Stevie Nazarenie Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 i love this. i saw the other comparison vids and thought the marshall haze was better than the first 4 here. here it doesn't sound as good. but i may go for one. the big surprise was the epi valve jnr which i have not been too hot on. here it sounds cool. guess i need a jackson though!:D/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricochet Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 What a frekkin waist of time! :D Crap playing through a crap sounding recording. Utter pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWANG Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 the vox and the egnater were fairly ok...but the guitar and recording didn't help... I was thinking all the way through it.. I build vjs.. and so far something is wrong.. as much as I like them mine still should be kicking the butt of everything he's playing. then he got to the vj.. and it's better than that recording even stock. Honestly, I can do everything but the overtly metally sounds with my modded vj and I think that he rushed through these so fast he didn't really represent them very well. Plus whatever pups he has in that jackson weren't doing anyone any great service.. though it could be something else. too many sounds seemed to me like he had a couple old socks over his mic. I liked the idea though.. just wish it was done better. A modded vj really kicks butt for a recording like this if done just half well.. and again even a stock vj or vox should have rocked out, probably the orange, too, though I've not heard one. I can see why you'd like the youtube.. neat idea.. but all the sparkle was missing.. from just about everything. hell.. a stock vj with a decent eq in front could give you most of this! TWANG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie Nazarenie Posted September 30, 2009 Author Share Posted September 30, 2009 yeah maybe but i can hear what i needed to hear. i do alot of looking at amps on youtube. i use headphones and keep looking to get an average on the sounds i hear. this is actually the best vj i have heard here on youtube! anyway yeah he has emg 81 (ceramic) in the bridge and 85? in the neck. i heard him say that on one of his videos. maybe is pickups are "sterile" as we hear with emgs? i also thought his playing was ok. but then i'm oldskhool. have a look at the "haze vs night train" i think he does well in getting a good sound and walking us through them. the 10 in 10 minutes was a little quick but worked for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sledge57 Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Most of his reviews sound bad, I listened to one he did on a Vox AC4TVH and a Vox Night Train. If I had seen that and believed that's what an AC4 sounded like I never would have bought one. I'm glad I didn't hear him before I decided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWANG Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 I don't think it was all that bad ric.. but then I dont own a vox. and I'm admittedly loopy about my vjs! that served it's purpose, I think, in the end. and it was kinda fun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EpiphonePlayer Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 This is a cool that Krank amp sounds like crap though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricochet Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 I don't think it was all that bad ric.. but then I dont own a vox.and I'm admittedly loopy about my vjs! that served it's purpose' date=' I think, in the end. and it was kinda fun! [/quote'] Well it certainly seemed fun for him. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangbang Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 It was kind of fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.