Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

surfpup

All Access
  • Posts

    10,541
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Posts posted by surfpup

  1. Tough call, but since I have Les Pauls with each of those pups in them I guess I should give it a shot... First I have to say that I like both quite a bit. However, here's what I notice about each...

     

    The Duncan Pearly Gates are a great classic rock pickup. I love them. There is a slightly increased mid-range response over a standard PAF pup, and this is even more noticeable in comparison to the BB Pros in my other LP. I have used the Duncan '59 quite a bit also, and I like the extra mids in the Pearlys better. Gain wise they are similar to most PAF type pickups.

     

    The BurstBucker Pros in my other LP have noticeably less mid-range than the Pearlys. They are smooth, but have a bit more treble bite. Initially, I didn't like them and preferred the other guitar with the Pearlys, but they have really grown on me over time.

     

    The verdict... (sort of)... generally I grab the LP with the Pearly Gates pups for a rock sound and the LP with the BurstBucker Pros for a purer blues tone, but they both sound great on almost anything. I have vids of each guitar here - the gold top has the Pearlys and the faded has the Burst Bucker Pros. However, I used different guitars with different amps on different songs, so there is no direct comparison - sorry.

     

    Hope that is helpful. Hit me back if I can be more illustrative.

  2. I am liking the VMs a lot. The brown one reminds me of my first LP a 1979 "The Paul." The VM looks better I think because of the larger fret marker inlays and pup covers. The T-Tops on my "The Paul" were uncovered and fret markers were dots as I recall.

  3. The Valvetronix (2 X 12) was cool at first w/ all the effects & stuff but lacked smooth warm tone.

     

    That sums up my experience with them pretty well. They sound pretty good at low volumes. Great for practice. When they have to compete with anything else, they don't have the warmth and presence of a tube amp.

     

    Also lots of the programmed sounds seemed real processed - very "wet". Too much delay, chorus, etc. Of course you can tweak that, but why spend a lot of time trying to get a good basic warm tone when you can get that to begin with in a good tube amp?

  4. I'm not sure what you're after in an amp' date=' but the Valvetronics (AD xx VT) come in 15, 30, 50, 100 watt in combo and a 100 watt head. One of the really cool features was you can adjust the output without compromising your settings, and its a tube amp!!! But the AC's are real sound monsters. :-k [/quote']

     

    It's sort of a tube amp! Vox's own description ...

     

    "The AD15VT, AD30VT, AD50VT and AD100VT use Valve Reactor technology, and

    feature a power amp circuit containing a 12AX7 (ECC83) dual triode valve (“vacuum

    tube”) that would normally be used in a preamp. This allows the amp to produce the

    true sound and feel of a bona fide all valve (tube) amp. "

     

    I've been less than impressed myself. It's an old trick - use one tube to add some coloring to a solid state amp.

×
×
  • Create New...