Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Dave F

All Access
  • Posts

    5,013
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by Dave F

  1. 9 minutes ago, JimRockford said:

    Thanks for chiming in.

    It could very well be.  I realized that the reason I thought it was a 1952 was an article I had read over a decade ago in Guitar International.  She had mentioned that her grandfather had given her a 1952 in mint condition that she liked for recording sessions.  I didn't think Gibson used that style of pick guard until a decade or so later.

    That said, 1) I could be way wrong, and 2) that may not be the guitar she was talking about in the article.

    It does have a very nice sound though.

    3) Grandpa could had switched pick guards

  2. 7 hours ago, PrairieDog said:

    I’ve been wondering about the indifference to the damage, and I think you are on to something… rather than paying their own luthiers to fix them, I wonder if they are relying on the buyers shipping them back to Gibson under the warranty as QC issues.  However, I would think 20 guitars all needing the same repair from the same vendor location might raise the antenna at the mothership.

      

    Don't know about this GC, but I have a friend that works at the one close to me. They're told to not worry about the guitars. Let the kids bang on them. As an employee, you would have to get numb about them. I doubt if any of them are qualified to repair cracks. Any repairs would need  submitted to Gibson for approval. Also, they usually have one in the back untouched in a box or can get you one within a few days

  3. 22 hours ago, Sgt. Pepper said:

    Martin sure charges a lot for their Uke's.

    George Harrison was supposed to be proficient on a Uke.

    They do get a bit pricey

    51053058518_87545c7486_m.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...