Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Sustainable question


Walnut fan

Recommended Posts

Hey all, I’m curious about the sustainable line of acoustics. I see some of them have a richlite fingerboard and wood inlays but I think I just saw one with a walnut fingerboard and no inlays. Can anyone give me the skinny on the history and the different designs? What came first, etc? Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sustainable line has not been around long enough to have a history.   But what you get seems to depend on the model.  So a J45 will have a richlite fingerboard while a Hummingbird will have a walnut board.   I would not be surprised if down the road Gibson went in both directions on any given model.   I gather one of the things which separates the sustainable line from others with similar features is the beeswax finish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks! I found this one online so I guess there's some different specs even among the same model 

J-45 Sustainable Acoustic-Electric Guitar Specifications:

Body

  • Body type: Dreadnought, Non-Cutaway
  • Top wood: Sitka spruce
  • Back & sides: Walnut
  • Bracing pattern: X
  • Body finish: Hand-rubbed wax

Neck

  • Neck shape: Slim Taper
  • Nut width: 1.725"
  • Fingerboard: Walnut
  • Neck wood: Mahogany
  • Scale length: 24.75"
  • Number of frets: 20
  • Bridge: Walnut
  • Saddle & nut: TUSQ

Electronics

  • Pickup/preamp: L.R. Baggs VTC

Other

  • Tuning machines: Grover Rotomatic
  • Orientation: Right Handed
  • Number of strings: 6-string
  • Case: Gibson hardshell case
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WF,

Actually … they were only offered for 2 years it seems . The first year was the year they had richlite and inlays and the second year the model was revised and it made more sense to put walnut and no inlays on something deemed sustainable.

Dave Davies of The Kinks picked one up (L 00 body )from the London Showroom a while back .His is a first year model as shown by the inlays :

https://www.instagram.com/p/CQlh0QwMhEm/?utm_medium=copy_link

 

JC

Edited by JuanCarlosVejar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've had two walnut guitars. Both great guitars but I decided I did not like it as a tonewood.

I had one of these Jackson Browne guitars.

Distinguished by a red spruce top and sustainably—farmed English walnut back and sides

30785583-8626-4f24-a1cd-7ca7bf7149b6.jpg

 

http://legacy.gibson.com/Products/Acoustic-Instruments/Round-Shoulder/Gibson-Acoustic/Jackson-Browne-Signature.aspx

I also had an AJ Gold with the walnut sides and back.

aj-1.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dave F said:

 

I've had two walnut guitars. Both great guitars but I decided I did not like it as a tonewood.

I had one of these Jackson Browne guitars.

Distinguished by a red spruce top and sustainably—farmed English walnut back and sides

30785583-8626-4f24-a1cd-7ca7bf7149b6.jpg

 

http://legacy.gibson.com/Products/Acoustic-Instruments/Round-Shoulder/Gibson-Acoustic/Jackson-Browne-Signature.aspx

I also had an AJ Gold with the walnut sides and back.

aj-1.jpg

 

What a Beautiful Guitar.

Edited by kelly campbell
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...