fit and finish. I just can't get the sound...., and the most under-rated is Recording King...great kick for the buck!!! Very good fit and finish, a little stiff and tight, but a great guitar for the money.

  6. I've seen these J-100's and J100 XTRA's, and J-150's on local Craig's list for $1100 to 1400, and they always come around when I have no cash....lol...so I guess I'm not supposed to get one...lol....that being said, I would LOVE to get one, I kind of like the idea of a less-bling version of the J-200...Maybe some day....

  7. Personally, I don't mind refinishing, but "collectors" can be very anal about it. It's is actualy silly, cars get rebuilt from the bottom up, historical buildings get renovated, but if you do ANYTHING to a "vintage" guitar it loses value??? It is just plain silly. My collector friend tells me refinish can halve the value of a vintage guitar?? Again...so silly...

  8. Yes I am blessed to have this one.....one of 32 made, it has Rosewood B&S, on board pick up (not great), 1 13/16" nut with "V" neck.....same size as Nick Lucas model......some were made with Koa B&S (mostly for Japan Market) 14 fretters were also made, they had problems with "Wolf" tones for some reason.

     

    L-20poster.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...