Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Late 90s Nashville ES 335 ~ Workmanship ?


Bluesjr

Recommended Posts

Just bought my first Gibson being a 1998 ES335 and by the serial number it was built in Nashville. While checking out the back of the headstock I realised that the curves of the volute blending into the neck are not symmetrical. You can see in the attached photo that the curve on the right is as it should be while the curve on the left is like a dog's hind leg.

 

The rest of the guitar is beautiful workmanship, but as this cost me more than a months wages maybe I'm being a bit picky ;)

 

 

I was pretty surprised when I found this. Would you expect this workmanship to have passed QC at that time ?

 

Gibson Headstock.tiff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does it sound? How does it play? Those should be your main concerns.

 

Yeah I agree completely that how the pups sound and how I like the neck profile etc is really the main thing. In those respects this is the best guitar I've owned.

 

Personally build quality does come into the mix for me on higher end guitars. I was mainly trying to get a feel for other's experiences with workmanship from Nashville in this era . I think it's just strange that this slipped by QC. Just surprised that it made it through. Maybe the neck was done by a less experienced builder or someone was having a bad day.

 

Don't get me wrong this is won't ruin my life, just shooting the proverbial. [cool]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen similar asymmetry on some of my Gibsons too. It never bothered me. OK to have a little evidence of human hands in the process, I guess....though I suppose I wouldn't feel that way from an entirely hand-crafted instrument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't go by the serial number to determine where the guitar was made. Go by the label. If the label say Nashville, it's a Nashville-built guitar. If the label says Memphis, it's Memphis-built.

 

Yeah I had read that the label would give me either Nashville or Memphis as the place of manufacture. I was a bit surprised that neither were shown on the label. The serial number is all I could really go by.

 

 

I've seen similar asymmetry on some of my Gibsons too. It never bothered me. OK to have a little evidence of human hands in the process, I guess....though I suppose I wouldn't feel that way from an entirely hand-crafted instrument.

 

Well thanks for that post, maybe I'm not going crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather it be carved a little too thick than too thin. Your headstock shows the right amount of carve on the right-hand side (looking at its backside). It is the left-hand side that is left a little "thick". I guess a little more could have been taken off but if it does not interfere with your fretting hand, I would leave it alone. As spitball says, it shows a bit of handwork behind it. Be glad it is not all CNC-machine-perfect.

 

You have a great axe. Enjoy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...