EVOL! Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 My complaint is with food processors who are adding sugar to foods that people expect to be low in calories and elect to eat for the dietary benefits. I'll go one further and say it is evil deception to feed us GMO stuff and not label it as such. At least if something has HFC, added sugar, or a neurotoxin like aspartame I can read that on the label. GMO is a roll of the dice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVOL! Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 If an underage person has imbibed of vanilla extract or other substances containing alcohol, booze is exactly what he/she will be perceived as having used in the eye of the law. Even aftershave and other stuff regardless how it may be otherwise poisonous. m Perception and reality are not always the same, are they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigzag Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 If the government wants to regulate sugar, then they'll have to also regulate starch. Complex Carbs/Starch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaleb Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 Sugar shouldn't be regulated. Fructose should only be used for certain things... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.