FirstMeasure Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Firstmeasure... Yup on intents vs. results - just like a football pass is intended for one thing that may not be concluded as envisioned. Hence aesthetics. Also, wind chimes may be crafted by humans, but unless a human is "playing" them, it's arguably not "music." m That's why I say tuned wind chimes might be music because the human who invented them intended for them to make chords in the wind, which would be a very artistic approach to music. But then, even atonal wind chimes could be used to make music if a human were hitting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pippy Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 That's why I say tuned wind chimes might be music because the human who invented them intended for them to make chords in the wind, which would be a very artistic approach to music. But then, even atonal wind chimes could be used to make music if a human were hitting it. Does the original intention behind the creation of a piece automatically mean any noise(s) which it may produce will always be 'Music'? If anyone - or group of people - hit, at random, the keys of a piano keyboard with no rational thought, intent or pattern, should the resulting cacophony be considered 'Music'? I'd say 'No'. But if those very same notes/intervals were written down beforehand and performed with the necessary amount of aptitude I'd say 'Yes'. Odd, huh? P. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milod Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Pippy... I'd say the difference in intent and product is not odd at all. When I was in college, for example, I wrote an atonal 12-tone piano piece that actually was performed for a large (for a small school) music class. I personally don't think it sounded any worse than Webern's piano stuff... a theme, inversions, retrogrades, retrograde inversions... <grin> Both still sounded to me like a cupla cats fighting on a keyboard. The piece was played by an excellent classical musician who was an artist in residence, btw. Don't ask what happened to it 'cuz I haven't seen the sheet music in approaching 50 years... Ain't messed with writing for piano since, either. m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirstMeasure Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 Does the original intention behind the creation of a piece automatically mean any noise(s) which it may produce will always be 'Music'? If anyone - or group of people - hit, at random, the keys of a piano keyboard with no rational thought, intent or pattern, should the resulting cacophony be considered 'Music'? I'd say 'No'. But if those very same notes/intervals were written down beforehand and performed with the necessary amount of aptitude I'd say 'Yes'. Odd, huh? P. So even though it's art with sound, it's not necessarily music. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigzag Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Sorry to dig up a tired old thread, but I thought this was pretty cool and an appropriate thread to put it in. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c84C6YZirzE Are you buying it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.