BluesKing777 Posted August 26, 2013 Share Posted August 26, 2013 It depends how many little lots of $37000 you have in your guitar fund - a guy I worked for years ago started a tech company, sold it for a massive profit, started another tech company, merged with a bigger company, left the company after a discreet time, sold the house for approx $50 million etc etc etc etc and on it goes. Well, he would buy a vintage D45 and a brand new a a spare and a couple for the dopey son..........and another for the baby, I suppose.................... My first 'good' guitar, a 72 Fender Telecaster Custom, cost me approx 22 times my weekly pay when I bought it in the 70s. If I could do that now........... BluesKing777. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParlourMan Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 I would agree inferior is not the word I would have picked. But while the name is the same, Gibson is a vastly different company than it once was. Organization, production techniques, materials, and such have gone through quite a few changes. Then again, what company that has been around as long as Gibson has not gone through substantial reorganization and change. Guitar in question is a Martin though..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.