Dave F Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I'm surprised this guy has a 100% feedback rating http://www.ebay.com/...=item43dddca226 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fp Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Am I missing your point ? I don't see any deception in his description of the guitar. To me it looks like someone took a 70's Gibson neck and put it on a non-Gibson body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave F Posted June 11, 2015 Author Share Posted June 11, 2015 So if I take a Mercedes hood emblem on put it on a Hyundai I can advertise it as a 'Mercedes?' That has some questionable parts but is similar to xyz model? Also, for being so vague about the guitar, why would one believe the description of the solid woods and bone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrairieSchooner Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 The description says that the body is either not Gibson or has been extensively modified. I guess I don't see the issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
62burst Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 The seller raises sufficient doubt as to the guitar being a Gibson in the description, but the listing title "Gibson Guitar" is misleading. A better title might have read "Possible Gibson guitar", or "Gibson headstock- comes w/ free guitar!" ; ). Gotta love the euphemism "the head seems to have been separated from the neck.." I hate when that happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j45nick Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Gotta love the euphemism "the head seems to have been separated from the neck.." I hate when that happens. [/size] Didn't work out so well for Anne Boleyn, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.