Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

sg's


rotem

Recommended Posts

hi guys, why does les paul did not like the sg? because of the look? sound? because its thin?, and if he didnt like it why did the continue to sell them? thanks!

 

 

He was not involved in the design of the guitar. Also, he and Mary Ford were going through a rough time that eventually led to a divorce in 1963. Of course you would have had to have asked Les himself for his true thoughts, but these are the reasons that his friends usually suggest. As much as I've read about him I've never seen him quoted on this issue. Les seemed okay SGs at first because there sure are lots of photos of him promoting them. Maybe they reminded him of Mary Ford???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how true this is, but found it on the net.

 

The reasons that Les Paul wanted to have his name taken off the SG Les Paul are several. One is that he did not like the flimsy way the neck on the original SG Les Paul Custom (introduced in very late 1960) and the1961 SG Les Paul Standard joined the body, as it was not stable, and he felt it was “too thin,” all of which hampered the stability of the tuning. Another reason that Les Paul wanted his name removed from the SG Les Paul was because it had a thin Mahogany body, and a red color. Les Paul liked black and gold as the colors for the guitars that bore his name. He liked gold because he felt that it was a color that was associated with everything that was fine in life. He liked black, because of its sophisticated appearance, and because he felt a guitarist’s hands and fingers would stick out more against a black background in live playing venues. Les Paul absolutely did not like the sound produced by the thin all Mahogany body of the SG Les Paul. He was very clear that he preferred the sound of a guitar that had a Maple top. Les Paul also felt that Gibson was skimping and cutting corners on the SG Les Paul, and was producing an inferior product to the original traditional single cutaway Les Paul Standard. All of the above issues, including his not being formally consulted about the changes before they were implemented, regarding a line of guitars that was bearing his name, all contributed to Les Paul’s decision to remove his endorsement, and not renew his contract with Gibson when it expired at the end of 1962

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...