Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Natural ES339


GibSinCity

Recommended Posts

Why does natural cost more, wood selection?

 

I have a natural Dot and a Vintage burst 339. I think I still prefer the burst on these guitars.

 

 

If I was doing the John Lennon thing I might consider one. But I play alot of the Beatle songs with my Red 339! K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I love natural finishes & am fortunate enough to have a 335 with one, Gibson's upcharge for natural & custom colors seems a bit over the top. As far as wood selection, my red 339 has beautiful pieces both front & back that could easily have been selected for a natural finish, so it's probably more a matter of being able to extract a greater degree of profit from the sale. Interestingly, Martin does just the opposite by charging more for sunburst finishes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naturals do have to look good from side to side. A VS can hide an imperfection in the wood. Bursts have become desireable...certain bursts are attractive because they are small, or large. Charging more for a certain kind of burst seems reasonable, as does charging more for a nice piece of wood for a Natural finish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...