jamescropley1281734044 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 Im watching this on ebay http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=280230939979&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=018 Looks a bit dodgy with no stamped serial number on the neck and no sticker on the inside. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdgails Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 its real. its the earlier sheraton, 86-89 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nic Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 Why would someone make a fake version of a $400 guitar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockin_Dude Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 It`s real,nice finish on it too,satin looks to be in good condition ,back looks nice and clean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iansmitchell Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 Why would someone make a fake version of a $400 guitar? Because they could make it for 150. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubstar Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 yup! "Why would someone make a fake version of a $400 guitar?" I guess you don't check the internet too often? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schtang Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 Why would someone make a fake version of a $400 guitar? Even though guitars are so cheap in American and that includes Gibsons, in a lot of other countries we pay big for guitars. In Australia a new Epi Sherri cost $1200 with case, that = about $1180 US dollars. Therefore the criminals who put together fake guitars would definitely made a excellent profit by faking the Sherraton and selling it in Australia, New Zealand, South America, South Africa and Europe (not sure about the UK or Japan because guitars seem to be cheap there also) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.